Debbie Does Demons

Infact brazzers has better camera work and acting. Everything about this film is not good. The iPhone offers better image stabilization then whatever they used here. The acting was completely amateur, you can always tell because good actors don't act. Plus the story was boring and terribly paced, edited by someone who can't be very experienced. I guess the one good point is that it's quite creative with everything being so wacky and weird.

The annoying thing about this film is the last of effort, with the technology and resources we have today anyone can make a film that at least looks good as long as they put in the effort, in this film they clearly didn't.

This is a review, for whatever it is.

I don't hate it, didn't enjoy it (except for the low-energy but committed demon-puppet sex scene and a great simple Republican jab) and the recommendation from RedLetterMedia really caught my eye on what really is Donald Farmer's worst movie, if you can believe that.

Has better lighting in places than a lot of other films in the space though, and Jessa Flux is giving it her all quite literally.

The whole TV show angle was annoying and there were too many characters that should have lead to more seduction and/or death scenes that did either in more creative ways. This isn't good.

This was my introduction into the world of David Farmer, and while it doesn't make me want to watch more of his movies, it certainly founds a place in my b-movie, schlock-loving heart.

The titular Debbie doesn't actually "do" any demons, that's handled by the main antagonist who shows up topless and remains so thru the entire movie. Of course, you'll stop noticing that once the story kicks in and people start being kissed into joining the dark side-- a tactic Darth Vader simply never considered.

I can't in good faith give this movie a rating any higher than a 5, but if IMDb allowed for a secondary "bad movie" rating, this would be a solid 8.

If you have missed that you can see boobs and such on the internet then you can find some of that here.

One problem is that the production value is about the same level as 3rd grade kids with a cellphone. Another issue is that the acting, if it can be called that, is far worse than in any porno. The third issue is that nothing make any sense.

The only positive is that you can sometimes chuckle a bit at the silliness like when the witch says that her captive is a virgin. Yea, sure, and I am Marc Antony.

I dunno what this is, but it is certainly not a movie. Not in any conventional sense. I give this a very generous 1/10 since I cannot go lower. By the way, none of the actors in this movie can go very low either since there is way too much in the way of being able to bend.

Terrible, just terrible. The movie ooks like it's been shot on an old VHS tape in the 80s. Acting is undoubtedly the worst I've seen. The main actress has nice boobs and that's it. The 'movie' if I dare call it that, should have lasted 5 minutes and finished after the initial boob flash in my opinion. Even 70s porn movies had a plot and the actors tried to act. This movie fails on EVERY level and should be thrown in the recycle bin (but never be recycled as a movie) Probably cost £50 to make at he most. I didn't have very high expectations but if I could have given a -10 I would have. The people giving this movie more than 1 must have been involved with it's production (and I use the term loosely) Avoid like covid!