71
Metascore
7 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 100The TelegraphThe TelegraphWriter-director Alan Parker's utterly delightful, tongue-in-cheek love letter to the gangster genre.
- 88Chicago Sun-TimesRoger EbertChicago Sun-TimesRoger EbertIn an uncanny way the movie works as a gangster movie and we remember that the old Bogart and Cagney classics had a childlike innocence, too. The world was simpler then. Now it's so complicated maybe only a kid can still understand the Bogart role.
- 80EmpireIan NathanEmpireIan NathanThe songs and set pieces are still fresh and infectious and most of the child cast are mesmerisingly good. I defy anyone not to be caught up in the charm and nostalgia.
- 70NewsweekJack KrollNewsweekJack KrollA perversely appealing apotheosis of cuteness. Almost inadvertently, the film becomes an ultimate comment on American innocence that can only refresh itself by regression. The unseen patron saint of Parker's stylish movie is not Little Caesar but Humbert Humbert. [27 Sept 1976, p.89]
- 40Time OutTime OutPaul Williams’ annoyingly hummable honky-tonk soundtrack punctuates proceedings, which graze the zenith of that seventies inclination towards sexualising teen performers (think ‘Minipops’ in America).
- 30The New YorkerPauline KaelThe New YorkerPauline KaelIt operates on darlingness and the kitsch of innocence. The almost pornographic dislocation, which is the source of the film's possible appeal as a novelty, is never acknowledged, but the camera lingers on a gangster's pudgy, infantile fingers or a femme fatale's soft little belly pushing out of her tight stain dress, and it roves over the pubescent figures in the chorus line.