Don't Let Her In

...as in don't waste your time on this. Mercifully, this film is only 61 minutes long, so at least if you do happen to watch it, at least you won't be squandering too much of your life on it. The bad news is this story is so been-there-done-that it could have been told in a half-hour format. In fact, this story of a succubus-type demon has been told already in countless feature films before, and in quite a few horror anthology shows, also.

I'm giving it 3 stars instead of 1 for not wasting too much time telling its hackneyed story, and for having a bit of female nudity, too (I consider gratuitous female nudity to be a plus for any low-budget horror film).

All the good reviews were written by friends and relatives of the cast/director Absolute garbage!

There are lot of more interesting things to do instead of watching this , turning the tv off for example.

Remember going to the cinema when a main feature would always have a support movie on first ? Well his film running at just over the hour mark would be perfect for a Hollywood blockbuster horror.

It's a well trodden plot, been done a lot before. Rosemary's baby esk, witchcraft and the like.

Anyway the breakdown is.

Acting, good Lightning, good. Never too dark. A usual problem with horror movies.

Effects, cheesy but not overly cheap looking.

Plot. At an hour run time there isn't much of a one but it's fast paced which I liked.

Well worth an hour of any horror fans time. A beer and a pizza lovely night in.

From a lower score do to short playtime, its a small cast, devilish flick taking place i guess in boston, a girl moves in a a share housing project, and thats why its called ''dont let her in''. She starts spreading her vibes all over the place, and everything is turned into ruin.

Its a classic wanna make a helloween flick urges from the director and production crew, seems like a speedsters run to the finish line, with a barely survivable storyline and average acting. The filmatographic techniques and music though works, and a horror novice would get jolted im sure.special effects are cheap but sensible, but not enough for the grumpy old man. Its a norewatch from me.

Not sure what I expected from this. Back in the day it would definitely have been straight to video, that's for sure.

The acting is...wooden. Yeah, that's the word. There's only 4 credited cast and only two of them are anything other than tokens. 10/10 for the men being the token fillers, mind. One delivers his lines like he's reading them off the wall. The other is...quite convincing because I suspect he's just being himself.

The ladies are considerably better, though as they carry the bulk of the script and action they need to be. Not just eye candy. While they're unlikely to trouble the Oscars committee, they deliver.

The script isn't great, the storyline is almost non existent but the effects are OK (pretty good for the budget, in fact) and the ending is neat.

Well shot. Well directed. Worth seeing if you're bored but don't expect horror or soft porn because it isn't either, really. Just a slightly supernatural thriller.