A dozen years after the Civil War, former slaves go on strike at a powerful judge's plantation.A dozen years after the Civil War, former slaves go on strike at a powerful judge's plantation.A dozen years after the Civil War, former slaves go on strike at a powerful judge's plantation.
R.J. Atkins
- Cotton Field Worker
- (as Rickey Atkins Jr.)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
4.9959
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Western With an Edge
I just went to Blockbuster to find a film and came up with this one. The western genre drew me in, so I decided I'd give it a shot. I'd agree with the other post that this is certainly not your regular western, but I tended to like the extra edge it provided. It's not for young children, or for folks who are bothered with scenes presenting violent conflicts, but it left me wondering what would I do it a similar situation. Overall, I thought Eric Braeden did a great job as did George Kennedy. But I thought the real show stealer was Billy Zane. His characterization was worth the price of admission. The female roles were fun to watch too. Carol Alt was great, Sean Young did a good job of presenting a pretty interesting character, but on the female side, I was most impressed with Jennifer O'Dell. I really believe she is up and coming.
Nasty, misogynistic, and unrealistic - not worth watching.
It's very misleading to say, "...this really is a great western". It's anything but. If it is (to quote another reviewer) "the best (they) have seen in a while", then I'd recommend watching a few good ones. There are plenty, but this film doesn't qualify. Nor is it a "classic western revenge movie" (try "Ride Lonesome"). It's an excuse for a lot of quite predictable bloodshed, masquerading as some kind of historical comment, and for some nasty misogyny. The movie strives for political correctness, at least racially, but misses the boat completely where the female characters are concerned. They simply get raped and brutalized. It's unrealistic, too; everyone, including field hands, is far too clean, and there's no feeling of authenticity. The direction's adequate at best; there are far too many lingering shots of the star's face (he's too old for the role anyway).
As for being based on the Thibodeaux Massacre of 1887, as the final comments indicate, it bears little resemblance to that event - but then, it's not actually about injustice to black field hands, it's about the white guys, as usual. The black characters are just there to die on the "hero"'s behalf, as the women are there to be raped. As long as he can stagger to the final showdown, they've played their part in this miserable vehicle for an aging soap opera heartthrob.
Forget it. It might please fans of the soap in question, or kids, but that's all it's good for.
As for being based on the Thibodeaux Massacre of 1887, as the final comments indicate, it bears little resemblance to that event - but then, it's not actually about injustice to black field hands, it's about the white guys, as usual. The black characters are just there to die on the "hero"'s behalf, as the women are there to be raped. As long as he can stagger to the final showdown, they've played their part in this miserable vehicle for an aging soap opera heartthrob.
Forget it. It might please fans of the soap in question, or kids, but that's all it's good for.
The movie is twice as lame as the title.
This is an example of welfare for once famous actors. Poorly written, directed, and videotaped, with one dimensional caricatures, instead of characters, who are used as plot pawns to advance a story that is so obvious, you see what is coming from the next county.
I gave it a view, as I do all western type films, because it is a uniquely American genre that I wish would be rediscovered by present day film makers.
A simple story, about a slower pace of time, doesn't have to be obvious and contrived, it can ring true and be compelling, but this effort is simply not up to the task.
I gave it a view, as I do all western type films, because it is a uniquely American genre that I wish would be rediscovered by present day film makers.
A simple story, about a slower pace of time, doesn't have to be obvious and contrived, it can ring true and be compelling, but this effort is simply not up to the task.
The Last Western - Hopefully
On the surface it appears this had the potential to be a good movie. The setting Thibodaux, LA or Lafourche Parish where a large strike took place in the late 1800's. The material available to be successful but was not used (even if the project was to be fictional). However, we end up with the common good cause stands against evil cause scenario. The acting does not support credibility of occurrences (in the movie plot nor the historical strike). The scenes are weak and at times seem to try to portray a point but fail and at times leave the watcher with what does this have to do with anything. The actor's dialogs seem forced with little emotion and the action scenes are walked through with no fluidity or realism. The best acting in the movie is performed by the undertaker - a couple of short scenes. Can we have a refund or exchange?
The Thibodaux Massacre
The black laborers on George Kennedy's plantation go on strike. It's put down violently. Compassionate overseer Eric Braeden winds up in prison. He escapes and returns for vengeance,
It's based on the agricultural labor strike organized by the Knights of Labor, and involved as many as 10,000 workers in four parishes in Louisiana. The plantation owners persuaded the governor to call in the militia to protect the strikebreakers. The striking workers were evicted and retreated to Thibodaux, where violence began on November 21, and erupted into the Thibodaux Massacre two days later. Estimates of death range from 35 to 50, al of them Black. Killed, wounded and missing were in the hundreds.
Given that background, this movie about the White people involved seems a bit off; there are many Black actors, but in small or supporting roles. More central to the story are White actors like Billy Zane, Carol Alt, Sean Young, and Armand Assante, and the movie is a very violent one.
It's based on the agricultural labor strike organized by the Knights of Labor, and involved as many as 10,000 workers in four parishes in Louisiana. The plantation owners persuaded the governor to call in the militia to protect the strikebreakers. The striking workers were evicted and retreated to Thibodaux, where violence began on November 21, and erupted into the Thibodaux Massacre two days later. Estimates of death range from 35 to 50, al of them Black. Killed, wounded and missing were in the hundreds.
Given that background, this movie about the White people involved seems a bit off; there are many Black actors, but in small or supporting roles. More central to the story are White actors like Billy Zane, Carol Alt, Sean Young, and Armand Assante, and the movie is a very violent one.
Did you know
- TriviaGary Raymond, who co-starred with Eric Braeden in The Rat Patrol, appeared in an episode of UFO titled The Man Who Came Back.
- GoofsWhen the Warden is hiding behind a tree during the massacre, waiting for Reese, his left trigger finger is on the trigger of his Henry rifle, but in the next shot, his Right trigger finger is on the trigger.
- SoundtracksThe Times Be Very Hard
Written by Erik Janson and Craig Ferguson
Performed by Erik Janson and Melany Bell
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $5,000,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 52m(112 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content







