Totally Exposed

Just a curiosity, but check out Kelli Konop's ("Sue" in this film) more recent career in movie production. This film (Totally Exposed) seems to have been her big start in the business. She is listed as producer on many other more mainstream projects on the database. Good for her! She seems to be doing better than Tina Bockrath at any rate.

As far as this movie goes...the pace is incredibly slow, the acting is abysmal and the glimpses of nudity are too brief to be as entertaining as a movie of this genre should be. The shower scene, in particular, is paced so slowly as to miss whatever prurient value to be obtained by watching a pretty girl bathing. It is the fantasy that we should be seeing, not the hygiene.

My one-liner for this film is "Rinse and don't repeat."

Bill (Mark Jackson) and Sue (Kelli Konop) run a little tanning and massage shop in Hollywood, enjoying a completely "business-platonic" relationship. Sue is a live-in girlfriend of Jake a prosperous but very obsessed businessman and Bill gives "extra services" to some of his his outcall clients. Ken (Chris Landis) is a gay assistant at the shop. Tina Bockrath, (Playboy's POM of May, 1990) makes a slightly more than cameo appearance as Lillian Tucker, first in the order of Bill's outcall clients that we see.

All is fine until Sue realizes that she is in a dead end relationship with Jake, at the same time that Bill starts having second thoughts about the "extras" that he performs for his clients. Linda (Honey Smax) as Sue's best provides the catalyst by telling Sue and Bill, alternately, that the other is in love but won't make the first move. When Bill helps Sue move out of Jake's house they begin to see each other differently.

I would rate it higher than those who called it worthless. It has numerous beautiful women and at least one "hunk." There are worse ways to spend an hour and a half.

This movie is leaden, slow, dull, labored, obvious to the extreme, poorly scripted and tedious. Were it not for the fact that Tina Bockrath is in this abuse of celluloid, it would be absolutely worthless, and even with her, it's still awful! Granted, Tina Bockrath is not a terribly good actress. But she is one of the prettiest ladies to ever grace the pages of Mr. Hefner's publication. On her appearance, this error in cinema gets a four (and I'm being generous at that)