Debbie is the host of a paranormal ghost hunter show. But can she come to the rescue when four friends use a Ouija board to summon a 300 year old witch? Good luck, Debbie. You're gonna NEED ... Read allDebbie is the host of a paranormal ghost hunter show. But can she come to the rescue when four friends use a Ouija board to summon a 300 year old witch? Good luck, Debbie. You're gonna NEED it.Debbie is the host of a paranormal ghost hunter show. But can she come to the rescue when four friends use a Ouija board to summon a 300 year old witch? Good luck, Debbie. You're gonna NEED it.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Jessa Jupiter Flux
- Carmilla
- (as Jessa Flux)
Angel Nichole Bradford
- Debbie
- (as Angel Bradford)
Morrigan Thompson-Milam
- Lauren
- (as Morrigan Thompson)
Claude D. Miles
- Claude
- (as Ford Windstar)
Jocephus Brody
- Witchfinder
- (as Jocephus Hudson)
Tony Hack Covington
- Hack
- (as Tony Covington)
Leslie Hancock McCormack
- Lilith
- (as Leslie Hancock)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Terrible, just terrible. The movie ooks like it's been shot on an old VHS tape in the 80s. Acting is undoubtedly the worst I've seen. The main actress has nice boobs and that's it. The 'movie' if I dare call it that, should have lasted 5 minutes and finished after the initial boob flash in my opinion. Even 70s porn movies had a plot and the actors tried to act. This movie fails on EVERY level and should be thrown in the recycle bin (but never be recycled as a movie) Probably cost £50 to make at he most. I didn't have very high expectations but if I could have given a -10 I would have. The people giving this movie more than 1 must have been involved with it's production (and I use the term loosely) Avoid like covid!
Infact brazzers has better camera work and acting. Everything about this film is not good. The iPhone offers better image stabilization then whatever they used here. The acting was completely amateur, you can always tell because good actors don't act. Plus the story was boring and terribly paced, edited by someone who can't be very experienced. I guess the one good point is that it's quite creative with everything being so wacky and weird.
The annoying thing about this film is the last of effort, with the technology and resources we have today anyone can make a film that at least looks good as long as they put in the effort, in this film they clearly didn't.
The annoying thing about this film is the last of effort, with the technology and resources we have today anyone can make a film that at least looks good as long as they put in the effort, in this film they clearly didn't.
This was my introduction into the world of David Farmer, and while it doesn't make me want to watch more of his movies, it certainly founds a place in my b-movie, schlock-loving heart.
The titular Debbie doesn't actually "do" any demons, that's handled by the main antagonist who shows up topless and remains so thru the entire movie. Of course, you'll stop noticing that once the story kicks in and people start being kissed into joining the dark side-- a tactic Darth Vader simply never considered.
I can't in good faith give this movie a rating any higher than a 5, but if IMDb allowed for a secondary "bad movie" rating, this would be a solid 8.
The titular Debbie doesn't actually "do" any demons, that's handled by the main antagonist who shows up topless and remains so thru the entire movie. Of course, you'll stop noticing that once the story kicks in and people start being kissed into joining the dark side-- a tactic Darth Vader simply never considered.
I can't in good faith give this movie a rating any higher than a 5, but if IMDb allowed for a secondary "bad movie" rating, this would be a solid 8.
If someone makes a movie called "Debbie Does Demons," you have to wonder who the movie is actually for. You would attract people that would enjoy watching silly shlock.
However, this movie was done by a few morbidly obese friends who don't know anything about making a film, including editing, how to set up a shot, or even how to focus. You have characters talking off screen, people constantly flubbing their lines, and clunky explanations instead of any exposition. It's just painful to watch.
There is nothing of value here. The main actress gets topless right away and after that there's nothing else to see. (In fact, it's on the disc so you can just toss it into the trash after opening the case up. ) She makes out with a monster prop for a few minutes but there's no effort to make it look like anything other than a toy she just picks up. There's no humor, action, or real story other than "a witch is trying to kill me, here are some scenes."
Watch Birdemic instead.
However, this movie was done by a few morbidly obese friends who don't know anything about making a film, including editing, how to set up a shot, or even how to focus. You have characters talking off screen, people constantly flubbing their lines, and clunky explanations instead of any exposition. It's just painful to watch.
There is nothing of value here. The main actress gets topless right away and after that there's nothing else to see. (In fact, it's on the disc so you can just toss it into the trash after opening the case up. ) She makes out with a monster prop for a few minutes but there's no effort to make it look like anything other than a toy she just picks up. There's no humor, action, or real story other than "a witch is trying to kill me, here are some scenes."
Watch Birdemic instead.
The cover art poster of this film is nice looking and one of the better things about this movie. Didn't have high expectations given the overall rating and its cast. Jessa Flux has appeared in several other lower budget films within the last few years showing skin in about each film and is the only noticeable actress. The other "actors" simply don't seem like actual actors.
Many problems with this film mainly its story and overall cheap looking quality. Besides the subpar acting, the camera work isn't great and the sound varies. The story just isn't interesting and mostly drags. It's supposed to be a horror but comes off as silly. Nothing more to add to this film which hasn't already been said. It's more of a fanfare vanity project than an actual movie.
Many problems with this film mainly its story and overall cheap looking quality. Besides the subpar acting, the camera work isn't great and the sound varies. The story just isn't interesting and mostly drags. It's supposed to be a horror but comes off as silly. Nothing more to add to this film which hasn't already been said. It's more of a fanfare vanity project than an actual movie.
Did you know
- TriviaCarmilla Karnstein is a character featured in Hammer Films "Karnstein Trilogy" of vampire films, including The Vampire Lovers (1970)
- ConnectionsFeatured in Best of the Worst: Donald Farmer's Market (2024)
- How long is Debbie Does Demons?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 14m(74 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content