7 reviews
I hate wannabe, pseudo-porn. It's a waste of talent, film, and time. This one, although, is much better than many, but still fails to be anything more than a pathetic almost porn movie. There was some glimpses of fun and value here, but not enough to sustain the momentum. In the end, it's a "4"...if you're really bored and don't mind seeing half naked, good looking, women, then give this a shot. But don't expect anything better than late-night cable fare.
Call me a weirdo, but I am a big fan of this movie. Very funny and very sexy women. The plot is just cheesy enough to be hilarious. The acting is as bad as can be expected, but the total package of the movie makes it decent. It's not for everybody, but if you're not offended by R-rated porn, then you could be surprised!
The plot is an interesting concept but poorly developed. The scenes and settings do not support a premise that any "Chemistry" is being developed. But then again, it's really a spoofy take on some Mad Scientist chemistry using the "Scientist" as his/her own Test Subject. And Maybe some subtle implications on the chemistry between the characters. There may be enough voyeuristic watching the Lab thru a window to imply some kinky experimentation. I lost count of how many scenes included full frontal nudity - some worth more than others, but most of the Make-out scenes were a little too gymnastic and lacked credible passion. The actors have very few credits to their name. I would take time to see a bit more of Jeff Xander and Raisa Ivanic. For low-budget light entertainment - I'd still bet this movie was a lot more fun to make than it was to watch!
I liked the movie - the plot premise, while probably a bit overdone (How many male-to-female/Jekyll-and-Hyde movies are there, anyway?) is a good one, and, while the sex scenes were a bit overdone, they weren't TOO gratuitous...
Though, personally, I think the movie would have made just as much sense with a few minutes of sex clipped out - obviously, some nudity would need to stay for artistic and plot purposes, but about half the sex could be edited out without too much problem if done properly.
Overall, though there's a bit too much cheap fan-service for some tastes, it's a enjoyable movie.
Though, personally, I think the movie would have made just as much sense with a few minutes of sex clipped out - obviously, some nudity would need to stay for artistic and plot purposes, but about half the sex could be edited out without too much problem if done properly.
Overall, though there's a bit too much cheap fan-service for some tastes, it's a enjoyable movie.
- otakuman64
- Oct 27, 2006
- Permalink
I think this was an interesting concept about testing for new drugs to enhance sexuality. But you did have to go with the flow it did go a bit overboard in the premise of the movie but I did not rent it for the great plot and great directing. it was a good movie for the kind it is and will look for other movies by stephanee LaFleur.
- jazzjunkie
- Apr 18, 2003
- Permalink
I seen this movie and I thought is was funny. It was campy but it was funny. I thought that it really didn't need as much sex in the movie. It would have been fine without the sex. I like Stephanee LaFleur. I have seen her movies and I like her. I also thought that the guy that played Robert was good too.
Overall I give this movie a 6.
Overall I give this movie a 6.
- wickedb1ch
- Mar 9, 2000
- Permalink
- charlytully
- Nov 17, 2008
- Permalink