Birds of Paradise

As has been said by me many times, am a huge fan of animation. Always have been, always will be, so naturally will see any animated film regardless of age, how high budget or not it is and the studio/director it comes from.

There are far better animated films than 'Birds of Paradise', naming them however would be unfair but many are likely to put forward the best of Disney and Pixar. There are also infinitely worse, at least with 'Birds of Paradise' some effort was put into it which is more than can be said with far more amateurish efforts like Video Brinquedo and Spark Plug Entertainment. 'Birds of Paradise' may not be one's definition of paradise, but it is a long way from hell.

'Birds of Paradise' has good elements. The voice cast are mostly quite accomplished. Ken Jeong and Jon Lovitz give fun comic relief and there are distinguished contributions from Jane Lynch and Keith David. Ashley Tisdale does much more than just constantly screaming at the top of her lungs and shouting her lines, while not always subtle her voice work is more dynamic than that.

It also starts off well with a vibrant and energetic opening that shows a lot of promise, and there is a good deal of energy in the first half or so. The music has colour and infectious groove that fits well and the positive messaging the film has was delivered well and will be appreciated by kids and adults alike regardless of their familiarity. Some of the comic relief is fun.

However, the animation itself isn't too great. Some nice colours here and there but there is a lack of refinement and attention to detail can be static. Worst of all are the blocky and unnatural character designs, the characters were described elsewhere as looking like chicken wings doused in brightly coloured dye reminiscent of the Easter period, as funny as this sounds that sums up the character designs aptly.

While most of the voice cast are fine, Drake Bell overdoes it and is neither sympathetic or fun. He does fail to convey a shred of sympathy or charm for a character written so shallowly that rooting for him, his quest or his lukewarm at best chemistry with Aurora was difficult. The story is very standard fare and gets flimsier and flimsier after a promising opening, it also takes a gloomier tone in the second half and tonally it's too jarringly uneven. The script is neither awful or brilliant, just middle of the road bland.

Overall, has enough to make it watchable but less than heavenly. 5/10 Bethany Cox

Overall? I liked it.

What I liked?

I watched it with the original voices - made in Argentina - with English subtitles - I insist to do this. These voices are very colorful.

There were some very catchy and clever dialogues or scenes like bats saying "i am not Bruce Wayne, I am not Bruce Wayne".

Graphics found them nice. Yeah, it is not 4k hd but it is ok. They are cute. Remember, it was made in Argentina in 2010 and not in a big studio.

There is also good music and some good songs.

What i didnt like The scenario was a little weak in some points. There was no the "sounding, screaming, crazy" action of disney-like movies. It had some powerful messages against the captivity of animals. As well some political "rebellion messages".

Generally, it was a joyful film to watch and provided some "food for thought" for both children and grown humans.

Jack (Drake Bell) is a plain sparrow and the girls ignore him in favor for the flashier birds. Aurora (Ashley Tisdale) is a prized captive yellow canary of a ruthless corporate tycoon. She manages to escape and is befriended by Jack and others.

The colors are gawdy rather than being beautiful. The animation is good for the 90s at best. The design is blocky. There is some blurring which I hope is the result of converting between 3D and 2D. The story is the only functional aspect. It's about being yourself and that's always good family fare. This is really old school and not in a good way.