Philip K. Dick stories continue to inspire filmmakers, writers, technophiles and philosophers. And for the last ten years of his life, he inhabited a stranger reality than the fiction he cre... Read allPhilip K. Dick stories continue to inspire filmmakers, writers, technophiles and philosophers. And for the last ten years of his life, he inhabited a stranger reality than the fiction he created.Philip K. Dick stories continue to inspire filmmakers, writers, technophiles and philosophers. And for the last ten years of his life, he inhabited a stranger reality than the fiction he created.
4.6296
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Fans Only Need Watch Or If You Don't Know Dick Now, You Still Won't
Rambling chatter about Philip K Dick, best known for the novels that became Minority Report, Blade Runner and Screamers. The chatter is loosely grouped together by subject but it drifts back and forth through many subjects. Its interesting to listen to but a bit tough to watch.
The trouble is that this is nothing more than interviews with people who knew Dick talking, inter-cut with some audio interview footage spiced up with cartoon of Dick at the typewriter. There is almost nothing other than the interviews themselves, no photos, some fleeting shots of printed material and of the outside of Dick's house. There is no narration, no attempt to explain any of the works he wrote or of his life, its simply remembrances that will mean nothing to anyone who has never read any of his books or, more importantly, never heard any of the stories of the man. My Dad who watched this with me was totally bewildered because he didn't know about Dick's life.
If you want an introduction to Philip K Dick and his work go somewhere else, this will put you off him forever. If you already know the man you may want to rent this, and then do something else while listening to it since its a dull thing to watch, but an interesting thing to listen to since the stories told are quite funny assuming you have some context to understand the craziness of them.
The trouble is that this is nothing more than interviews with people who knew Dick talking, inter-cut with some audio interview footage spiced up with cartoon of Dick at the typewriter. There is almost nothing other than the interviews themselves, no photos, some fleeting shots of printed material and of the outside of Dick's house. There is no narration, no attempt to explain any of the works he wrote or of his life, its simply remembrances that will mean nothing to anyone who has never read any of his books or, more importantly, never heard any of the stories of the man. My Dad who watched this with me was totally bewildered because he didn't know about Dick's life.
If you want an introduction to Philip K Dick and his work go somewhere else, this will put you off him forever. If you already know the man you may want to rent this, and then do something else while listening to it since its a dull thing to watch, but an interesting thing to listen to since the stories told are quite funny assuming you have some context to understand the craziness of them.
Recommended but flawed
This documentary explores the life and work of Philip K. Dick (PKD), a unique writer whose mindbending work and concepts have had much influence in films inspired by his work such as "Total Recall' and "Blade Runner" to "The Matrix" and "Fight Club".
Unfortunately though it deserves an A for Effort, this film is flawed in a number of ways.
Nothing of Dick's background is revealed, the film focuses more on the latter years and 1974 Gnostic religious experience of Dick than on his early life, and this is to the film's detriment as clues to these events could might lie in his formative years. As the previous reviewer noted, the same rhythm and animated sequence of PKD sitting at his typewriter are repeated endlessly over old audio recordings of Dick's interviews
I would like to have seen more of Dick's associates and family interviewed, and more of the feel of an overall biography.
Unfortunately though it deserves an A for Effort, this film is flawed in a number of ways.
Nothing of Dick's background is revealed, the film focuses more on the latter years and 1974 Gnostic religious experience of Dick than on his early life, and this is to the film's detriment as clues to these events could might lie in his formative years. As the previous reviewer noted, the same rhythm and animated sequence of PKD sitting at his typewriter are repeated endlessly over old audio recordings of Dick's interviews
I would like to have seen more of Dick's associates and family interviewed, and more of the feel of an overall biography.
interesting subject...inept film-making
After watching this "film" i was moved to seek out the fiction of
Phillip K. Dick.
So that's a good thing....Dick comes of as an interesting writer
worthy of further study.
The filmmakers, however, have assembled the material within in
such a fey, self-satisfied and fanboy-esque ineptitude that i found
myself, after a time, staring out the window and listening, rather
than watching the amateurishly-assembled and shot interview
footage or (especially) the amazingly ill-conceived "animated"
scene breaks. The people responsible for this have no idea of
film-making or pacing; had they no idea of how the silly, repetitive
"animated" scene breaks would grind everything to a halt? Jesus.
If you want to learn more about Dick, fine...you can get some idea
from the material within. But, as film-making, this is an amateurish
embarrassment.
Phillip K. Dick.
So that's a good thing....Dick comes of as an interesting writer
worthy of further study.
The filmmakers, however, have assembled the material within in
such a fey, self-satisfied and fanboy-esque ineptitude that i found
myself, after a time, staring out the window and listening, rather
than watching the amateurishly-assembled and shot interview
footage or (especially) the amazingly ill-conceived "animated"
scene breaks. The people responsible for this have no idea of
film-making or pacing; had they no idea of how the silly, repetitive
"animated" scene breaks would grind everything to a halt? Jesus.
If you want to learn more about Dick, fine...you can get some idea
from the material within. But, as film-making, this is an amateurish
embarrassment.
Informative, but not that good
If I weren't already a PKD fan, and have read more than a dozen of his novels, this docuflick would do absolutely nothing for me.
There is only about six or seven different interviewees, with scant biographical information. Cut scenes between interviews are overly long, and an annoying techno soundtrack makes archival audio from PKD inaudible.
While it was certainly informative, it could have been edited better, and could have been more broad.
This is something that diehard PKD fans will enjoy, but don't expect the kind of documentary quality that "Roger and Me" and "Sense of Life" convey. For all its flaws, still worth a look.
There is only about six or seven different interviewees, with scant biographical information. Cut scenes between interviews are overly long, and an annoying techno soundtrack makes archival audio from PKD inaudible.
While it was certainly informative, it could have been edited better, and could have been more broad.
This is something that diehard PKD fans will enjoy, but don't expect the kind of documentary quality that "Roger and Me" and "Sense of Life" convey. For all its flaws, still worth a look.
Disappointing documentary for fans
Poor documentary of this sci-fi great explores houses he used to live in here in the bay area (with the webmasters of PKD websites as guides) and other irrelevant details while failing to really explore what makes his writing unique. But then, if I wanted to know that, I guess I'd pick up one of his books (which I often like to do). This film is for people who are not Philip K. Dick fans, but might have seen "Total Recall" or "Blade Runner" or "Minority Report" (the worst one yet.... or wasn't there something with Gary Senise or whatever his name is? Hopefully that got shelved) and they want to know what this guy's about, but they don't know how to read. For those people and no one else, this film is recommended.
Not recommended for fans of PKD: you won't find out anything you don't already know.
p.s. just reading through my comments from years ago here in 2008 and wanted to point out that I did actually see "Imposter" with Gary Sinise and it was one of the more decent Philip Dick movies relatively speaking. At least Sinise isn't some kind of superman or supermodel, he looks like a "dickian" hero.
Not recommended for fans of PKD: you won't find out anything you don't already know.
p.s. just reading through my comments from years ago here in 2008 and wanted to point out that I did actually see "Imposter" with Gary Sinise and it was one of the more decent Philip Dick movies relatively speaking. At least Sinise isn't some kind of superman or supermodel, he looks like a "dickian" hero.
Did you know
- ConnectionsReferences Blade Runner (1982)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Il vangelo secondo Philip K. Dick
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $582
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $582
- Mar 4, 2001
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
