A young Robert Langdon must solve a series of deadly puzzles to save his kidnapped mentor and thwart a chilling global conspiracy.A young Robert Langdon must solve a series of deadly puzzles to save his kidnapped mentor and thwart a chilling global conspiracy.A young Robert Langdon must solve a series of deadly puzzles to save his kidnapped mentor and thwart a chilling global conspiracy.
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
There's a good amount of intrigue mixed with a bit of WTF? Just one note for NBC/Universal: THERE SHOULD NOT BE AN APOSTROPHE IN "It's cryptic text..."! The opening frame of the show, and somebody needs an editor.
You haven't read the book then it's fine for what it is. If you like mystery and a bit of adventure then you should watch it. The acting is fine, the story is good and overall it's entertaining.
But if you have read the books, going by other reviews I guess, you shouldn't watch it. Or maybe you should and make up your own mind.
But if you have read the books, going by other reviews I guess, you shouldn't watch it. Or maybe you should and make up your own mind.
No it's not a polished Hollywood movie with lots of money and famous faces but it is entertaining and worth your time...if there's nothing better to do.
Update: I'm glad I ignored the negative reviews because it got better as I watched, take the time and judge for yourself.
Update: I'm glad I ignored the negative reviews because it got better as I watched, take the time and judge for yourself.
A young Robert Langdon is drawn into an ancient mystery when his mentor is kidnapped.
I really liked the lead, Ashley Zukerman, he played it serious, geeky and smart. No one else in the cast really stood out.
I also really liked the symbolic mystery-solving elements of the plot line, i.e. The traditional Langdon material, but the rest was mediocre US television drama.
The early episodes were good with the focus being on symbols and mysteries but then degenerates into any other unexceptional box set. For Langdon super fans only, I think.
I really liked the lead, Ashley Zukerman, he played it serious, geeky and smart. No one else in the cast really stood out.
I also really liked the symbolic mystery-solving elements of the plot line, i.e. The traditional Langdon material, but the rest was mediocre US television drama.
The early episodes were good with the focus being on symbols and mysteries but then degenerates into any other unexceptional box set. For Langdon super fans only, I think.
I was so looking forward to this , and i am so disappointed , Acting off, Eddie Izzards cut off hand is so fake that a child could have done it better , and most characters just feel off , except the night guard , he is spot on.
Did you know
- TriviaBased on 'The Lost Symbol', Dan Brown's third book in his Robert Langdon series. Sony planned to adapt the book as the third movie in the movie franchise early in the 2010s, following The Da Vinci Code (2006) and Angels & Demons (2009). However, production of that adaptation became too complicated as Ron Howard preferred to only produce it rather than directing, and Tom Hanks would not be returning as Professor Robert Langdon. In the end, the production took so long that the novel 'Inferno' was released in 2013, and Sony decided to skip 'The Lost Symbol' and make Inferno (2016) instead, for which most of the crew of the previous films returned, including Howard as director and Hanks as the main character. Because the series is a prequel to the movies, Hanks was replaced as the younger Langdon with Ashley Zukerman, but Brown, Howard and franchise producer Brian Grazer have remained on board as executive producers.
- How many seasons does The Lost Symbol have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Languages
- Also known as
- Dan Brown's the Lost Symbol
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content