Godfather

I don't know why they changed very good original script changed so much and all character depth we seen in original version completely gone, they changed old chirufilm and didn't give good impact ,utterly waste in all side of the movie compared to original version only one character is justified in this film was ,the character played Vivek Oberoi did in original version ...that actor is good 👍👍 . VFX was very poor like cartoonish bomb blast , bike fires missile at a container lorry scene was very illlogical move from the film maker..Personallyy i don't recommend this movie ..sorry chiru sir ,sorry sallu bhai.

Chiranjeevi was once a megastar is now became notorious for destroying the originality of the script. First he destroyed acharya and now this one. Original movie which was shot in Malayalam by Prithviraj Sukumaran was a cult classic has been destroyed by this 67 year old moron. And cringiest acting made by Salman Khan decelarated the movie's pace. Ayya Chiranjeevi garu meeru cinema maanesi intlo koorchunte manchidi, meeku vayassaindhi kaabatti meeku manavallu unte vaalaki katha cheppandi. Adhi vadalesi meeku ee vayasulo cinema pichchi emtandi. Asalu meeru rajakiyalo dookina taruvaatha meeru acting marichipoyaaru.

I have seen Lucifer in Malayalam with subtitles and feel of the movie always connects to the hero's characterisation.

God Father clearly missed this and just focused on adding unnecessary masala elements with unconvincing hero characterisation.

Chiranjeevi sir should stop doing these remakes and should give chance to the young directors the way Kamal Hassan done with Vikram.

Audience taste has been changed and chiranjeevis mindset stuck 10 years back when he joined politics. Please update.

Start giving chances to new director's and stop involving in scripts of the successful directors like koratala shiva.

The story features good content and characters.

However, the screenplay suffers from being excessively slow-paced and lacking excitement.

Both the script and direction fail to match the quality of the original version.

Chiranjeevi is suitable for the role and delivers a commendable performance in many scenes, although some are not handled as effectively.

It would be unfair to compare Chiranjeevi to Mohanlal from the original film.

Sathya Dev also performs well in his role, although not as brilliantly as Vivek Oberoi.

Nayanthara follows her usual pattern of acting, similar to her previous films like "Tulasi," "Viswasam," and "Jayasimha." There's nothing new in her portrayal.

The on-screen pairing of Chiranjeevi and Nayanthara as brother and sister appears odd.

Salman Khan's role feels wasted, or rather, a good role is wasted on Salman.

The background score lifted from Vikram Veda is funny.

The cinematography is well-executed.

Editing seems to focus excessively on slow-motion sequences.

This film is not worth watching in theaters. It would be better to wait for its release on an OTT platform, especially if you haven't seen the original "Lucifer."

This is a film where the cinematic art dies. "Made for the masses" cannot be an excuse for releasing such a bad piece of work. About a good 30 minutes of the movie is reserved for people walking in slow motion. Ever present, deafening background music, two ugly songs, lack of a solid storyline make the film unbearable. Horrible lyrics and dance in the two songs! At times, the fact that the director saw the preview of the shots and said okay for certain takes to be included in the cut, surprises me.

Messiah like unrealistic depiction of the lead is mostly to pander the fan base and get whistles in the the theatres.

Sorry, we can't settle with this film being a hit or anything close to it.

I recommend skipping this for good.