From Black
- 2023
- 1h 40m
IMDb RATING
5.0/10
2.5K
YOUR RATING
A guilt-ridden mother gets an offer to uncover her missing son's fate, but at a disturbing cost. Her decision on how far she'll go for redemption drives the story.A guilt-ridden mother gets an offer to uncover her missing son's fate, but at a disturbing cost. Her decision on how far she'll go for redemption drives the story.A guilt-ridden mother gets an offer to uncover her missing son's fate, but at a disturbing cost. Her decision on how far she'll go for redemption drives the story.
- Awards
- 1 win total
Eduardo Campirano
- Noah
- (as Eduardo Campirano III)
Alicia S Mason
- Simmons
- (as Alicia Mason)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
How far would you be willing to go if you lost a child, and had a chance to bring them back?
This is what one, young, heroine-addicted mother is forced to confront in the new film From Black.
Because, after she loses her son- partially as a result of her own neglect- she's gets such a chance.
When she meets a mysterious man, who teaches her about an ancient mystical ritual, through which she can barter for the return of someone she has lost.
This man claims he learned about the ritual, after losing his own daughter.
And walks her through the steps, required to initiate an agreement, with a dark, occult force...who promises to bring her son back from the dead, once all the steps of the ritual have been carefully followed.
That is, unless, he's just a conman, who has set out to entrap her in a snare, designed to free himself from a deal he could not renege on.
Either way...it unleashes a demon, from which she cannot escape.
Inevitably landing her in jail.
Under the watchful eye of her sister, who works as a detective, that is trying to understand what, exactly, her sister has been going through...and why.
In a desperate attempt to help her.
The story is told to us told through a series of flashbacks, as our protaganess explains the situation to her detective sister.
Though, unsurprisingly, she doesn't believe her.
Until she is forced to confront her doubt, face on.
The flashbacks are broken up into the different stages of the ritual, as she went through them, on the path to achieve her goal.
Giving the whole story an air of mystery.
Of course, it cannot be ignored that this is a bigger budget, high concept, ripoff of the 2016 film A Dark Song.
I noticed a couple other reviewers commenting on the similarities between the two films.
So I went and watched it for myself.
And concur.
Arguably, they did make a few improvements...and completely changed the ending (having completely removed her redemption), in the process.
But, by doing so, they also dumbed it down, as a result of removing all the references to esotericism (Kabballah, Gnosticism); the psychedelic aspect; and character development of the guy running the ritual.
Some changes also took the forms of tweaks.
Like how they made the main character an opiate addict, instead of an alcoholic; and removed the sexually abusively, toxic, nature of the occult dude (who is actually the heroine addict in A Dark Song)- having transferred those qualities into the character of her former boyfriend.
But she's still trying to get her kid back.
The sister still plays a supporting, yet critical, role (albeit, not one central to the plot, like we have here).
And, like someone already mentioned...they even copy the jerky violin music straight from the original soundtrack.
But, while this film is wholly unoriginal...it's just different enough to not be a total write off.
Because, for one, they do improve upon the special effects.
Albeit, with CGI.
The monster has a very Del Toro vibe to it (think, Pan's Labyrinth).
Which, although, it is rendered with CGI (something I would normally hate)...it's actually not done too horribly...and doesn't come off as out of place in the film.
And, they also fashion a more clear introduction (removing the ambiguity from the opening of the original).
With Anna Camp doing a great job in the leading role.
Her torment feels genuine.
So the problem, here, is not that the film is not entertaining.
Because it is definitely entertaining enough to hold your attention.
It's just so hard to overcome how horribly they rip off the other film (which is a low budget feature, no less).
Unless you consider this a remake.
Because the plot is almost entirely the same.
Only, with the disturbing, psychological, torture, she is forced to endure, revamped.
You shouldn't be able to take someone else's original idea, dumb it down, and make a bigger budget, high concept version of it.
Without repercussions, at least.
Though, it's not inherently clear whether they purchased the rights to do so, or not.
Either way, it comes off as bad form (not to mention low class).
Although, by removing the redemptive aspect present in the original...they do make it a somewhat different film.
Transforming it into more of a true horror, as opposed to a psychological thriller.
You can tell they were trying to make it less drawn out, and remove the ambiguity, for more mainstream audiences.
But it's still far too close to the former film for comfort.
Especially if they DO straight up rip it off.
But watch them both, and judge for yourself.
See what you think.
4.5 out of 10.
This is what one, young, heroine-addicted mother is forced to confront in the new film From Black.
Because, after she loses her son- partially as a result of her own neglect- she's gets such a chance.
When she meets a mysterious man, who teaches her about an ancient mystical ritual, through which she can barter for the return of someone she has lost.
This man claims he learned about the ritual, after losing his own daughter.
And walks her through the steps, required to initiate an agreement, with a dark, occult force...who promises to bring her son back from the dead, once all the steps of the ritual have been carefully followed.
That is, unless, he's just a conman, who has set out to entrap her in a snare, designed to free himself from a deal he could not renege on.
Either way...it unleashes a demon, from which she cannot escape.
Inevitably landing her in jail.
Under the watchful eye of her sister, who works as a detective, that is trying to understand what, exactly, her sister has been going through...and why.
In a desperate attempt to help her.
The story is told to us told through a series of flashbacks, as our protaganess explains the situation to her detective sister.
Though, unsurprisingly, she doesn't believe her.
Until she is forced to confront her doubt, face on.
The flashbacks are broken up into the different stages of the ritual, as she went through them, on the path to achieve her goal.
Giving the whole story an air of mystery.
Of course, it cannot be ignored that this is a bigger budget, high concept, ripoff of the 2016 film A Dark Song.
I noticed a couple other reviewers commenting on the similarities between the two films.
So I went and watched it for myself.
And concur.
Arguably, they did make a few improvements...and completely changed the ending (having completely removed her redemption), in the process.
But, by doing so, they also dumbed it down, as a result of removing all the references to esotericism (Kabballah, Gnosticism); the psychedelic aspect; and character development of the guy running the ritual.
Some changes also took the forms of tweaks.
Like how they made the main character an opiate addict, instead of an alcoholic; and removed the sexually abusively, toxic, nature of the occult dude (who is actually the heroine addict in A Dark Song)- having transferred those qualities into the character of her former boyfriend.
But she's still trying to get her kid back.
The sister still plays a supporting, yet critical, role (albeit, not one central to the plot, like we have here).
And, like someone already mentioned...they even copy the jerky violin music straight from the original soundtrack.
But, while this film is wholly unoriginal...it's just different enough to not be a total write off.
Because, for one, they do improve upon the special effects.
Albeit, with CGI.
The monster has a very Del Toro vibe to it (think, Pan's Labyrinth).
Which, although, it is rendered with CGI (something I would normally hate)...it's actually not done too horribly...and doesn't come off as out of place in the film.
And, they also fashion a more clear introduction (removing the ambiguity from the opening of the original).
With Anna Camp doing a great job in the leading role.
Her torment feels genuine.
So the problem, here, is not that the film is not entertaining.
Because it is definitely entertaining enough to hold your attention.
It's just so hard to overcome how horribly they rip off the other film (which is a low budget feature, no less).
Unless you consider this a remake.
Because the plot is almost entirely the same.
Only, with the disturbing, psychological, torture, she is forced to endure, revamped.
You shouldn't be able to take someone else's original idea, dumb it down, and make a bigger budget, high concept version of it.
Without repercussions, at least.
Though, it's not inherently clear whether they purchased the rights to do so, or not.
Either way, it comes off as bad form (not to mention low class).
Although, by removing the redemptive aspect present in the original...they do make it a somewhat different film.
Transforming it into more of a true horror, as opposed to a psychological thriller.
You can tell they were trying to make it less drawn out, and remove the ambiguity, for more mainstream audiences.
But it's still far too close to the former film for comfort.
Especially if they DO straight up rip it off.
But watch them both, and judge for yourself.
See what you think.
4.5 out of 10.
I was intrigued into watching this one by seeing the trailer for movie first. I am a seasoned horror fan. I have been watching horror films made from the 1920's till the present. I also watch foreign language horror films.
Occultism has taken a recent trend into mainstream and independent horror movies. I don't know what the agenda is, but films of this sort get me disturbed. Especially if the younger generation of moviegoers are watching these types of films.
This movie is about a drug-addicted mother who loses her young son while in a stupor. When she wakes up, her son is gone. Try as she might her son is never found.
Years later while in a group of similar people who are discussing their problems, a man approaches her and tells her that he knows a ritual that will bring her son back.
Desperate to get her son back at any cost the woman yields to all the man's terms. Watch the movie to see what happens next...
Verdict: the movie is not all that bad for a one-time viewing. The film held my attention through-out which is rare. The acting, photography, background-music and direction is professional. The special-effects though very meager are inspired from Clive Barker's Hellraiser. I loved the special effects however short they were in the film. This is the only plus point of the movie.
Movies like these definitely spawn a sequel and I won't be surprised if this one does. Shall I recommend another film similar to this? It's called Pumpkinhead(1988) directed by the legendary special-effects wizard Stan Winston(Predator, The Terminator, Aliens) and stars the legendary actor Lance Henriksen(Hard Target, The Nature Of The Beast, Johnny Handsome, Millennium TV Series).
Occultism has taken a recent trend into mainstream and independent horror movies. I don't know what the agenda is, but films of this sort get me disturbed. Especially if the younger generation of moviegoers are watching these types of films.
This movie is about a drug-addicted mother who loses her young son while in a stupor. When she wakes up, her son is gone. Try as she might her son is never found.
Years later while in a group of similar people who are discussing their problems, a man approaches her and tells her that he knows a ritual that will bring her son back.
Desperate to get her son back at any cost the woman yields to all the man's terms. Watch the movie to see what happens next...
Verdict: the movie is not all that bad for a one-time viewing. The film held my attention through-out which is rare. The acting, photography, background-music and direction is professional. The special-effects though very meager are inspired from Clive Barker's Hellraiser. I loved the special effects however short they were in the film. This is the only plus point of the movie.
Movies like these definitely spawn a sequel and I won't be surprised if this one does. Shall I recommend another film similar to this? It's called Pumpkinhead(1988) directed by the legendary special-effects wizard Stan Winston(Predator, The Terminator, Aliens) and stars the legendary actor Lance Henriksen(Hard Target, The Nature Of The Beast, Johnny Handsome, Millennium TV Series).
Fairly cliched plot. Grieving parent, wanting to bring child back. Obviously things go wrong.
Actors did good. Detailed scenes featuring the ritual creates good intrigue. But that's all there is in the movie. A lot of build up, but it doesn't go anywhere. No real scares, pretty disappointing on the horror front. (The ritual reminded me a little bit of Fullmetal Alchemist.)
The movie also starts in the present and goes back and forth, with the main character telling us the story, but that didn't really serve any real purpose, I'm fairly certain the movie would've played out better if it was linear. The movie is primarily in the past, a flashback, and cutting back for very brief moments to the present didn't add anything to the plot.
Overall, some good moments in the beginning, but ends in disappointment. 4/10.
Actors did good. Detailed scenes featuring the ritual creates good intrigue. But that's all there is in the movie. A lot of build up, but it doesn't go anywhere. No real scares, pretty disappointing on the horror front. (The ritual reminded me a little bit of Fullmetal Alchemist.)
The movie also starts in the present and goes back and forth, with the main character telling us the story, but that didn't really serve any real purpose, I'm fairly certain the movie would've played out better if it was linear. The movie is primarily in the past, a flashback, and cutting back for very brief moments to the present didn't add anything to the plot.
Overall, some good moments in the beginning, but ends in disappointment. 4/10.
An extremely disappointing effort that has no new ideas and takes no chances. As I say in the title, it does what Bird Box did with A Quiet Place....it takes an engaging and interesting story and strips away all that made the original film (A Dark Song...which its obviously trying to rip-off) memorable. Just a really lazy effort here. Its not juat that the movie is slow (it is), but that the movie never bothers to build tension or give you are reason to care about anyone or anything in it. As others have pointed out, the main character is so stupid and selfish, you find yourself openly rooting for her to fail and be punished. One can tell that any positive reviewers are casuals and probably haven't seen many horror movies.
From Black (2023) is a movie that was released on Shudder last week. The storyline follows a woman who became a drug addict after her son mysteriously disappeared. As she is released from the clinic and begins adjusting to society she is approached by an individual who offers to tell her what happened to her son that day, but at what cost?
This movie is directed by Thomas Marchese (Fallen) and stars Anna Camp (Pitch Perfect), John Ales (Euphoria), Jennifer Lafleur (Nope) and Travis Hammer (Godless)
This is another one of those movies where nothing happens for over an hour into the movie. The storyline, acting and dialogue were all mediocre to bad. There's some scenes that were not needed at all (the baby daddy scene). I will say the first action scene was really good. The mask, makeup and costume of the villain was solid. As the movie progresses and the main character evolves, this ends up concluding better than it starts.
Overall, this is a very average addition to the horror genre with nothing new. I would score this a 3.5/10 and only recommend it to diehard horror enthusiasts.
This movie is directed by Thomas Marchese (Fallen) and stars Anna Camp (Pitch Perfect), John Ales (Euphoria), Jennifer Lafleur (Nope) and Travis Hammer (Godless)
This is another one of those movies where nothing happens for over an hour into the movie. The storyline, acting and dialogue were all mediocre to bad. There's some scenes that were not needed at all (the baby daddy scene). I will say the first action scene was really good. The mask, makeup and costume of the villain was solid. As the movie progresses and the main character evolves, this ends up concluding better than it starts.
Overall, this is a very average addition to the horror genre with nothing new. I would score this a 3.5/10 and only recommend it to diehard horror enthusiasts.
Did you know
- TriviaThe quote from the start of the movie is was originally from the Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith (2005) novelization. The full quote reads: "The dark is generous and it is patient and it always wins - but in the heart of its strength lies its weakness: one lone candle is enough to hold it back. Love is more than a candle. Love can ignite the stars."
- How long is From Black?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $383,784
- Runtime
- 1h 40m(100 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content