Toby Fleishman knew what to expect when he and his wife of almost 15 years separated: weekends and every other holiday with the kids, some residual bitterness, and the occasional moment of t... Read allToby Fleishman knew what to expect when he and his wife of almost 15 years separated: weekends and every other holiday with the kids, some residual bitterness, and the occasional moment of tension in their co-parenting negotiations.Toby Fleishman knew what to expect when he and his wife of almost 15 years separated: weekends and every other holiday with the kids, some residual bitterness, and the occasional moment of tension in their co-parenting negotiations.
- Nominated for 7 Primetime Emmys
- 2 wins & 19 nominations total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
After a clunky first episode (I'd give it a 6/10), the thing that keeps impressing me about this series is that it presents everything both subjectively but fairly. Characters that were introduced as one dimensional, eventually get their due. Some of them are very unlikable, they are all flawed as hell, but that's what makes this series worthwhile. Its not a bunch of paragons you can't relate to. We are all flawed people, and letting yourself root for them despite that provides a self-reflective catharsis.
Jesse Eisenberg turns in a good, but not boundary stretching performance. Claire Danes provides a sympathetic villain. And the writing is very good, but IMHO doesn't quite get men right (but it's very close).
Jesse Eisenberg turns in a good, but not boundary stretching performance. Claire Danes provides a sympathetic villain. And the writing is very good, but IMHO doesn't quite get men right (but it's very close).
10mrfrane
There are legitimate complaints in the reviews about how much the story revolves around Fleishman, the man in the divorce. But it's a story that unfolds over time. There are multiple characters at the core of the story and they each have arcs to play out. I, for one, was fascinated to see how my perspective changed as each episode played out and the point of view shifted, and there were revelations. Oh, boy, were there revelations.
Put it this way, whoever produced this program did not spend all that money on Claire Danes to have her be defined by everyone else. And keep an eye on Meara Mahoney Gross, who plays the Fleishmans' young daughter.
Put it this way, whoever produced this program did not spend all that money on Claire Danes to have her be defined by everyone else. And keep an eye on Meara Mahoney Gross, who plays the Fleishmans' young daughter.
I started watching this because I love Claire Danes. After a couple episodes, I was ready to give it up: the episodes were meandering and mediocre, at best, and Danes was barely even in it. Then, I saw someone mention episode 7 and how amazing Danes' performance was. I decided to persevere.
The first six episodes were quite a slog of upper middle class navel gazing. I kept wondering what purpose the story really served. Did we really need to know about these people and their boring, privileged lives? I think that it was well acted, but the focus on Toby seemed a poor choice: he was the least interesting character in the series, to me. Episode 6 picked up a little, so I was hopeful about episodes 7 & 8.
Episode 7 was one of, if not the, best hours of television I've watched this year. Claire Danes was riveting. I related so much to her character. Just phenomenal. Episode 8, which focused on Libby was also very, very good. Both episodes together were a profoundly moving look at middle age for us younger Gen Xers.
I really wish the first 6 episodes had been condensed into 3. I also think Claire Danes and Adam Brody were criminally underutilized. If you can slog through the start, the payoff of episodes 7 & 8 is worth it.
The first six episodes were quite a slog of upper middle class navel gazing. I kept wondering what purpose the story really served. Did we really need to know about these people and their boring, privileged lives? I think that it was well acted, but the focus on Toby seemed a poor choice: he was the least interesting character in the series, to me. Episode 6 picked up a little, so I was hopeful about episodes 7 & 8.
Episode 7 was one of, if not the, best hours of television I've watched this year. Claire Danes was riveting. I related so much to her character. Just phenomenal. Episode 8, which focused on Libby was also very, very good. Both episodes together were a profoundly moving look at middle age for us younger Gen Xers.
I really wish the first 6 episodes had been condensed into 3. I also think Claire Danes and Adam Brody were criminally underutilized. If you can slog through the start, the payoff of episodes 7 & 8 is worth it.
Very well made in pretty much in every aspect maybe a little to fast paced and quite raunchy otherwise it's phenomenal! I love Jesse Eisenberg and Lizzy Caplin, I have enjoyed them for years. I absolutely love anything medical related especially House M. D and The Good Doctor. I'm baffled the series got hate it's well written, flows well, incredible acting and highly entertaining. My mom loves the series too she's 61 she recommend if she can enjoy this most should. Flemishman is in Trouble hits the spot to me to enjoy more than most although it reminds me how lonely I am I guess that's part of autism.
This is an amazing series. It is well-acted, well-cast, well-written, and well-directed. There's a lot to this series that should actually warrant a trigger warning for those who have been through family trauma, divorce, severe mental health issues, misogyny, sexual harassment, work trauma, people treating each other like garbage, death etc. It's difficult to list everything that happens in this series without giving spoilers, but it is anxiety-inducing, and traumatic, because the entire series is basically watching trauma in action and the history of that trauma. That being said, again, it is excellent, in it's craft - but for me, it will be a one time watch.
Did you know
- TriviaDuring a January 2023 interview with Tonya Mosley on the National Public Radio program Fresh Air, Taffy Brodesser-Akner confirmed that many of the main cast members were chosen at least partly because they were actors who had been well-known as teens and who were now middle-aged: "It was so intentional. It was--you know, there was this idea that these actors were too young to play these roles. I mean, Jesse Eisenberg, when we started talking about the adaptation, was only 36 years old. Luckily--and I mean that facetiously--the pandemic came along, and by the time. . . . [filming started, he was] 38--so we were able to rationalize that. But we had these choices. Did we want to cast people who were older who we could then look at as in a more authentic crisis of middle age? But the point of the book and the show are the beginnings of those crises. And also, this allowed us to have them play themselves in flashbacks. But most of all . . . if I don't, as a 40-year-old, yet understand what is happening to me in my life, the idea that Jesse Eisenberg--yes, from The Squid And The Whale, yes, from The Social Network--that it's happening to him, too, that it's happening to Claire Danes from My So-Called Life, that it's happening to--oh, my gosh--to Adam Brody [from The O.C.], to Lizzy Caplan [from Mean Girls], to Josh Radnor--all these people that we knew so well as very, very young people. It hits home for me so much to say, oh, my God, this is a force you cannot fight--if you're lucky. If you're lucky and you get to live, this is a force that you won't be able to fight. We're all going to get old."
- ConnectionsFeatured in Half in the Bag: 2022 Catch-up Part 2 (2023)
- How many seasons does Fleishman Is in Trouble have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime
- 48m
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content