Bakers make different goodies using chocolate.Bakers make different goodies using chocolate.Bakers make different goodies using chocolate.
- Awards
- 3 nominations total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
So far, this show is a string of every cooking competition cliche ever--they seriously haven't missed a one. And all the host's dialogue is written so insultingly simply it's like they think their audience has negative IQs. The contestants are nothing more than manufactured stereotypes that tick every demographic box possible. The hosts are stiff and wooden and I don't believe ONE SINGLE THING that happens this show is true or uncalculated, not what the contestants are "choosing" to bake on their own (yeah, sure) right down to what they say their names are. An entirely calculated cash-in that treats its viewers like morons.
If it's truly a Canadian show then why r their more Americans then Canadian s and why hasn't a Canadian won it.. Purdy chocolate is the chocolate that used u advertised that it's Canadian but can't say I agree with that anymore this season only 2 Canadian s made it to the top 6 and the 3 were all Americans that were in the showdown.. and someone from again America won it..
How do you stand out from the glut of cooking contest shows on TV? Not by directing your judges and contestants to resort to a low common denominator of overblown, cartonnish, childish, saccharine expressions and rhetoric. It's annoying and most seriously, demeaning to all involved and their well taught and hard won creations. The editing reinforces this unrefined treacle with jump cuts that turn the participant's reactions into sterotypes. For example, take the overcute exceessively repeated «snap» test for well-tempered chocolate. Anna Olsen is the only one of the three judges who manages to speak consistently in genuine, learned, communicative, measured tones. I urge the creators of the show to relax and tamp down the phoney feel of their final product.
Unfortunately I will not be watching all the episodes. I've watched 4, and have completely lost interest. I watch every competitive baking show I can find, but what keeps me interested is the hosts for starters. While the hosts/judges are extremely talented, they have no personality whatsoever. I like fun, humor, competitiveness in a show. The show itself is boring unfortunately, and doesn't keep my interest. And the what the contestants have baked so far, are not competition worthy in my opinion. Let's get some excitement in here!!! Let's get some judges that make you want to continue watching!!
I hate these live action competition shows. They usually pit people against each other showcasing not talents but petty meanness that we adults thought we left behind in sixth grade. Not so with the Great Chocolate Showdown. The contestants are amazing bakers who all seem to be genuinely nice people. People you actually would love to sit down with to discuss making macarons and what temperature is best for making chocolate not get all weirdly ashy looking.
Did I say talented? No. These people have skills that are impressive.
The downside of the show is the blandness of the judges. I liked that the reviews were honest yet not brutal like Gordon Ramsey, that man makes me cry for the contestants. But it still needs...something...not meanness but a little edge.
Overall it has made tv watching on Saturday night relaxing and fun.
Did I say talented? No. These people have skills that are impressive.
The downside of the show is the blandness of the judges. I liked that the reviews were honest yet not brutal like Gordon Ramsey, that man makes me cry for the contestants. But it still needs...something...not meanness but a little edge.
Overall it has made tv watching on Saturday night relaxing and fun.
- How many seasons does Great Chocolate Showdown have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime
- 1 hour
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content