A film of the name- Aurélia Steiner a name invented by Duras to stand in for and (this a matter that's more complicated, and perhaps more dubious) to identify with the losses of the Holocaust-the girl of 18 (as Duras was when she left Vietnam for France; as is 'she' in 'Hiroshima Mon Amor' when her lover is killed), on the cusp of adulthood, who decides, as Duras did, to write. The name is that which is given, over which on has little control-here, not the name of the father but of the mother, passed on (the Jewish maternal line)-a name signalling ethnicity ('Juden Aurélia Steiner' repeats a lover)-a name which echoes the name of the dead mother and stages a revenant return even as it also associates the living with the dead, on that wider scale of historical horror. Half way through the film, we see the handwritten name on screen-though we never see a face, a body, a person to put to that name; and towards the end, Duras speaks the voice of repeating the name in an erotic encounter, obsessively, turning over each syllable until those are the only words he can speak, yet which become more and more detached from personal connection and meaning the more he repeats them. This erotic pairing plays throughout the film, in multiple variants: the man with black hair and blue eyes, who is at once the father hanged in the camp for stealing soup to feed his new-born daughter, and the speaker, the daughter Aurélia, seeking her father in teenage sailors and other lovers-the pairing of I and you, she and he that so preoccupied Duras at this time, in writing that grew out of epistolary texts to absent or imaginary addressees.
Filmed in black and white, unlike the majority of the films from this period, the visual methodology, the movement of the film is that of the tracking shot-the use of this particular form echoing the debate about Holocaust and famously emblematised in Jacques Rivette and excoriation of the tracking shot in Pontecorvo's 'Kapo', later turned into a kind of basis for a critical ethics of film by Serge Daney). While, in 'Les Mains Négatives', humans appear fleetingly at the edge of the picture-moments central to how one might interpret that film politically-this 'Aurélia Steiner' is devoid of any such traces. What we see, however, serves as symbolic representation or displacement of a trauma which, as Rivette had argued, lies beyond the ethical boundaries of representation. Thus, the figure of the 'white rectangle' described as the spot of execution-the camp under a German sky-seems to find its equivalent in a burst of sun through cloud; and the tracking shots of trees, chopped down and laid out, numbers inscribed on their lopped off trunks, of the overgrown tracks and platforms of an abandoned railway station, suggest the mechanisation of death in transport and execution of the camps, as the speaker describes substituting erotic encounters for the impossible encounter with the dead father. Or the space with which the film begins-that of the edge, viewed in calm-the sea, the horizon, the waves-reconstructed by the voice as, on the one hand, the space of death, of execution in the camp, and on the other of erotic desire, felt as a giving over of self, of entry, which seems at once to assuage and to replay the trauma of that death, Aurélia Steiner an infant laid on the ground beside her dead mother in the 'white rectangle'. The speaker recollects a storm, real or imagined, that has previously exploded over (and under) the city, then receded: landscape in calm bears the trace of a foundational, invisible disruption, and, even in calm, the white rectangle (the sun through clouds) and a 'black spot' on the horizon form something like visual floaters on the most absent or distant of landscapes.
Duras picked Vancouver and Melbourne as Aurélia's locations, though filming in France, because of their distance from Europe; trauma is not bounded by geography. Spending so much time by the sea-as in many of Duras' other films-a space at once of arrival and departure, the film ends as the lover sails away, bids farewell. Aurélia Steiner seems to become both the woman he sails with, or to, and the one he leaves behind: Aurélia, this figure who Duras later said 'is everywhere, writes from everywhere at the same time', as a figure of total identification, disavowal and loss, of writing as survival-writing to the impossible recipient, here, the dead father and the lovers who replace him, in the companion film, another lost lover. The address seeks to bring back to life the lost object against the impossibility of resurrection, whilst the activities of the living-writing, sex, the present inhabitation of a landscape far removed from the horrors of Europe-is itself under/over-written by death. For Duras, such paradoxes are the only way to represent that which is hijacked, overdetermined, defamed. Duras said that it was this project that brought her back to writing after years of writing only for the cinema-yet a writing whose conditions of possibility seem here to be that of cinema, a cinema whose conditions of possibility are those of writing, all for that which cannot be written, that which is written in numbers on skin (a number equivalent to that of the camp tattoo appears after the words of Steiner's name in the close ups of handwritten text), the film ending with the statement of identity-name, place where you live, age, parents, occupation-its final words the statement of continuance that, for Duras, is that which enables one to keep on living, that becomes like breathing itself: "I write".
