IMDb RATING
6.5/10
9.9K
YOUR RATING
Bull mysteriously returns home after a 10 year absence to seek revenge on those who double crossed him all those years ago.Bull mysteriously returns home after a 10 year absence to seek revenge on those who double crossed him all those years ago.Bull mysteriously returns home after a 10 year absence to seek revenge on those who double crossed him all those years ago.
Lois Tallulah
- Gemma
- (as Lois Brabin-Platt)
Rufus Gerhardt-Williams
- Adam
- (as Rufus Williams-Gerhardt)
Andrew Rattenbury
- Abattoir Manager
- (as Andy Rattenbury)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Saw this at the London Film Festival premiere last night. It's a well-made and engaging low-budget crime film, with excellent acting and music. Neil Maskell and David Hayman give dependably good performances. It's very much along the lines of Dead Man's Shoes and Kill List, although lacking the flair, originality and imagination of those classics. Hard geezer seeks revenge, with over-the-top violence and nasty, humourless working-class gangsters. A grim and dour tone. Some nicely choreographed stabbings and gunshots. It's nothing new, but it does it satisfactorily and holds your attention.
It's a great shame then that the film is almost fatally marred by a bizarre and poorly thought-through conclusion that had to make me wonder why not a single person on the team of this production said 'um, hang on a minute, are we really going with this ending..?'.
It's just wrong for the tone of the film.
I can see what they were aiming for, as it's been done before in one of the best crime films ever made, but here they mess it up by not setting it up correctly, and in the process almost wreck a perfectly workable film.
All in all, despite this flaw, this is worth a watch, as it is undeniably entertaining.
It's a great shame then that the film is almost fatally marred by a bizarre and poorly thought-through conclusion that had to make me wonder why not a single person on the team of this production said 'um, hang on a minute, are we really going with this ending..?'.
It's just wrong for the tone of the film.
I can see what they were aiming for, as it's been done before in one of the best crime films ever made, but here they mess it up by not setting it up correctly, and in the process almost wreck a perfectly workable film.
All in all, despite this flaw, this is worth a watch, as it is undeniably entertaining.
Intense thriller, the story slowly unravels, in a violent way, unsympathetic characters that keep you on the tip of the chair nonetheless, with un unexpected ending.
A well made revenge thriller, with particularly gruesome and graphic retribution acts. I'm not really into it with this level of nastiness. If you want a good feeling in you after a viewing, don't see this.
Though by the end, the aforementioned excessive nastiness can be explained by a story revelation, there's still not much gain from this given the negative prestige we feel for the main character.
The film-craft is in top form here with a high level of art attributed to the script, direction, acting and sound. Unfortunately the main character is an awful person, even before he went evil. It's not easy to sympathise with the guy, for his gruesome acts and short flashback segments which don't display his humane side for long enough. Not possible to get close enough to him.
Though by the end, the aforementioned excessive nastiness can be explained by a story revelation, there's still not much gain from this given the negative prestige we feel for the main character.
The film-craft is in top form here with a high level of art attributed to the script, direction, acting and sound. Unfortunately the main character is an awful person, even before he went evil. It's not easy to sympathise with the guy, for his gruesome acts and short flashback segments which don't display his humane side for long enough. Not possible to get close enough to him.
Anyone into simple , easy to follow revenge thrillers will enjoy this one. Its a low budget , pretty violent film with a nice twist at the very end. I thought the guy who played Bull did a great job as the main character. The only actor i recognized was David Hayman who plays Norm. There was no sympathy for those getting whacked. Its British so if you can see with subs its best. Overall a fun revenge thriller . Recommend.
This was a masterfully produced film, maybe largely because the actors are all excellent. I'm not sure how it should've ended, but I think this particular one was a strange choice and, while it was fun because it was unexpected, it didn't fit the rest of the story- at least, not without some sort of evolution. The movie starts with a mad dad and we understand his motivation: he's a gangster out for revenge, and he wants to find his estranged son. Why switch genres at the bitter end? Was that just the cheap trick it felt like?
Did you know
- TriviaThe movie was made for £500,000 and shot over 18 days. According to director Paul Andrew Williams in Empire magazine June 2022.
- How long is Bull?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Бычара
- Filming locations
- Temple Hill, Dartford, Kent, England, UK(housing estate, Gemma's house, Dave's flat)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $17,716
- Runtime
- 1h 28m(88 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content