5 reviews
Paul Lukas was a good actor. However, he was a bit limited because of his very strong Hungarian accent--even stronger than his countryman, Bela Lugosi. So, when he's cast in the lead as a rich Chinese gentleman you are left wondering who was the idiot that made this casting decision! In an unusual plot, Yung Sing (Lukas) falls in love with and marries an English woman (Kay Walsh). Such interracial goings on were very unusual in films at that time--and perhaps it's intended as a warning against this. That's because Walsh is not happy and soon begins cheating on her husband--who, in turn, concocts a plan to torment her and destroy her lover. When Walsh's sister arrives for a visit, she sees all this weirdness and is shocked--and even more shocked when Sing proposes to get rid of his faithless wife and make the sister his next bride! The story is hindered by Lukas as well as a relatively slow pace. However, the story works quite well towards the end--and concludes on an exciting note. Not a great B-movie but a very good one. Just keep that pesky brain from complaining when you see and hear Lukas!!
- planktonrules
- Jun 15, 2011
- Permalink
Over the past week I have by chance looked at three movies set in Malaysia and environs: CRAZY RICH ASIANS, a modern fairy tale set in Singapore among the Chinese super-rich; TRIP TO BORNEO, a travelogue from 1907, in which Chinese workers perform grunt labor; and this one from 1940, in which an improbably cast Paul Lukas is a rich Chinese man who marries touring singer Kay Walsh, takes her to his home in the jungle, then brings in her sister, Jane Baxter to alleviate her loneliness. In the meantime, the two women have fallen in love with two stiff-lipped British brothers, played by Robert and Wallace Douglas (who were no relations in real life).
It was the third and final screen version of a novel by Marion Osmond, directed by George King, now best remembered for helming the Tod Slaughter melodramas in the 1930s. It's full of the standard British racist casting that didn't go out of style for many a year; Christopher Lee was still playing Fu Manchu in 1969, after all. Yet Lukas' character is clearly wronged and he is a gentleman about it.... assuming you accept that wives are property, of course, which since I am writing this in 2018, they are not, of course.
In any case, this is a technically fine movie, with some good camerawork throughout by Hone Glendinning and a story that hangs together, thanks to editor Jack Harris. This was not an A movie, but it was produced by British Lion, when it was making a run upwards towards IN WHICH WE SERVE. It turns out that when you gave him a budget, King could produce a decent film, even if his taste and morals seems out of date almost eighty years later.
It was the third and final screen version of a novel by Marion Osmond, directed by George King, now best remembered for helming the Tod Slaughter melodramas in the 1930s. It's full of the standard British racist casting that didn't go out of style for many a year; Christopher Lee was still playing Fu Manchu in 1969, after all. Yet Lukas' character is clearly wronged and he is a gentleman about it.... assuming you accept that wives are property, of course, which since I am writing this in 2018, they are not, of course.
In any case, this is a technically fine movie, with some good camerawork throughout by Hone Glendinning and a story that hangs together, thanks to editor Jack Harris. This was not an A movie, but it was produced by British Lion, when it was making a run upwards towards IN WHICH WE SERVE. It turns out that when you gave him a budget, King could produce a decent film, even if his taste and morals seems out of date almost eighty years later.
- mark.waltz
- Aug 25, 2022
- Permalink
- malcolmgsw
- Nov 22, 2018
- Permalink