A new Disney version of the classic children's stories about Winnie the Pooh and his friends.A new Disney version of the classic children's stories about Winnie the Pooh and his friends.A new Disney version of the classic children's stories about Winnie the Pooh and his friends.
- Awards
- 1 win & 3 nominations total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
When I was a little girl, The Book of Pooh felt like a quiet treasure tucked into my mornings. I remember sitting cross-legged in front of the TV, watching the pages of a storybook turn and reveal the familiar faces of Pooh, Piglet, Tigger, and the rest of the gang-only this time, they weren't animated in the usual way. The puppetry-meets-digital style was unlike anything I'd seen before. It was whimsical, but also a little uncanny, like watching plush toys come to life inside a watercolor dream.
The show had a gentle, literary tone that made it feel more like a lullaby than a cartoon. Each episode opened with a narrator flipping through a golden storybook, setting the stage for a tale that unfolded slowly and sweetly. The characters stayed true to their classic personalities-Pooh's honey-brained musings, Piglet's nervous charm, Tigger's bouncy bravado-but the pacing was noticeably slower than other shows I loved at the time. It felt more like a quiet read-along than an adventure.
As a kid, I appreciated the warmth and familiarity, but I also found myself drifting. The stories were soft and kind, but not always gripping. The visual style, while creative, sometimes made the characters feel distant, like they were part of a museum exhibit rather than a world I could jump into. Still, there was something comforting about the show's rhythm, its gentle music, and its emphasis on friendship and imagination.
I'd give The Book of Pooh a 6/10. It was tender and thoughtful, a show that felt like a hug-but one that didn't always hold my attention. It's a piece of my childhood I remember fondly, even if it didn't become a favorite. Like a well-worn storybook, it was there when I needed a little calm, and sometimes that's enough.
The show had a gentle, literary tone that made it feel more like a lullaby than a cartoon. Each episode opened with a narrator flipping through a golden storybook, setting the stage for a tale that unfolded slowly and sweetly. The characters stayed true to their classic personalities-Pooh's honey-brained musings, Piglet's nervous charm, Tigger's bouncy bravado-but the pacing was noticeably slower than other shows I loved at the time. It felt more like a quiet read-along than an adventure.
As a kid, I appreciated the warmth and familiarity, but I also found myself drifting. The stories were soft and kind, but not always gripping. The visual style, while creative, sometimes made the characters feel distant, like they were part of a museum exhibit rather than a world I could jump into. Still, there was something comforting about the show's rhythm, its gentle music, and its emphasis on friendship and imagination.
I'd give The Book of Pooh a 6/10. It was tender and thoughtful, a show that felt like a hug-but one that didn't always hold my attention. It's a piece of my childhood I remember fondly, even if it didn't become a favorite. Like a well-worn storybook, it was there when I needed a little calm, and sometimes that's enough.
Die-hard fans of the books or the cartoons might not take so kindly to it. But at the very least you have to appreciate the work that goes into making this show. It's an ancient form of Japanese puppetry, and is filmed with a green screen with computer-generated backgrounds added later, making it interesting to watch. The storylines are, as one reviewer put it, rather "fluffy," but you were expecting Shakespeare? The show is targeted at preschoolers. (Actually, there was one episode about Shakespeare, in which the gang put on a play for Owl.)
There are some of differences between "Book of Pooh" and the books and cartoon series. Kanga and Roo were missing for several months, although they do show up in newer episodes. And they brought back Kessie the blue bird, who appeared in two of the cartoon episodes. And I must agree that Rabbit is, for some reason, a lot more bossy than he was in the cartoon series.
Overall, it's a cute show, and little kids will probably like it, although it might be a little too different for those who don't like change.
There are some of differences between "Book of Pooh" and the books and cartoon series. Kanga and Roo were missing for several months, although they do show up in newer episodes. And they brought back Kessie the blue bird, who appeared in two of the cartoon episodes. And I must agree that Rabbit is, for some reason, a lot more bossy than he was in the cartoon series.
Overall, it's a cute show, and little kids will probably like it, although it might be a little too different for those who don't like change.
At 17, I admit I like this show. While not like the books by AA Milne, other than the characters' names, it is cute and charming and nice for preschoolers. The stories are a little on the predictable side, and I admit Rabbit is more bossy than he is in New Adventures of Winnie the Pooh, the 1977 film The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh(based on the 3 shorts Honey Tree, Tigger Too and Blustery Day) and the books. However, the background scenery is colourful and nice to look at, the puppetry is above average, the voices are fine and the songs are sweet and memorable in general. I have always had a soft spot for Tigger, he reminds me of my sister when she was little, but I also like the little bluebird Kassie. In conclusion, I like it. 8/10 Bethany Cox
"The Book of Pooh" is the second live-action TV adaption of A.A. Milne's beloved character Winnie the Pooh and friends have gotten by Disney. The first was "Welcome to Pooh Corner" some years back, which featured full-body costumes and not so much puppets, as this one does.
I love puppetry, a big fan of Sesame Street and the Muppets myself, but I have a feeling that the move to puppets was made to crank out more of the popular 'Pooh' faster than is possible with animation. Here, the foam and fleece characters don't have much restriction to their movements. The backgrounds are all punched in on a blue screen, so it seems the puppeteers were free to move about the stage.
I guess kids who like Pooh can be happy because their pushing out tons of these, but theres nothing special about the stories and the presentation is a bit fluffy.
I love puppetry, a big fan of Sesame Street and the Muppets myself, but I have a feeling that the move to puppets was made to crank out more of the popular 'Pooh' faster than is possible with animation. Here, the foam and fleece characters don't have much restriction to their movements. The backgrounds are all punched in on a blue screen, so it seems the puppeteers were free to move about the stage.
I guess kids who like Pooh can be happy because their pushing out tons of these, but theres nothing special about the stories and the presentation is a bit fluffy.
The only thing about the Book of Pooh that resemble Milne's series is the looks of the characters. None of the personalities are transferred over to the puppets. Instead of the classic relationships such as Rabbit vs. Tigger we are given sappy, cute, supportive clones. All of this translates to an unwatchable perversion of the classic series. No, this is not Pooh.
Did you know
- TriviaThe style of puppetry used in The Book of Pooh (2001) is based off a Japanese style called bunraku.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Animation Lookback: Walt Disney Animation Studios +: Part 5 (2020)
- How many seasons does The Book of Pooh have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Boken om Nalle Puh
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content