After mysteriously inheriting an abandoned coastal property, Ben and his family accidentally unleash an ancient, long-dormant creature that terrorized the entire region-including his own anc... Read allAfter mysteriously inheriting an abandoned coastal property, Ben and his family accidentally unleash an ancient, long-dormant creature that terrorized the entire region-including his own ancestors-for generations.After mysteriously inheriting an abandoned coastal property, Ben and his family accidentally unleash an ancient, long-dormant creature that terrorized the entire region-including his own ancestors-for generations.
Matt Whelan
- Ben
- (as Matthew Whelan)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
If you survive the first 40 minutes or so (of introduction) without falling into Morpheus's gentle and comforting arms, you get a pretty standard "horror" flick with some monsters, lots of stupid decisions, in the end I rooted for the beasts. The Tank tries to be something like The Descent but can't compete on any level - production, story, thrill, acting, everything is inferior to The Descent. The premise of The Tank is not that bad, maybe even interesting, but the execution is, well, just boring. Recommendation: if you want to really waste some time (like I did), maybe with the notion that you are immortal and you have a lot of time to waste, put The Tank on your menu, if not, watch something else.
It's not that The Tank is a completely horrible film.
The acting is rather decent.
The monster is kind of cool (at least it's not horribly rendered with CGI).
And it has a dark and foreboding atmosphere.
The basic premise here, is that a giant storm, in the distant past, washed a bunch of axolotls (or other such amphibious creatures) from the ocean, into the septic tank of a house in a remote community...causing them to mutate into carnivorous human-eating salamanders (or, possibly, reptiles)...as a result of their exposure to human excrement.
At least that is what is implied...I think.
However, it's rather hard to get around the ridiculous logic on which the story is based.
First and foremost, the way the father finds and enters the tank- which supposedly awakens/releases the beast- is absurd.
Literally noone goes to a new place...sees an overgrown grate...and is overcome with the curiosity to lift and enter it.
It's just not plausible, or believable.
And comes off completely forced.
Not to mention, axolotls don't even live in the ocean...and if they did get washed into a septic tank (by some freak course of nature)...that doesn't really meet the criteria of them becoming "land based" creatures.
On top of that...not only is the whole first half of the film incredibly basic...it's also rather boring.
With the introduction of characters (outside of the family) coming off as equally forced as the father entering the septic tank in the first place.
Plus, the way the monster first appears, also doesn't make any sense- as it seems to be some sort of supernatural force, as opposed to an actual flesh and blood creature.
I guess, if you can suspend disbelief- and ignore all the logical inconsistencies around which the story is based- you can garner some enjoyment from watching the film...despite it's mediocrity.
You just have to accept that it is all some sort of divine cosmic intervention, to bring karmic justice upon a family that dabbles in the trafficking of endangered species (for the purpose of the pet trade).
At least they put a little imagination into it...by taking some of the world's cutest creatures...and transforming them into terrifying monstrous beasts, hellbent on the destruction of humanity.
So...there's that, at least.
But I can't help but think that this was a completely avoidable situation.
3.5 out of 10.
The acting is rather decent.
The monster is kind of cool (at least it's not horribly rendered with CGI).
And it has a dark and foreboding atmosphere.
The basic premise here, is that a giant storm, in the distant past, washed a bunch of axolotls (or other such amphibious creatures) from the ocean, into the septic tank of a house in a remote community...causing them to mutate into carnivorous human-eating salamanders (or, possibly, reptiles)...as a result of their exposure to human excrement.
At least that is what is implied...I think.
However, it's rather hard to get around the ridiculous logic on which the story is based.
First and foremost, the way the father finds and enters the tank- which supposedly awakens/releases the beast- is absurd.
Literally noone goes to a new place...sees an overgrown grate...and is overcome with the curiosity to lift and enter it.
It's just not plausible, or believable.
And comes off completely forced.
Not to mention, axolotls don't even live in the ocean...and if they did get washed into a septic tank (by some freak course of nature)...that doesn't really meet the criteria of them becoming "land based" creatures.
On top of that...not only is the whole first half of the film incredibly basic...it's also rather boring.
With the introduction of characters (outside of the family) coming off as equally forced as the father entering the septic tank in the first place.
Plus, the way the monster first appears, also doesn't make any sense- as it seems to be some sort of supernatural force, as opposed to an actual flesh and blood creature.
I guess, if you can suspend disbelief- and ignore all the logical inconsistencies around which the story is based- you can garner some enjoyment from watching the film...despite it's mediocrity.
You just have to accept that it is all some sort of divine cosmic intervention, to bring karmic justice upon a family that dabbles in the trafficking of endangered species (for the purpose of the pet trade).
At least they put a little imagination into it...by taking some of the world's cutest creatures...and transforming them into terrifying monstrous beasts, hellbent on the destruction of humanity.
So...there's that, at least.
But I can't help but think that this was a completely avoidable situation.
3.5 out of 10.
There are some good things about this movie - I don't mind the creatures and there were some creepy bits, but this is overshadowed by the ridiculous bits. Like pouring your super irritating chemicals into the water of a massive tank as if they won't just dilute immediately. Or wandering around in the dark wondering if something is out there while something out in the forest makes prehistoric noises that would scare the hell out of anyone. The most puzzling bit is the disappearing windows of cars. These disappear to let beasties in but then reappear when the danger is over. It is amazingly lazy filmmaking. I'm prepared to suspend logic for a horror but the disappearing window glass took it that step too far.
50/100 marks from me. Started off really well. Interesting concept and cinematography. But then just went the way of current Hollywood. The male character just incompetent and couldn't do anything, not even smart enough to ever bring a weapon or a knife with him to try and fight the creature. I did however enjoyed the score but wish my audio change editing was better.
That being said everything else was not great. Contrary to most of the other reviews I was actually kind of feeling the beginning, but the continuity in this film ruined the whole thing for me. Also I understand that people don't always make the best decisions in horror movies but god was this hard to watch during the climax.
The Tank had an interesting premise. The idea was semi-original. The setting was beautiful and creepy at the same time. Some decent tense moments. Overall, an ok scary movie to pass the time.
That being said everything else was not great. Contrary to most of the other reviews I was actually kind of feeling the beginning, but the continuity in this film ruined the whole thing for me. Also I understand that people don't always make the best decisions in horror movies but god was this hard to watch during the climax.
The Tank had an interesting premise. The idea was semi-original. The setting was beautiful and creepy at the same time. Some decent tense moments. Overall, an ok scary movie to pass the time.
All of my life I've seen horror films. Along with science fiction and fantasy, these are my staple. I've seen more than three decades of movies and TV shows.
This film's premise is about a creature that has adapted to stalking its prey in absolute darkness. The creature has spawned and is expanding its territory. Ironically the creature's next prey are human beings, themselves invaders of the animal kingdom. This seems almost like a documentary, the way I've explained the creature and its habits.
The movie is about a family of three moving into the owner's parents house that was left abandoned for many years following an accident.
Soon they discover they are not alone, and something sinister is stalking them that lives under their house.
Verdict: average acting, above average real special effects not CGI, good sound-effects and photography. But the script and direction is questionable. Don't expect a solid climax to a film like this with a bad script. The movie's ending leads me to believe possibly a sequel is on the way, not that I'd be intrigued enough to see it.
More classic creature movies: The Silver Bullet(1985), The Monster Squad(1987), Killer Klowns From Outer Space(1988) and Tremors(1990).
Thank you for reading this review and as Mister Spock always says: live long and prosper.
This film's premise is about a creature that has adapted to stalking its prey in absolute darkness. The creature has spawned and is expanding its territory. Ironically the creature's next prey are human beings, themselves invaders of the animal kingdom. This seems almost like a documentary, the way I've explained the creature and its habits.
The movie is about a family of three moving into the owner's parents house that was left abandoned for many years following an accident.
Soon they discover they are not alone, and something sinister is stalking them that lives under their house.
Verdict: average acting, above average real special effects not CGI, good sound-effects and photography. But the script and direction is questionable. Don't expect a solid climax to a film like this with a bad script. The movie's ending leads me to believe possibly a sequel is on the way, not that I'd be intrigued enough to see it.
More classic creature movies: The Silver Bullet(1985), The Monster Squad(1987), Killer Klowns From Outer Space(1988) and Tremors(1990).
Thank you for reading this review and as Mister Spock always says: live long and prosper.
Did you know
- TriviaThe creature effects were done practically.
- GoofsWhen Jules spots the creature in the window, she only sees the top of its head, yet she describes it as having big claws and teeth, which she couldn't actually see.
- How long is The Tank?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Щось
- Filming locations
- Bethells Beach, Auckland, New Zealand(Hobbit's Bay)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $86,378
- Runtime1 hour 40 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content