Carroll Baker is not nude in this
(1971) The Fourth Victim/ La última señora Anderson
DUBBED
THRILLER
Adapted from a short story by C. B. Gilford co-written and directed by Eugenio Martín that showcases a young lady lying on a pool floating device and she looked emotionless with a cigarette dangling on her finger. And by the time the time the cigarette hits the floating tube she was lying on, she would then sink into the pool, and it was during then the housekeeper, Felicity Downing (Miranda Campa) would go up to find wealthy owner, Mr. Arthur Anderson (Michael Craig) and both of them would go to it before removing her lifeless body out of their and into the bed, wiping her down, and after the do doctor write down his medical findings. The next scene would then have both Arthur and his loyal housekeeper at the funeral and it was during then, he is approached by Scotland Yard inspector, Dunphy (José Luis Lopez Vazquez) to whcih he reveal to viewers that this happens to be the third wife who died over the last three years. And that Arthur himself had benefited financially from them as a result of life insurance. And when Arthur went to trial, and the housekeeper Felicity committed perjury by claiming that his latest wife heavily overdosed on medication, part of the reason she had drowned, it was sufficient enough to find him innocent by the jury. And that is when Julie Spencer (Carroll Baker) comes in, moving into the mansion next door to which the first time he caught his attention is when she uses his pool. Will Jule be the "fourth victim"- hence the tile after Arthur's first three wives all had died in unexpected circumstances.
Anyone were to watch the ending of this movie would not be able to make sense what just happened. Like, on one hand it was supposed to be whether Arthur Anderson had anything to do with the deaths of one of his three wives. And then it was like, it just shifted it's focal point to a crazy woman and the lady who presumed another lady's identity. It is as if producers intervened and did not like the ending that would have made more sense since at the opening, it did appear to look like the drowning death was staged to make it look like she died of a drowning when she was already been dead for awhile. Anyways, it is unusual for murder/slasher movie to end the way that it did even though it may have cheated viewers watching it. It was also unusual to see an funded European movie where Carroll Baker is not naked in this.
Adapted from a short story by C. B. Gilford co-written and directed by Eugenio Martín that showcases a young lady lying on a pool floating device and she looked emotionless with a cigarette dangling on her finger. And by the time the time the cigarette hits the floating tube she was lying on, she would then sink into the pool, and it was during then the housekeeper, Felicity Downing (Miranda Campa) would go up to find wealthy owner, Mr. Arthur Anderson (Michael Craig) and both of them would go to it before removing her lifeless body out of their and into the bed, wiping her down, and after the do doctor write down his medical findings. The next scene would then have both Arthur and his loyal housekeeper at the funeral and it was during then, he is approached by Scotland Yard inspector, Dunphy (José Luis Lopez Vazquez) to whcih he reveal to viewers that this happens to be the third wife who died over the last three years. And that Arthur himself had benefited financially from them as a result of life insurance. And when Arthur went to trial, and the housekeeper Felicity committed perjury by claiming that his latest wife heavily overdosed on medication, part of the reason she had drowned, it was sufficient enough to find him innocent by the jury. And that is when Julie Spencer (Carroll Baker) comes in, moving into the mansion next door to which the first time he caught his attention is when she uses his pool. Will Jule be the "fourth victim"- hence the tile after Arthur's first three wives all had died in unexpected circumstances.
Anyone were to watch the ending of this movie would not be able to make sense what just happened. Like, on one hand it was supposed to be whether Arthur Anderson had anything to do with the deaths of one of his three wives. And then it was like, it just shifted it's focal point to a crazy woman and the lady who presumed another lady's identity. It is as if producers intervened and did not like the ending that would have made more sense since at the opening, it did appear to look like the drowning death was staged to make it look like she died of a drowning when she was already been dead for awhile. Anyways, it is unusual for murder/slasher movie to end the way that it did even though it may have cheated viewers watching it. It was also unusual to see an funded European movie where Carroll Baker is not naked in this.
- jordondave-28085
- Dec 13, 2024