American Dreamer

Very bad and not entertaining to watch and kinda boring to be honest, the cast is great but its just not an interesting premise and the lackluster performance don't help to fix this mess, its a very lame movie and im very sad after watching it, its just a mess, there are only scenes after scenes after scenes and there is no connection or nothing interesting happening, Peter i guess he is stuck, he always act the same and he doesn't even try anymore and that's so sad because i love the way, he is the same a Esposito from Breakking Bad, he act always like the character that made him famous overall 5/10.

As a comedy American Dreamer isn't that great, or I must have a totally different sense of humour. Nevertheless it's not a bad movie. It is pleasant to follow, no real dull moments, a bit more dramatic than humorous, and enjoyable actors. Peter Dinklage is well casted for this role, an always dissatisfied grumpy character, a role that fits him well. I couldn't believe how well Shirley Maclaine still looks at her age. She was pushing ninety in this movie, and honestly I couldn't tell. We can only wish to look that fit when we will hit ninety. I would give American Dreamer a 6.5 if it was possible on here.

'' American Dreamer '' had some material to work with, alas, it failed to do so.

The story had some heartwarming vibes when it came to the relationship between the new owner and the old lady.

It also had some comedy moments, some black comedy, some leaning more towards the sexual humour, which messed with the mood of the story though.

The pace of the story was also messy, thus, it ruined the enjoyament more often than not.

The perforamnces were good, though, by everyone in the cast and, especially, the leads.

So, overall, three out of ten for '' American Dreamer ''. It had potential but wasted them.

In quirky, meandering, sub-mediocre dramedy "American Dreamer" struggling college professor Peter Dinklage buys (with the help of realtor Matt Dillon) his dream mansion at a crazy low price by accepting its owner, elderly Shirley Maclaine, as its live-in tenant til she passes. Events complicate as Dinklage trysts with the likes of student Michelle Mylett & one of Maclaine's kids Kimberley Quinn (despite her staunch opposition to the house deal)... and private investigator Danny Glover gets involved too. What exactly notable writer Theodore Melfi was intending is unclear, but Paul Dektor (making various debut director goofs) surely didn't deliver it. Its a disappointingly mess.

I'm giving this 2 stars, for the "two stars," that's Peter and Shirley. My God I love, love , love Shirley, I'm a big fan, and I love Peter also... what I couldn't love, was this movie.

Obviously I was expecting something in the lines of their comedic or dramatic troupes, unfortunately it didn't happen and it was a huge disappointment.

The few moments of slapstick comedy were so obviously forced, that made me miss Blake Edwards and Peter Sellers. So I didn't laugh at all.

I think the problem nowadays is that everyone is trying too hard, and when it becomes obvious that everything is a copy of something already made (but better), it falls so flat that becomes annoying.

Becoming older, and the reality of death is a fact we could face in many ways...in this case, they finished the project as depressing. The only sort of funny line was the one about "past lives", a wink from Shirley, but it stopped there There's no emotions at all.

Sorry guys, this was a waste of talent and of my time.