A young couple unable to conceive travels to a doctor's remote facility.A young couple unable to conceive travels to a doctor's remote facility.A young couple unable to conceive travels to a doctor's remote facility.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Certainly a great attempt at using horror and creating a family. Interesting setup!
Some moments of real interesting execution. A fun campy film if you can see it that way.
Some moments of real interesting execution. A fun campy film if you can see it that way.
I only watched this for the male lead who at least tries to act and has many nearly nude scenes. The females have some total nude scenes, and I mention the nudity because this film offers little else. At times it seems to border on an adult film, but it's just a dull and lifeless mess, in which characters only act in the way they act in bad movies. There is no horror or scares to this at all. Poorly filmed, it was obvious some scenes were filmed with a green screen and badly, as the actors were strangely outlined. Not worth anyone's time.
If you watch the trailer before watching the film you can clearly see that this is an ULB (maybe even no-budget) feature. As such you have to grade features like these on a curve. Does it trip up? For sure it does, but it's clear that a majority of the errors are budgetary. Look at their IMDb and you can see this was created by a bunch of first time feature filmmakers and knowing that I've seen A LOT WORSE. I hope these filmmakers get to make more movies.
It's not easy to make a good movie so I feel bad being this brutal but this movie has a lot of problems.
First of all, I was immediately turned off but the opening scene CGI which wasn't great - to put it kindly. The odd thing is there was nothing really like it in the rest of the film. Thank goodness. At least there are some more practical effects that show up closer to the end of the movie that were pretty decent. If you can't do good CGI you should probably just avoid it. (Pro tip from someone who's never made a movie!)
Secondly, the acting could use some work. Some of the performers sound like they are reading their lines from a teleprompter. The male main lead Daniel gave a decent enough performance. Marie was good at being topless... I'll leave it at that.
I liked the concept behind the movie but the plot was only okay. I could basically guess what's going to happen most of the time, so I feel like they needed to add something more unexpected for the story to remain interesting.
There's a few decent bits of cinema photography but other times it looks a bit like cheap video. Perhaps it needed some atmospheric lighting? I don't know.
In the end it's more of a background movie to watch while you doom scroll on Twitter or watch cat videos on Tik Tok.
First of all, I was immediately turned off but the opening scene CGI which wasn't great - to put it kindly. The odd thing is there was nothing really like it in the rest of the film. Thank goodness. At least there are some more practical effects that show up closer to the end of the movie that were pretty decent. If you can't do good CGI you should probably just avoid it. (Pro tip from someone who's never made a movie!)
Secondly, the acting could use some work. Some of the performers sound like they are reading their lines from a teleprompter. The male main lead Daniel gave a decent enough performance. Marie was good at being topless... I'll leave it at that.
I liked the concept behind the movie but the plot was only okay. I could basically guess what's going to happen most of the time, so I feel like they needed to add something more unexpected for the story to remain interesting.
There's a few decent bits of cinema photography but other times it looks a bit like cheap video. Perhaps it needed some atmospheric lighting? I don't know.
In the end it's more of a background movie to watch while you doom scroll on Twitter or watch cat videos on Tik Tok.
This movies reviews are suspect.
All positive reviews are extremely generic, while bad reviews are much more in-depth (and close to what I observed).
This movie is hard to watch; boring and with terrible green screen keying.
Just don't watch this movie if you're not into watching weird people speak in a boring way for two hours while standing out from the background like sore teeth.
I have to add this to match the required length: it seems obvious to me that quite a lot of friends and family of the actors/producers helped it to get as much visibility as possible. Sadly, you cannot turn s#it into gold like this.
All positive reviews are extremely generic, while bad reviews are much more in-depth (and close to what I observed).
This movie is hard to watch; boring and with terrible green screen keying.
Just don't watch this movie if you're not into watching weird people speak in a boring way for two hours while standing out from the background like sore teeth.
I have to add this to match the required length: it seems obvious to me that quite a lot of friends and family of the actors/producers helped it to get as much visibility as possible. Sadly, you cannot turn s#it into gold like this.
Did you know
- TriviaParts of the film were completed using green screen technology.
- How long is The Institute?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Instituut
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 29 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content