IMDb RATING
7.7/10
3.5K
YOUR RATING
David Attenborough and scientist Johan Rockström examine Earth's biodiversity collapse and how this crisis can still be averted.David Attenborough and scientist Johan Rockström examine Earth's biodiversity collapse and how this crisis can still be averted.David Attenborough and scientist Johan Rockström examine Earth's biodiversity collapse and how this crisis can still be averted.
Photos
Elena Bennett
- Self - McGill University, Montréal
- (as Prof. Elena Bennett)
Jason Box
- Self - Geological Survey of Denmark & Greenland
- (as Prof. Jason Box)
Terry Hughes
- Self - Arc Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies
- (as Prof. Terry Hughes)
Anne Larigauderie
- Self - Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
- (as Prof. Anne Larigauderie)
María Neira
- Self - World Health Organisation
- (as Dr. María Neira)
Carlos Nobre
- Self - Institute of Advanced Studies University of Säo Paulo
- (as Prof. Carlos Nobre)
Daniella Teixeira
- Self - Environmentalist at University of Queensland
- (as Dr. Daniella Teixeira)
Greta Thunberg
- Self - Environment Activist
- (archive footage)
Ricarda Winkelmann
- Self - Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
- (as Prof. Ricarda Winkelmann)
Featured reviews
This is the most important of documentary of our generation. And it is very clear, easy to understand and impressive. Hats off to Sir David Attenborough and Professor Johan Rockstrom for creating this eye opening media.
One of the eye opening documentary I ever watched. Must watch/ Must recommend for everyone, watch for sake of the saving the our planet.
It is a very good documentary for sure. Everyone must understand that it is not just a small problem, but we are facing a global environmental crisis and we do not have 30-50 years more to start changing status quo of destroying everything around us. What was missed is the way how everyone can make an impact right away, without waiting for politicians to finally act. We need to adopt a fully plant-based diet to stop killing billions of animals each year, stop polluting rivers and oceans with cows' and pigs' manure, stop cutting forests so we could eat "less beef". We do not have time anymore for "less meat" and "flexitarian" nonsense. Our planet is dying, and we have mounting evidence that the plant-based diet is the best way how every single person can make the change. And yeah, side effect include better health, normal weight and a great feeling that you are not paying someone to keep living beings in terrible conditions with a brutal slaughter at the end of their short life so you could eat a steak for lunch.
David Attenborough is a hopeless optimist and in connection with the concept of Planetary Boundaries this gets to a point where it becomes nearly comical.
A major flaw of the film is that it is sometimes so unprecisein it's science that it verges on being incorrect. It insinuates, for example, that if we start living inside Planetary Boundaries today we cound somehow get all the toothpaste that has already left the tube back in. This is, especially for the climate boundary (and consequentially for the ocean acidification boundary, the connection of which is clearly explained in the film), simply not the case.
Another flaw is that the things we actually can do, right now, are given not very much space in the film. Especially the connection between a meat-centric diet an the bondaries land-use change, biodiversity loss and nitrogen/phosporous cycle are nor at all explained,
But what can I say? Johann Rockström on Netflix. All is not lost. This should receive a huge audience.
I also think that science is only one part of solving this puzzle. Mr. Rockstöm and Mr. Attenborough telling us that we can solve the crisis by cutting, as private citizens, our emissions in halfge every decade, is really, REALLY oversimplifying things. We as private citizens can rearrange the deckchairs but without politics steering the whole ship away from the iceberg this will not do, not by a long shot.
A major flaw of the film is that it is sometimes so unprecisein it's science that it verges on being incorrect. It insinuates, for example, that if we start living inside Planetary Boundaries today we cound somehow get all the toothpaste that has already left the tube back in. This is, especially for the climate boundary (and consequentially for the ocean acidification boundary, the connection of which is clearly explained in the film), simply not the case.
Another flaw is that the things we actually can do, right now, are given not very much space in the film. Especially the connection between a meat-centric diet an the bondaries land-use change, biodiversity loss and nitrogen/phosporous cycle are nor at all explained,
But what can I say? Johann Rockström on Netflix. All is not lost. This should receive a huge audience.
I also think that science is only one part of solving this puzzle. Mr. Rockstöm and Mr. Attenborough telling us that we can solve the crisis by cutting, as private citizens, our emissions in halfge every decade, is really, REALLY oversimplifying things. We as private citizens can rearrange the deckchairs but without politics steering the whole ship away from the iceberg this will not do, not by a long shot.
Did you know
- ConnectionsReferences Mad Max (1979)
- How long is Breaking Boundaries: The Science of Our Planet?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Руйнуючи межі: Науковий погляд на нашу планету
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1 hour, 13 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content