Two unlikely heroes must learn to work together in order to unravel the conspiracy behind an alien menace.Two unlikely heroes must learn to work together in order to unravel the conspiracy behind an alien menace.Two unlikely heroes must learn to work together in order to unravel the conspiracy behind an alien menace.
Shawn Vincent
- Rambler
- (as Shawn Davison Vincent)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I had the opportunity to sit down and watch the 2019 movie "Forcefury" here in 2021. Sure, I hadn't heard about it, and I had to look it up here on IMDb as I wanted to see what it had been rated. And I must admit that with the movie's cover and the high rating the movie had gotten, then of course this was something that I just had to watch.
And let me just tell you that "Forcefury" is bad. It is really, really bad. In fact, "Forcefury" is so bad that it actually is a great movie and a very fun movie to watch. It is just one of those instances where everything is so campy, cheese and low budget that it actually works well in favor of the movie as a whole. But of course, a movie such as "Forcefury" is not one that I think will find appeal with just everyone in the audience. So you need to have a liking for really dubious movies in order to enjoy this movie from writers Daniel McLeod and Matthew Mousseau.
Now, "Forcefury" is low budget. Very low budget. But it actually works out nicely, especially so as it is so far out there and so ridiculous that you just can't help to enjoy it.
The acting in the movie was dubious. Of course it was, but again, this was something that worked well in favor of the overall feel of the movie. Especially because Matthew Mousseau (playing Brick Forcefury) put on such a hilariously bad performance that he singlehandedly carried most of the movie.
This is definitely an enjoyable and feel-good movie. And it most certainly seems like it is a movie that the cast and crew had a blast making.
Don't expect CGI or visual effects that are spectacular here. Sure, they had an effects department, of sorts. But prepare yourself for alien latex masks bought at the local Halloween store, and effects that are suitable for an early 1990s computer game.
My rating of "Forcefury" is a six out of ten stars, and it is movie that I would recommend you give a chance, should you have the opportunity to sit down to watch it. I was more than genuinely entertained by what director Daniel McLeod dished out here.
And let me just tell you that "Forcefury" is bad. It is really, really bad. In fact, "Forcefury" is so bad that it actually is a great movie and a very fun movie to watch. It is just one of those instances where everything is so campy, cheese and low budget that it actually works well in favor of the movie as a whole. But of course, a movie such as "Forcefury" is not one that I think will find appeal with just everyone in the audience. So you need to have a liking for really dubious movies in order to enjoy this movie from writers Daniel McLeod and Matthew Mousseau.
Now, "Forcefury" is low budget. Very low budget. But it actually works out nicely, especially so as it is so far out there and so ridiculous that you just can't help to enjoy it.
The acting in the movie was dubious. Of course it was, but again, this was something that worked well in favor of the overall feel of the movie. Especially because Matthew Mousseau (playing Brick Forcefury) put on such a hilariously bad performance that he singlehandedly carried most of the movie.
This is definitely an enjoyable and feel-good movie. And it most certainly seems like it is a movie that the cast and crew had a blast making.
Don't expect CGI or visual effects that are spectacular here. Sure, they had an effects department, of sorts. But prepare yourself for alien latex masks bought at the local Halloween store, and effects that are suitable for an early 1990s computer game.
My rating of "Forcefury" is a six out of ten stars, and it is movie that I would recommend you give a chance, should you have the opportunity to sit down to watch it. I was more than genuinely entertained by what director Daniel McLeod dished out here.
This movie is fantastic. Cult classic for sure. One day it will be released by the The Criterion Collection. Mark my words. It's hilarious.
Find it and watch it with a lil your friends. It's usually free on a bunch of places like Tubi. The effects are on par with a Troma film but the comedy is next level.
Below is nonsensical extra words, just so that I could post the above part to tell you to watch this movie. If you don't laugh your probably a robot or a really serious person like dolly j trump.
Two border security agents must learn to work together in order to unravel the conspiracy behind an alien menace. Strong film review balances insightful analysis with clear writing, avoiding spoilers and helping the reader decide if the movie is worth their time. It should explore aspects like plot, acting, direction, and cinematography, while also reflecting on the film's emotional impact. A good review might discuss how the film made the reviewer feel, particularly if it was a powerful or unique experience.
Here's a breakdown of what makes a good review: Balanced Perspective: A good review acknowledges both the film's strengths and weaknesses.
Insightful Commentary: It goes beyond simple plot summaries, offering observations about the film's artistry and themes.
Reader-Focused: It helps the reader understand what the film is about and whether it aligns with their interests.
Avoidance of Spoilers: It respects the audience's desire to experience the film's twists and turns without knowing them in advance.
Emotional Impact: It considers how the film made the reviewer feel, both during and after watching.
Specific Examples: It uses specific scenes or moments to illustrate points about acting, direction, or cinematography.
Clear and Concise Language: It is written in a way that is easy to understand and engage with.
Respectful and Objective: It avoids being overly critical or subjective without supporting evidence.
Example: Let's consider a review of "Forrest Gump." A good review might start by acknowledging the film's enduring popularity and its ability to evoke strong emotions. It could then delve into the performances of Tom Hanks and Robin Wright, highlighting their chemistry and how it enhances the story. The review might also discuss the film's use of historical events and how they contribute to Forrest's journey, while also mentioning the film's strengths and weaknesses, such as t.
Find it and watch it with a lil your friends. It's usually free on a bunch of places like Tubi. The effects are on par with a Troma film but the comedy is next level.
Below is nonsensical extra words, just so that I could post the above part to tell you to watch this movie. If you don't laugh your probably a robot or a really serious person like dolly j trump.
Two border security agents must learn to work together in order to unravel the conspiracy behind an alien menace. Strong film review balances insightful analysis with clear writing, avoiding spoilers and helping the reader decide if the movie is worth their time. It should explore aspects like plot, acting, direction, and cinematography, while also reflecting on the film's emotional impact. A good review might discuss how the film made the reviewer feel, particularly if it was a powerful or unique experience.
Here's a breakdown of what makes a good review: Balanced Perspective: A good review acknowledges both the film's strengths and weaknesses.
Insightful Commentary: It goes beyond simple plot summaries, offering observations about the film's artistry and themes.
Reader-Focused: It helps the reader understand what the film is about and whether it aligns with their interests.
Avoidance of Spoilers: It respects the audience's desire to experience the film's twists and turns without knowing them in advance.
Emotional Impact: It considers how the film made the reviewer feel, both during and after watching.
Specific Examples: It uses specific scenes or moments to illustrate points about acting, direction, or cinematography.
Clear and Concise Language: It is written in a way that is easy to understand and engage with.
Respectful and Objective: It avoids being overly critical or subjective without supporting evidence.
Example: Let's consider a review of "Forrest Gump." A good review might start by acknowledging the film's enduring popularity and its ability to evoke strong emotions. It could then delve into the performances of Tom Hanks and Robin Wright, highlighting their chemistry and how it enhances the story. The review might also discuss the film's use of historical events and how they contribute to Forrest's journey, while also mentioning the film's strengths and weaknesses, such as t.
This is horrible. I only got a single laugh, and don't think it was meant to be.
Green alien make up the girl's face, but not the arms or feet.
Green alien make up the girl's face, but not the arms or feet.
Hey, coulda been worse.
For a first-feature with no real budget, I think it turned out pretty well.
For a first-feature with no real budget, I think it turned out pretty well.
Did you know
- Trivia5 different cameras were used during shooting, specifically the Panasonic GH4, Sony FS5, Canon 5D Mark 2, Nikon D5200, and a Samsung Galaxy S8 cell phone.
- ConnectionsReferences Kiss Me Deadly (1955)
- SoundtracksDon't Talk To Girls
Written by James Downham
Performed by James Downham
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Filming locations
- Kitchener, Ontario, Canada(Tannery Building)
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- CA$50,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 20 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content