61
Metascore
33 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 80Chicago ReaderLisa AlspectorChicago ReaderLisa AlspectorIt's a heady mix of the earnest, the grave, and the frivolous. Wizardly director Kevin Reynolds even manages to condense into a single shot, with a wisp of humor, several of the hero’s long years in a dungeon without making them any less grueling.
- 75Baltimore SunMichael SragowBaltimore SunMichael SragowPerformances by Jim Caviezel and Richard Harris make this a great adventure.
- 75Chicago Sun-TimesRoger EbertChicago Sun-TimesRoger EbertThis is the kind of adventure picture the studios churned out in the Golden Age -- so traditional it almost feels new.
- 75Charlotte ObserverLawrence ToppmanCharlotte ObserverLawrence ToppmanIt pays homage to the genre's most glorious days.
- 67Seattle Post-IntelligencerWilliam ArnoldSeattle Post-IntelligencerWilliam ArnoldAs a revenge thriller, the movie is serviceable, but it doesn't really deliver the delicious guilty pleasure of the better film versions.
- 63USA TodayClaudia PuigUSA TodayClaudia PuigFor younger audiences drawn by the attractive actors, this might be their introduction to the Dumas epic. At least it's an effective and rousing version.
- 50New York Daily NewsJami BernardNew York Daily NewsJami BernardWith more buckling than swash, The Count of Monte Cristo is a good-looking, poorly acted washout.
- 50Wall Street JournalJoe MorgensternWall Street JournalJoe MorgensternJames Caviezel makes us care more about that innocent romantic, Edmond Dantes, than we may care to care about the rest of the picture, which entertains in fits and starts, with startling ruptures in tone.
- 50ReelViewsJames BerardinelliReelViewsJames BerardinelliThis latest version, made with the MTV generation in mind, is arguably the least impressive of the filmed Counts.
- 38New York PostLou LumenickNew York PostLou LumenickThis is the time of the year movie studios traditionally dump their mistakes into theaters -- and boy, did Disney make a whopper with The Count of Monte Cristo.