In 60s Baltimore, an aspiring reporter pursues the murder of a forgotten young woman.In 60s Baltimore, an aspiring reporter pursues the murder of a forgotten young woman.In 60s Baltimore, an aspiring reporter pursues the murder of a forgotten young woman.
- Awards
- 2 nominations total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
Drama and story-telling for grown-ups.
I can see why some people don't like this. It's not conventional and simple story-telling. The two main characters, Cleo Johnson and Maddie Schwartz are deeply flawed people. Schwartz especially so, as she is quite unsympathetic and unlikeable. Johnson's story is that of a smart person who can't stop making bad choices. I find all this refreshing and relatable. It's so much more like real life. If you're bored with it, good for you - go back to your Marvel movies or 'Emily in Paris'.
I also get to play one of my favorite TV and movie games - spot the twist in advance. I know there's one or two big ones here, but by episode three they aren't revealed, so it's fun to try and guess. Maddie Schwartz was suspiciously quick in finding a murder victim in a very remote location; something tells me that will have a bearing on things.
Kudos also to Jennifer Mogbock in episode 1. Her character is forced to sing on stage while severely intoxicated and manages to turn it into something strange and beautiful. Actually 'strange and beautiful' sums up the best about this show when it's hitting its high notes.
I can see why some people don't like this. It's not conventional and simple story-telling. The two main characters, Cleo Johnson and Maddie Schwartz are deeply flawed people. Schwartz especially so, as she is quite unsympathetic and unlikeable. Johnson's story is that of a smart person who can't stop making bad choices. I find all this refreshing and relatable. It's so much more like real life. If you're bored with it, good for you - go back to your Marvel movies or 'Emily in Paris'.
I also get to play one of my favorite TV and movie games - spot the twist in advance. I know there's one or two big ones here, but by episode three they aren't revealed, so it's fun to try and guess. Maddie Schwartz was suspiciously quick in finding a murder victim in a very remote location; something tells me that will have a bearing on things.
Kudos also to Jennifer Mogbock in episode 1. Her character is forced to sing on stage while severely intoxicated and manages to turn it into something strange and beautiful. Actually 'strange and beautiful' sums up the best about this show when it's hitting its high notes.
The characters are strong, deep and the acting is superb. The story is good, as is the adaptation to the format. The main characters are not necessarily to be liked, but rather understood.
I'm only through the fourth episode and would binge the rest if they were available, but now I'll wait for the rest each week. The parallel storylines melt together and double the intrigue. I truly do not understand why anyone could hate on this series. I'm really enjoying it.
Too early to say for sure, but I suspect a couple of additional episodes might have helped. Some of the backstories could have used more development and depth. Overall, I'm glad that we gave it a watch and recommend it.
I'm only through the fourth episode and would binge the rest if they were available, but now I'll wait for the rest each week. The parallel storylines melt together and double the intrigue. I truly do not understand why anyone could hate on this series. I'm really enjoying it.
Too early to say for sure, but I suspect a couple of additional episodes might have helped. Some of the backstories could have used more development and depth. Overall, I'm glad that we gave it a watch and recommend it.
Beautifully shot, well acted but ultimately dull. Far too long to get to the point. I've given up after episode two.
This should have been an hour and a half long made for television film not a short series. I really dislike when programme makers drag a story out just to make it so many episodes long. They turn a good story well acted into something that turns viewers off because of the length of time it takes to tell that original good story.
Please programme makers just make a good film! Is it because they have to pay Natalie Portman a fortune to have a name on the cast and need to get their moneys worth? I don't know but I'm bored so 5 stars and I won't be watching any more.
This should have been an hour and a half long made for television film not a short series. I really dislike when programme makers drag a story out just to make it so many episodes long. They turn a good story well acted into something that turns viewers off because of the length of time it takes to tell that original good story.
Please programme makers just make a good film! Is it because they have to pay Natalie Portman a fortune to have a name on the cast and need to get their moneys worth? I don't know but I'm bored so 5 stars and I won't be watching any more.
It's 1966 Thanksgiving in Baltimore. A little Jewish girl gets taken by Santa Claus. Maddie Schwartz (Natalie Portman) has a connection to the girl and has a passing encounter with Cleo Johnson (Moses Ingram). Both women are mothers and struggling with the men in their lives. Both are downtrodden in different ways. Maddie leaves her husband and goes searching for the little girl. Cleo Johnson (Moses Ingram) is the narrator trying to survive her corrupt boss who runs the numbers and a savvy politician looking to clean up the corruption.
This limited series starts with a problem. I don't always like narrations and this one promises something. It's Cleo Johnson talking. She claims that Maddie comes in to write about her but doesn't actually know her life while she's alive. With that opening, I expect Cleo to be dead by the first episode. Instead, it's another character and let's not talk about the twist. Basically, it promises one thing and does a switch or two switches. I actually like the style and the story until the ending. This show has some good elements like Natalie Portman, but it keeps on dropping the ball.
This limited series starts with a problem. I don't always like narrations and this one promises something. It's Cleo Johnson talking. She claims that Maddie comes in to write about her but doesn't actually know her life while she's alive. With that opening, I expect Cleo to be dead by the first episode. Instead, it's another character and let's not talk about the twist. Basically, it promises one thing and does a switch or two switches. I actually like the style and the story until the ending. This show has some good elements like Natalie Portman, but it keeps on dropping the ball.
Natalie Portman investigates several mysterious murders in Lady In The Lake, an ambitious, gorgeously staged, often magnificent yet sometimes frustratingly cluttered miniseries based on a novel by Laura Lippman. In 1960's Baltimore the murder of an aight year old girl prompts Maddie Schwartz (Portman) to gravitate away from her marriage to a persnickety Jewish businessman (Brett Gelman) and take it upon herself to not only solve that one but the apparent suspicious drowning of one Cleo Johnson (Moses Ingram), an African American woman dredged up from the bottom of a lake. From there it launches into a horde of subplots that get so complicated and fill the narrative so full to the brim that at times it feels like each and every episode has enough content to be its own series. That's the issue here is that by the time all is said and done it's tough to discern or remember exactly what *was* said and was done, and there are several plot points that still feel muddy to me. Nevertheless, the performances are all excellent, Portman is fiercely committed as ever, Ingram is a revelation as Cleo as they're supported by all sorts of recognizable faces including the always terrific Pruitt Taylor Vince, Noah Jupe, Mikey Madison, Dylan Arnold, Byron Powers, Josiah Cross and The Wire's resident despicable crime kingpin Wood Harris here playing, you guessed it, another despicable crime kingpin. The attention to 60's period detail in terms of both production design and sociopolitical issues is admirable and it all feels very well mounted. But yeah.. the story is like accidentally opening a shaken up beer can and having everything inside erupt all at once over the course of seven very hectic, often disorienting episodes that should have been more measured, more paced... and far more succinctly explained at the end of the day.
Did you know
- TriviaWhile filming, production used the name Flamingo, a reference to the defunct Flamingo Lounge in Baltimore, Maryland, which appears in the novel.
- How many seasons does Lady in the Lake have?Powered by Alexa
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content