IMDb RATING
6.7/10
2.3K
YOUR RATING
A woman one day simply walks out on her family. Or does she?A woman one day simply walks out on her family. Or does she?A woman one day simply walks out on her family. Or does she?
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 4 nominations total
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Clarisse (Vicky Krieps) leaves his seemingly nice close family. Dysfunction within the family is slowly revealed. Some seems to be memories, some an alternate world, and some surreal. The reality is eventually revealed.
This is directed by Mathieu Amalric who I know more as a great character actor. I was a bit confused with the first half. The movie kept slipping away as the confused plot kept piling on the tangential arcs. In some ways, the visuals need to be more surreal. There are ways for Clarisse to show some more clarity especially during her moments. Of course, it all comes together with the older girl pianist. It's a nice a-ha moment. It's a very devastating reveal.
This is directed by Mathieu Amalric who I know more as a great character actor. I was a bit confused with the first half. The movie kept slipping away as the confused plot kept piling on the tangential arcs. In some ways, the visuals need to be more surreal. There are ways for Clarisse to show some more clarity especially during her moments. Of course, it all comes together with the older girl pianist. It's a nice a-ha moment. It's a very devastating reveal.
When viewing a film that's presented as a puzzle, one certainly hopes that everything will make sense at the end. Of course, if that result is to be at all satisfactory, the narrative for getting viewers to that conclusion needs to be equally engaging. Unfortunately, that's where writer-director Mathieu Amalric's latest offering loses its way. While the story of a wife and mother (Vicky Krieps) desperate to leave her family starts out strong (especially since her reasons for doing so are far from clear), audiences are likely to think that they're in store for a compelling ride, a mystery that's going to deliciously reveal itself as the story plays out. However, after this noteworthy beginning, the picture spins its yarn in a highly fractured way, mixing a variety of images that appear to draw from current activity, flashbacks and envisioned futures (some even of a fantasy nature), all thrown together in a somewhat haphazard fashion that constitutes more muddle than riddle. One can readily assume that this jumble of imagery is indicative of what's going on in the protagonist's mind, but that's not always clear nor is the cause for it. Thankfully, the filmmaker manages to tie up all of the various strands by picture's end, but it asks viewers to go back and reassemble the pieces that lead its conclusion, and, frankly, that seems like an awful lot of work to go through after a protracted stretch of film where it's easy for audience members to lose interest. To its credit, this release provides an excellent showcase for Krieps, backed by gorgeous cinematography and a superb classical music score, as well as its fine opening sequence. But these strengths aren't enough to compensate for the shortcomings and an overall approach that often seems contrived and certainly sacrifices substance for style. This is the kind of picture that will definitely appeal to the arthouse crowd, but average moviegoers are likely to find it pretentious, self-important and needlessly cryptic, qualities that detract from what could have been more involving had the filmmakers kept matters simpler and less enigmatic.
I don't write reviews at all but in this case I wanted to share my experience. I watched this movie twice and I think it's extremely hard to catch everything in first round. And partially that's the beauty of this movie. Second round closed the circle for me. There's so many nimble moments I missed and revealed.
It is one of the most underrated movies I ve seen.
I understand that sometimes it's hard to find time to watch a movie let alone twice. I found it so rewarding in this case.
Im wondering how many people really understood this movie.
Beautiful, sad, hard, Life. Masterpiece.
9,5 / 10.
It is one of the most underrated movies I ve seen.
I understand that sometimes it's hard to find time to watch a movie let alone twice. I found it so rewarding in this case.
Im wondering how many people really understood this movie.
Beautiful, sad, hard, Life. Masterpiece.
9,5 / 10.
Matthieu Amalric's fine French film HOLD ME TIGHT begins with a woman leaving her husband and two kids (a boy and a girl) and driving away while they sleep. Or, so it seems.
Clarisse (Vicky Krieps) does leave her husband Marc (Arieh Worthalter) and children (played by four different actors at various points). But, was it this morning? Yesterday? Tomorrow? Or, ever? Amalric's screenplay adaptation of Claudine Galea's play, immediately makes it clear that little of what we see can be taken either linearly or even, literally.
Clarisse reveals herself slowly, but it's all purposely fragmented: She travels to a resort in the mountains. Visits a friend at a coffee shop. Takes on a part-time job. Flirts with men. All the while, she imagines what is happening to her family back home. Do they miss her? Are they angry with her decision? Better off without her? Amalric is constantly challenging the viewer. At various points, Clarisse seems to be almost telepathically communicating with her husband and children, even physically moving through their lives like a form of ghost.
Amalric's deft handling of difficult material shows a strong director's sense, Best known in the U. S. for his acting in QUANTUM OF SOLACE, GRAND BUDAPEST HOTEL and DIVING BELL AND THE BUTTERFLY, Almaric has now directed a half-dozen features and his experience on both sides of the camera are on clear display here. Amalric is abetted by the exceptional Krieps (PHANTOM THREAD, BERGMAN ISLAND) in the leading role. Krieps has a natural presence where she can appear to be both accessible and mysterious at the same time - open, yet never truly revealing. It's those very qualities which make the movie so intriguing no matter how inscrutable it may seem at times.
At a couple of key moments, we see Clarisse fumbling over a stack of old Polaroids. Are they her experiences? Her memories? Or, apparitions? After all, what are ghosts but memories? Moments in time to hold on to. And cherished in the moment.
Clarisse (Vicky Krieps) does leave her husband Marc (Arieh Worthalter) and children (played by four different actors at various points). But, was it this morning? Yesterday? Tomorrow? Or, ever? Amalric's screenplay adaptation of Claudine Galea's play, immediately makes it clear that little of what we see can be taken either linearly or even, literally.
Clarisse reveals herself slowly, but it's all purposely fragmented: She travels to a resort in the mountains. Visits a friend at a coffee shop. Takes on a part-time job. Flirts with men. All the while, she imagines what is happening to her family back home. Do they miss her? Are they angry with her decision? Better off without her? Amalric is constantly challenging the viewer. At various points, Clarisse seems to be almost telepathically communicating with her husband and children, even physically moving through their lives like a form of ghost.
Amalric's deft handling of difficult material shows a strong director's sense, Best known in the U. S. for his acting in QUANTUM OF SOLACE, GRAND BUDAPEST HOTEL and DIVING BELL AND THE BUTTERFLY, Almaric has now directed a half-dozen features and his experience on both sides of the camera are on clear display here. Amalric is abetted by the exceptional Krieps (PHANTOM THREAD, BERGMAN ISLAND) in the leading role. Krieps has a natural presence where she can appear to be both accessible and mysterious at the same time - open, yet never truly revealing. It's those very qualities which make the movie so intriguing no matter how inscrutable it may seem at times.
At a couple of key moments, we see Clarisse fumbling over a stack of old Polaroids. Are they her experiences? Her memories? Or, apparitions? After all, what are ghosts but memories? Moments in time to hold on to. And cherished in the moment.
This movie is great: it gathers a lot of intensity and power that go through the spectator. Mathieu Amalric in the directing did an extraordinaire work: the plot, the shots, the editing...real great stuff.
He created a movie that deserves a lot of credit. It's common to find a film that has a great story and an ambitious use of the skills to tell the story itself.
Don't miss it!
He created a movie that deserves a lot of credit. It's common to find a film that has a great story and an ambitious use of the skills to tell the story itself.
Don't miss it!
Did you know
- TriviaThe film director Mathieu Amalric explained the origin of the title and why it is written without an hyphen. It initially came from the song "La nage indienne" by Etienne Daho, which contains "Serre-moi fort. Si ton corps se fait plus léger, nous pourrons nous sauver" (with an hyphen, according to the French spelling rules) and was rewritten to become "Serre moins fort. Si ton coeur se fait plus léger, je pourrai me sauver" (without an hyphen, according to the French spelling rules). Mixing both versions, this gave a temporary title "Serre moi(ns) fort". Finally, the title was changed back to the first version, but with the hyphen still dropped: "Serre moi fort", with the 3 words "isolated" from each other.
- ConnectionsReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 876: Avatar: The Way of Water (2022)
- How long is Hold Me Tight?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Languages
- Also known as
- Sımsıkı Sarıl Bana
- Filming locations
- Ganties, Haute-Garonne, France(family house and town)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $74,723
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $14,242
- Sep 11, 2022
- Gross worldwide
- $926,967
- Runtime1 hour 37 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content