The Sad Girls of the Mountains

But within 15 minutes in the movies the only emotion that this flick created is that I wanna punch the reporter of the Gonzo Magazine, who is responsible of doing some kinda investigational journalism about the Sad Girls, right in his face. Maybe the makers of the movie wanted to create this with the way the guy acts, the script he got, how he was filmed and portrayed. If that is the case, well done, but then don't please start to wonder when people don't feel like finishing the movie watching an idiot. If wasn't the intention, thern job failed.

From the beginning the movie is edited like a pseudo-documentary, it's not cut fast that I get interested, nervous or shaken (always regarding what kind of emotions a movie might create) and it's not slow with longer picture sequences that leaves room for interpretation or thinking. It's just uninteresting and I can't see if the makers really thought about something like that, or if the just did like it came out. And don't get me wrong, please, I like it when movies have the room to be spontaneous and are not done perfect, when I fell some "indie-flair", if I can see or feel some authenticity in it. Here, this doesn't happen.

So is this a bad movie? I don't know! I just didn't feel it deserved more than the 20 minutes I watched it. I hope other reviews prove that I switched off too early, but I doubt that.