User reviews

INGREDIENTS

One (1) of the Russians from 15 Minutes (but temper him till we can empathize--in this case with a standout performance by Ross Marquand that in many aspects leaves in the dust the rest of the community theater cast who get any real screen time, aside from a couple big-name-recognition cameos that do leave you wanting more).

One (1) Bob Woodward-like character from All the President's Men.

One (1) '70's parody detective character from Tom Jane's Stander.

One (1) Ed Harris-like, Fedora-wearing Parcher-based character from A Beautiful Mind.

One (1) Serpico look-alike good-guy-turned-bad-guy. Pinch (to taste) of generic, disposable "red-shirt" henchmen (or is it now "hench-people" or perhaps "hench-persons"?) extras.

DIRECTIONS

On a mise-en-scène stovetop with lighting inspired by the look and feel of Peckinpah's Wild Bunch, stir in the plot of the SciFi film Enemy Mine over very low heat, bind one character to a chair a la Reservoir Dogs (but "torture light," please…rest assured that no ears, or 'nads--"I get my kicks above the waistline, Sunshine!"--were harmed in the making of this movie). Add a touch of virtually any and all Die Hard films, then barely simmer for 94 minutes, and…

What you'll be rewarded with here is a technically proficient, impressively-executed-for-an-incredibly-low-budget, film that's touring the festival circuit in 2010-11. A Lonely Place for Dying definitely clears the bar technically (and kudos on achieving that look for only $200k), but just sneaks under the fence creatively, albeit with a few memorable lines and set pieces. Aside from achieving some very nice visual effects, enviable ambiance, and the accompaniment of a very professional and dense musical score (that unfortunately sometimes seems to cover up "important" dialog) at really rock-bottom prices, there's not a lot to see here that you haven't already seen, BUT…with the right backing and a real budget, Robert Rodriguez-style director Justin Eugene Evans clearly demonstrates that he has his technical chops well in order, and he just might pull off a darned good film in the near term if he stays focused and motivated...and uses fresher, home-grown ingredients!

Plusses; some nice cinematography, great acting by Marquand, pretty cool basic plot, nice retro vibe and instagram feel Minusses; Some ham-fisted acting by the actors. Still bearable though. Robert's character is just a bit too soft to believe his back story... He seems better suited to a family feel good movie. Some unnecessary details that aren't developed. The basic crime/fundament is really poorly described and weak as a basis for what it gives rise to. Worth a watch but almost comes across as the 70's gun drama the retro vibe would like to be suggesting, if it weren't for Marquand's strong performance. What more can I say.

I've seen some pretty dumb cheap indie films. You never know where you'll find the gem, something worth watching, something artistic, different. Well, this movie ain't that. I think that the actual equipment, film, lights, makeup, tapes, etc is worth way more than the movie itself. I honestly don't believe that most ratings and comments here are real. This is a horrible attempt to make a film just for the sake of making a film. Just as a guy who sucks at playing a guitar books a gig just so he can say "I'm in a band" or something. Someone made this movie only so he/she could say "I am a movie producer (or a director)..." I rarely leave any reviews, my life is too short for that, but this ***** took away time I'll never get back. the worst thing is the guy who made me see it promised a good laugh. And he was indeed laughing the whole time at technical stuff - visible microphone, bad acting, unintentional camera shaking (as if the camera guy tripped in the middle of the scene), horrible sound, etc. I didn't find it funny, it was sad.

First I couldn't believe the reviews and ratings. Then I checked the people and of course, they have left only one review (for this movie), which makes me think that those reviews are fake. I mean, they gotta be, since no one could take this film seriously, in any way. Directing, plot, acting, editing...so bad. Sound was obviously captured either on a cheap equipment, or by someone who doesn't know how to plug mics properly. I couldn't understand half of dialog. Also there's a loud noise on many places, as if they were making sound louder without eliminating noise afterwards. Editing - OMG where to start. There are PLENTY of dead frames between scenes (1 or 2 frames long, and noticeable for people who know anything about making films). All kinds of transitions, as if someone was checking what FinalCut Pro can do, browsing it's presets and adding stuff. Directing - I think there was no directing. Director probably held camera in his hand saying "now walk" and shooting from the most boring locations possible. I got seriously angry realizing how many great angles he missed. Even if he only followed the director's little black book of angles (which he didn't) it would look much better. Now it looks like when a parent shoots his kid's recital from a single spot in the audience. Extremely frustrating to watch. So I wanted to check the director who tortured me for the whole duration of this film and I discovered that this is the only thing he's done, on his own. Thanks for wasting my time. The only reason I watched the film was it's poster, which reminds me of some Tarantino flick. That is where all the similarity of course, ends. Painful to watch, better be avoid. Don't say I didn't warn you.

Boring, no action, horrible directing (and editing), music is equally bad. Acting was so-so, but it seems like actors behave by instinct and not by script. It's like they were improvising the whole time, guessing lines. Very bad

My 16 yr old recently made a film as a school project. It's some 20 times better than this un-talented waste of time. Well, what to expect from fake "wanna be" directors and writers who can justify their "movie career" only by listing their amateur films here and spending more time writing fake ratings than making more movies (if you google this Justin Eugene Evans, this is his only film in his 30+ yr long "professional career"). The guy actually walks around bragging about some 60 awards he got (!!!) and asking young people if they wanna "star" in his future projects. Not kidding, I did some research, because I was wondering who would make something this cheap and bad. Also, check out these 9 and 10 star ratings - all fakes; Never gave any other ratings and reviews other than this. Sad, pathetic and time-wasting experience. Best to be avoided at any cost.

Not just your regular action movie. There's more behind the guns and fighting than the usual "shoot em up" action flick. The story line is actually well thought out rather than an excuse for more shooting and gore. Great for those looking for action, story twists, chemistry between the main characters, and a story line to bring it all together.

Some great names that I've never heard of before. Ross Marquand and Michael Scovotti were fantastic. Loved their chemistry on screen. Hope to see them in more movies in the future.

The directing was very well done. Truly blown away that this movie was made on a small budget. Great quality and very well written.

Very likely to keep most audiences interested through the whole film.

This whole thing should be packed in a solid 15 min short. Why stretching it so long when there is no substance, or artistic quality to make people go through it all? That was a big mistake. Directing is extremely bad. you're not supposed to pay attention to directing, but this movie makes you pay almost ALL attention to it - in a very frustrating way. I can't explain it, I did not feel comfortable for some reason, being so much "aware" of directing and photography. This movie can't really compete with anything "real". It feels like a home project, or a school project (done by a non talented kid who just wants to get a passing grade). Sorry, I wouldn't give this "project" a pass. My advise - skip.

I don't know how did I get to see it anymore, I remember someone showing me this film, laughing. I paid attention then I started laughing too - I am not a professional film maker, I do some birthdays and parties - but this is the worst video work I've ever seen. The best scene was the ending credits. Avoid if possible. If not, then suffer watching it.

Wow, I don't usually leave reviews, but since I've lost some 30 minutes of my life (that's how long I could handle this), I felt a need to share with the world. This is so bad, I initially thought it's a joke, a parody, etc. Unfortunately it's just a very cheaply done, jokingly bad, bad attempt to make a movie. I felt sorry for those actors, they did a decent job. Even the plot is not that bad, I've seen worse. But the way this is shot, edited, colorized - it's obviously someone's ego trip while proving to himself, the world and his mama that he can make a movie. Good for you.

OK I tried to watch this. I gave it a chance. It just sucks. My 13 yr old does better school project videos. I mean, IMDB has some low standards, when they feature this "film". It's THAT bad. OMG, it's bad.