IMDb RATING
4.3/10
6.6K
YOUR RATING
A young woman unleashes terrifying demons when supernatural forces at the root of a decades-old rift between mother and daughter are ruthlessly revealed.A young woman unleashes terrifying demons when supernatural forces at the root of a decades-old rift between mother and daughter are ruthlessly revealed.A young woman unleashes terrifying demons when supernatural forces at the root of a decades-old rift between mother and daughter are ruthlessly revealed.
- Awards
- 2 nominations total
Michael J Rogers
- Michael
- (as Michael J. Rogers)
Christopher Wardrop
- Detective
- (as Chris Froese)
Andrea Agur
- Cashier
- (uncredited)
Nelson Conway
- Venatores soldier
- (uncredited)
Emma Jonnz
- Dominique
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
You'll know it's bad when they enter a VR world in someone's mind. Monster wasn't very scary. Poor Neil, guy needs a hit and this ain't it.
I like Neil's films and unique takes on existing genres. However this movie was much more bland then the trailers make you believe. Literally every cool idea and scene was shown in the trailer. Wanna see how black-op military priests sent by the vatican combat demons...... yeah that never happens. Could have been cool, but nah, no budget for that! Of the 3 V. R. scenes there was only one interesting moment when they kinda reveal the demon. This movie had lots of promise but went nowhere with it, was not scary enough to be called horror, and inspite of its one or two unique ideas, it did not push them far enough.
Oh dear me , was interested in this film because I'm a big fan of blomkamps other work but this is so dull and boring , the effects are pretty poor as well , ok gutted someone who brought us district 9 and elisium has fallen so far from grace , his oats studio work was better than this , a film from the short rakka could of been great , this film is not scary nor sci fi it's just stupid
and boring .
Beneath the glossy surface of unique visual ambition and a slew of intriguing, potential-filled ideas and concepts, this is unfortunately just 100 minutes of more of the same nonsensical writing, weak characters, and unbearably stupid dialogue and clichés that have plagued the horror genre for decades.
How is this the same filmmaker behind District 9?
How is this the same filmmaker behind District 9?
Please excuse my attempts at humor. It's a defensive reaction.
I really, really wanted to like this film. It has been on my watchlist for like 3 years, and I was constantly checking on it. I hoped for Wan as a director, but when I saw Blomkamp, I was pleasantly surprised. I wouldn't say I liked Elysium, but I think Neill is a talented director.
With that being said, I give this film a lot of credit and a 6/10. It had its moments, but the negatives overcame the positives. As more people will watch it, I think it will drop down to ~5.5 or less.
There were three major problems for me:
1) the dialogue was unbearable most of the time;
2) the amounts of exposition thrown in these were overwhelming. The story comes to a halt for 10-15 minutes, and then BOOM, you get bombarded with information the characters share (the things they already know btw). And it's not that confusing to provide this much flashback.
3) the whole technology/occult combination was fresh, but when they tell you the point of all that, it just becomes a laughable excuse and an insane over-complication of what could have been done.
Throw in some heavy continuity, and the majority of the viewers will probably dislike this. The ending clearly shows that at least 10-15 minutes of it was missing, the main lead teleports way too much, and some scenes end abruptly.
I want to mention some positives as well, the film did look good, and I enjoyed the ending night scenes. I constantly felt like I'm giving this film much more creditworthiness than it's worth, but I saw some potential in it.
And yeah, while interesting in their looks, the simulation scenes lacked creativity, and the entity of which we got no information looks like Radament from Diablo 2.
Overall, this is not a horror film. And as much as I appreciate the effort, I didn't like it as much as I wanted to.
I really, really wanted to like this film. It has been on my watchlist for like 3 years, and I was constantly checking on it. I hoped for Wan as a director, but when I saw Blomkamp, I was pleasantly surprised. I wouldn't say I liked Elysium, but I think Neill is a talented director.
With that being said, I give this film a lot of credit and a 6/10. It had its moments, but the negatives overcame the positives. As more people will watch it, I think it will drop down to ~5.5 or less.
There were three major problems for me:
1) the dialogue was unbearable most of the time;
2) the amounts of exposition thrown in these were overwhelming. The story comes to a halt for 10-15 minutes, and then BOOM, you get bombarded with information the characters share (the things they already know btw). And it's not that confusing to provide this much flashback.
3) the whole technology/occult combination was fresh, but when they tell you the point of all that, it just becomes a laughable excuse and an insane over-complication of what could have been done.
Throw in some heavy continuity, and the majority of the viewers will probably dislike this. The ending clearly shows that at least 10-15 minutes of it was missing, the main lead teleports way too much, and some scenes end abruptly.
I want to mention some positives as well, the film did look good, and I enjoyed the ending night scenes. I constantly felt like I'm giving this film much more creditworthiness than it's worth, but I saw some potential in it.
And yeah, while interesting in their looks, the simulation scenes lacked creativity, and the entity of which we got no information looks like Radament from Diablo 2.
Overall, this is not a horror film. And as much as I appreciate the effort, I didn't like it as much as I wanted to.
Did you know
- TriviaFilmed secretly in Canada over the course of the Covid-19 pandemic.
- GoofsWhen Carly is shown back home after the first interlink with her Mother she is in the kitchen with her back to the kitchen bench. You then hear the kettle whistling to tell you it's at its boil. Only when Carly turns round you see that the kettle is electric. To have a whistling kettle it would have to be on a gas stove. Edit: There are electric kettles that do whistle. You've just never seen one until now. Furthermore; It does not matter if a kettle is on a gas or electric stove. The water boiling is what produces the whistle. Not what causes the water to boil.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Half in the Bag: Demonic (2021)
- SoundtracksPiano Sonata No. 14 in C sharp minor, Op. 27 No. 2 'Moonlight' I. Adagio sostenuto
Composed by Ludwig van Beethoven
Published by Flipper srl APM (ASCAP)
Appears courtesy of APM Production Music
- How long is Demonic?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $71,334
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $40,683
- Aug 22, 2021
- Gross worldwide
- $366,656
- Runtime
- 1h 44m(104 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.00 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content