In the aftermath of a tragedy at a summer camp, a group of camp counselors find themselves fighting for their lives against a masked killer.In the aftermath of a tragedy at a summer camp, a group of camp counselors find themselves fighting for their lives against a masked killer.In the aftermath of a tragedy at a summer camp, a group of camp counselors find themselves fighting for their lives against a masked killer.
- Awards
- 1 win total
Bishop Ali Stevens
- Deputy Henry
- (as Bishop Stevens)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I know this was not easy to film so I will give it some credit...but it is definitely in my least favorite horror movies.
The Kills were horrible, barely showed them. Almost all of them were off screen.
I don't understand the random tree shots, they were there for no reason.
The acting... dont even get me started... There was barely any character development, and the acting was horrible.. def trying a little too hard.
And now the killer... He was literally Michael Myers and Jason Voorhees inbred little cousin...
My opinion doesnt run the world so yall do ya thing but...idk this is just my opinion.
The Kills were horrible, barely showed them. Almost all of them were off screen.
I don't understand the random tree shots, they were there for no reason.
The acting... dont even get me started... There was barely any character development, and the acting was horrible.. def trying a little too hard.
And now the killer... He was literally Michael Myers and Jason Voorhees inbred little cousin...
My opinion doesnt run the world so yall do ya thing but...idk this is just my opinion.
Taking place at Silverlake camp, it is about to close and be sold for development. The owner says she has had it in the family, and the first year there were a couple of deaths, and each year after there were 'accidents'. So she is selling as the camp isn't viable anymore. One of the camp counselors makes a Jason joke, so is this a homage or a parody movie? Regardless, it would have been greatly improved if all killings took place in the first 10 minutes of the film. The actors seem earnest in their roles, although most seem amateurs, and when face to face with the killer, they immediately decide to make the worst possible decision. Dumb and inept seems an appropriate description. Difficult to care who get killed. The most adult of the group is among the first killed. Very predictable and a waste of time.
I agree with everything previous critiques said. The plot is the biggest failure here, running neck and neck with the visual quality of the film.
I did not understand how "everyone knew who was responsible" when there wasn't any real backstory on the camp yet, other than "accidents" that plagued the camp for years. Which makes no sense, because even in the 70s & 80s, a camp THAT notorious would've been closed down easily.
Add to that the visual quality I mentioned, I don't know what that was about. Is he trying to make the actors look younger with a failed soft focus technique? Is he trying to make it look like a movie from the early 90s (which would've been shot on film and not on video)? If so, color correcting it to look like an older movie and adding noise and a film effect overlay might've gone a lot further and wouldn't have been super expensive.
Instead, we have a movie that looks like the director just discovered this thing called depth of field, and manhandled the technique throughout the feature. Instead of being interesting or helping the movie look old, it only serves to distract.
It's too bad, too, because low budget doesn't guarantee a bad movie. Lack of imagination and poor filming choices sure will, though.
I did not understand how "everyone knew who was responsible" when there wasn't any real backstory on the camp yet, other than "accidents" that plagued the camp for years. Which makes no sense, because even in the 70s & 80s, a camp THAT notorious would've been closed down easily.
Add to that the visual quality I mentioned, I don't know what that was about. Is he trying to make the actors look younger with a failed soft focus technique? Is he trying to make it look like a movie from the early 90s (which would've been shot on film and not on video)? If so, color correcting it to look like an older movie and adding noise and a film effect overlay might've gone a lot further and wouldn't have been super expensive.
Instead, we have a movie that looks like the director just discovered this thing called depth of field, and manhandled the technique throughout the feature. Instead of being interesting or helping the movie look old, it only serves to distract.
It's too bad, too, because low budget doesn't guarantee a bad movie. Lack of imagination and poor filming choices sure will, though.
I would have give a better review if the movie was so out of focus. I'm guessing the people who made this movie must have bought their camera from a yard sale that wasn't in a good condition. Or either the director has bad eye sights and doesn't realized the film is out of focus? Either way, they should have done better than that. However the movie itself was okay, some cheesy kills that isn't possible was there, lol! But overall it was okay and the camera view was bad out of focus so that's really will hit the ratings for sure as I only give 4 stars for it. I don't like to watch a movie that isn't very clear. They need to improve and learn from their mistakes not to use cheap cameras.
This first film by John Isberg, is a good start but had conflictions in providing innovation or something fresh with 80s college teen slasher movies.
Considering its limitations of the story, it offers good night scenes, that are watchable which can be technically difficult to film. The actors deliver evotive reactions to the terror uleashed to them.
PTSD is a theme carried throughout the film, providing and giving some good dialogue. Its "final girl" trope is not strong, but her acting is good. Its chase scenes has suspense, but it lacks the tension provided with 80s slasher.
One interesting aspect that it was shot in rural Illinois's woods, has strong natural landscape locations. It one makes for a good start for Isberg, there is an interesting closing credits, hopefully to make more horror genre paths for this first directorial debut!
Considering its limitations of the story, it offers good night scenes, that are watchable which can be technically difficult to film. The actors deliver evotive reactions to the terror uleashed to them.
PTSD is a theme carried throughout the film, providing and giving some good dialogue. Its "final girl" trope is not strong, but her acting is good. Its chase scenes has suspense, but it lacks the tension provided with 80s slasher.
One interesting aspect that it was shot in rural Illinois's woods, has strong natural landscape locations. It one makes for a good start for Isberg, there is an interesting closing credits, hopefully to make more horror genre paths for this first directorial debut!
Did you know
- TriviaWhile he doesn't appear in the film, Tom Atkins lent his image to the character of "George Krug" featured in a painting by artist Rob Csiki for a brief scene in the film.
- ConnectionsReferences The Lost Boys (1987)
- SoundtracksGet Me Off This Ride
Written by Rob Newhouse
Performed by The Elvis Brothers
1992, Now Dig This
- How long is Final Summer?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Also known as
- Последнее лето
- Filming locations
- Camp Drake, Fairmount, Illinois, USA(Camp Silverlake)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 22 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content