Bloomfield

Not your usual movie, not a blockbuster, not a bad movie either. I'm quite impressed by the quality of the story and the acting. The aunt is really something! I'd recommend it!

I'll keep this to the point, I watch a LOT of horror movies, it's one of my favorite genres, and this movie fails rather spectacularly on almost all fronts. The narration is done entirely with an almost comically overdone southern drawl, scenes will just hang on nothing happening for way too long, most of the actors seem like they're reading their lines for the first time there on set, and no one seems connected to the world around them. Not to mention how noticeable it is when they clearly pulled in random crew members to fill out a scene. The basic idea of the story is also a very generic "small town is secretly a cult", something that can be enjoyable at least, but this is incredibly paint by numbers. It's not even so bad it's funny, it's just frustratingly boring.

I love horror and suspense movies. But lately I haven't seen one where it has kept my attention. This story kept me watching and trying to figure out where it was going with the story. I loved it! Aunt Tilda was creepy but that was the point.....there was something not quite right! The story worked! I read this was the first film directed by this director and she wrote it as well. She also was the main actress! Wow! Can't wait to see where she goes from here!

Elaine is nearly eighteen years old when both her parents are killed in a road accident. She is taken to live with her only relative, an aunt with whom she has had no previous contact. Her new home is Hickville, USA, although it is called a town, it has less than a hundred inhabitants.

"Bloomfield" has been likened to "Rosemary's Baby". Whether or not that is a fair comparison, it is extremely confusing with flashbacks and/or dream sequences. Yes, there is an element of horror to it, but it helps if the plot is relatively easy to follow, if indeed there is a plot. Seriously, this could have been much better, but it fails whichever way you look at it.

As I write this, there are 6 reviews posted for this flick. 5 rate it 8 or above; 1 rates it a 2. That's a pretty big gap and, having seen the movie, I can only guess that the positive reviews are less than objective.

The writer, director, and lead actress on this project is a decent enough actress, and not unpleasant to look at. I can't honestly compliment her directing and writing skills based on this effort.

The remainder of the cast ranged from hammy to amateur. The main antagonist, narrating with a comically overdone stereotype of a southern drawl, kept reminding me of Catherine O'Hara doing Moira Schitt's crow movie, but without Ms. O'Hara's wit or class.

As for the plot, the other honest reviewer here stated that "it took forever for the narrative to go nowhere," and I can't think of a better way to put it. The flick just went on and on, but never progressed. Slow and unoriginally derivative, watching paint dry is more satisfying, and about a suspenseful. Same amount of horror, too.

What is different between this movie and watching paint dry is that the latter doesn't hint at a sequel as this movie did, which was about as horrific as anything to be found here. Just say no.

Move along people; nothing to see here.