IMDb RATING
5.9/10
4.1K
YOUR RATING
An intriguing exploration of seduction, forbidden love, and redemption, a captivating and passionate tale of one man's escape from his own personal hell as he tries to earn the impossible: f... Read allAn intriguing exploration of seduction, forbidden love, and redemption, a captivating and passionate tale of one man's escape from his own personal hell as he tries to earn the impossible: forgiveness and love.An intriguing exploration of seduction, forbidden love, and redemption, a captivating and passionate tale of one man's escape from his own personal hell as he tries to earn the impossible: forgiveness and love.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
When I heard that the trio of Gabriel's Inferno (by Sylvain Reynard) was going to be adapted for the screens by Passionflix, I was worried. I had never heard of the platform and was afraid that the production was not on the same level as the big studios. The reality proved to be totally different and the luxury production did not owe anything to the great Hollywood artists. The production, casting, direction, script, photography, soundtrack, everything was perfect in this film, with a big difference from most adaptations: respect for the book and the readers because it was the most perfect adaptation of a book I have ever seen. Wonderful, wonderful work, congratulations to all involved. I will stop writing this review because I already want to watch the movie again.
OK this one takes the cake as the most faked positive rated film on IMDB. Just click any of the positive reviews and you will see up there in "lifetime total" number of reviews on IMDB for the reviewers' IMDB history as one film.
Everything about this film is awful. the dialogue, the plot, the acting, all cringeworthy.
It was an awesome book and so is the movie. Everybody should watch it and read it as well.
All the characters and their acting are so beautiful and it makes the movie more exquisite.
Waiting for Part two😊
Waiting for Part two😊
I usually think twice before posting a critical review, but I believe that a review should be always honest and I honestly didn't enjoy this movie very much (or part 2, or 3, which had just more of the same). I know that Passionflix wanted to bring an adaption true to the book to the screen, but unfortunately this movie proves that it doesn't always work like that. Books and movies are different mediums, and what works on the page doesn't always work on the screen.
Even if the actors looked their parts, especially Giulio Berruti as Gabriel Emerson, it wasn't enough to convince me. I really tried not to allow myself to be distracted by his slight Italian accent, but it just kept disturbing me on top of his relatively wooden performance. I can't help it, but a voice and subsequently an actor's accent are a huge thing for me and can either win me over or make me dislike a character altogether. I know that he put a lot of effort into his performance and I value that, but it still didn't do the trick for me in the end. The same goes for Julia, played by Melanie Zanetti. She might have the doe-like appearance required for the virginal leading lady, but her endless staring from her big brown eyes, then constantly lowering her gaze and biting her lip. It all just got old quickly. I was also missing the internal monologues from the book, which added a lot of humour and additional insight to the story. So many scenes just had Gabriel and Julia staring meaningfully at each other, and while the readers knew what was going on inside the characters' heads, it still looked awkward, like they didn't really know what to do except stare and then stare a little bit more. Maybe a voice-over narrator could have added some extra flavour to those scenes.
The one I liked the most was actually Rachel, Julia Barrett-Mitchell. She was positively refreshing and came across really natural. I didn't particularly care much for Paul, played by James Fraser, but that's probably because he didn't have a likeable personality in the book to begin with. I mean, who calls a girl he's interested in 'rabbit'? That's really condescending and would be a personal turnoff for me.
Overall, the movie left me unsatisfied as it felt largely life- and bloodless, like an insipid meal missing the essential spices. I'm well aware that Passionflix is a small and relatively new company aiming to bring romance books to the TV-screen, so the budget is considerably smaller than other companies have at their disposal, but that doesn't mean that one cannot also bring something artistic to life even on a tight budget. Unfortunately, this movie was not a raging inferno of passion, but just a few meagerly flickering embers.
Even if the actors looked their parts, especially Giulio Berruti as Gabriel Emerson, it wasn't enough to convince me. I really tried not to allow myself to be distracted by his slight Italian accent, but it just kept disturbing me on top of his relatively wooden performance. I can't help it, but a voice and subsequently an actor's accent are a huge thing for me and can either win me over or make me dislike a character altogether. I know that he put a lot of effort into his performance and I value that, but it still didn't do the trick for me in the end. The same goes for Julia, played by Melanie Zanetti. She might have the doe-like appearance required for the virginal leading lady, but her endless staring from her big brown eyes, then constantly lowering her gaze and biting her lip. It all just got old quickly. I was also missing the internal monologues from the book, which added a lot of humour and additional insight to the story. So many scenes just had Gabriel and Julia staring meaningfully at each other, and while the readers knew what was going on inside the characters' heads, it still looked awkward, like they didn't really know what to do except stare and then stare a little bit more. Maybe a voice-over narrator could have added some extra flavour to those scenes.
The one I liked the most was actually Rachel, Julia Barrett-Mitchell. She was positively refreshing and came across really natural. I didn't particularly care much for Paul, played by James Fraser, but that's probably because he didn't have a likeable personality in the book to begin with. I mean, who calls a girl he's interested in 'rabbit'? That's really condescending and would be a personal turnoff for me.
Overall, the movie left me unsatisfied as it felt largely life- and bloodless, like an insipid meal missing the essential spices. I'm well aware that Passionflix is a small and relatively new company aiming to bring romance books to the TV-screen, so the budget is considerably smaller than other companies have at their disposal, but that doesn't mean that one cannot also bring something artistic to life even on a tight budget. Unfortunately, this movie was not a raging inferno of passion, but just a few meagerly flickering embers.
Passionflix did a great job casting and adapting the book. If you've read the series many times like I have, you will notice the adjustments/creative licenses, but overall it's a very good movie. I am looking forward to seeing the rest of the story come to life in the subsequent parts.
Did you know
- TriviaThe Gabriel's Inferno movie was originally over 5 hours long, in order to reduce the run-time the movie was eventually cut into 3 separate parts, part 1 of the movie which only covers the first 1/3 of the first book was released in May 2020, part 2 which continues the story was released on 31 July, and part 3 which finishes the first book was released on 19 November.
- ConnectionsFollowed by Gabriel's Inferno: Part Two (2020)
- How long is Gabriel's Inferno: Part One?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Gabriel's Inferno: Part 1
- Filming locations
- Syracuse, New York, USA(Syracuse, NY)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 2h 4m(124 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content