470 reviews
I loved the first movie. It felt like a proper 3 act story structure. This movie however felt unfinished. As if it were just half a movie. All preamble for a finale. Some parts were interesting and gave context but it felt like it was just Act 1 bordering on the 2nd act of a full story.
The acting was good, the world building was absolutely needed and expanded the world. The movie however had no tangible resolution, the ending couldnt even be called a cliffhanger. I found myself sitting there at the end asking "was that it?" I hope they dont decide to wait years to release the next part of this story. They should have doubled the length and released it as one film.
The acting was good, the world building was absolutely needed and expanded the world. The movie however had no tangible resolution, the ending couldnt even be called a cliffhanger. I found myself sitting there at the end asking "was that it?" I hope they dont decide to wait years to release the next part of this story. They should have doubled the length and released it as one film.
- jeffkresse-81386
- Jul 1, 2025
- Permalink
- mollygemini
- Jul 1, 2025
- Permalink
I literally just created an account just to write this because that's how baffled I am. It's not every day I watch a movie and feel like I've been robbed of two hours I'll never get back. The first movie? Not exactly Oscar-worthy, but hey, it did its job as a popcorn flick. This sequel though? A two-hour cinematic lullaby. And when the credits finally roll after what feels like an eternity you'll blink, look around, and wonder if your TV accidentally skipped an entire final act. Then comes the existential crisis: this actually got made. By real people. With a budget. And probably a marketing team. Let that sink in.
- DanielC-2139
- Jul 1, 2025
- Permalink
Sorry, but as this is a sequel, I have to compare to the first one. And boy oh boy, what an utter disappointment. So many shortcuts, so many empty and void characters. They could have made something good with Uma's arrival but no, just an empty movie. Oh, and the fight choreography is definitely not up to the first one. Also way less violent than the first. And the story in itself is not bad per se, but the way it is shown is just plain déjà-vu. Also, the way some characters interact with each other feels fake, too many inconsistencies.
My advice, go watch the first one and stay at that, you'll spent better your time.
My advice, go watch the first one and stay at that, you'll spent better your time.
- armandraithaqua
- Jul 1, 2025
- Permalink
First of, I quite liked the first one. It was not the greatest movie ever, not by a long shot. But it was quite enjoyable.
Here we have a "typical sequel" in the worst kind of way. It takes bits of the original one and weaves it into into a very obscure second part that does not make sense at all.
I was looking forward to seing Uma Thurman again, but her role is actually rather small, not interesting and not very well played.
They opted for fight scenes rather than substance or at least a storyline and the result is just boring, pointless and disappointing.
Worst of all, it looks like they are going for a third part, which I will definitely NOT watch.
Here we have a "typical sequel" in the worst kind of way. It takes bits of the original one and weaves it into into a very obscure second part that does not make sense at all.
I was looking forward to seing Uma Thurman again, but her role is actually rather small, not interesting and not very well played.
They opted for fight scenes rather than substance or at least a storyline and the result is just boring, pointless and disappointing.
Worst of all, it looks like they are going for a third part, which I will definitely NOT watch.
Far from the first one. While it was not any kind of masterpiece, it was entertaining and presented an interesting group of characyers.
This second part is dull as hell. It starts ok and then it (and the audience) falls asleep. Pretty much half of the movie is about manifesting drama out of nothing by lingering on facial expressions for waaaay toooo loooong (stare at face, stare at the opposing face, don't say a word, just stare, repeat with the next scene, and no movement do not move while this happens, stop the world from revolving so everyone can stare and really analyse those expressions in detail). The actors do ok but in my opinion they are very limited by this style of directing where every line on dialogue is delivered when the world basically stops during thesw scenes (this seems to be very common these days). I do not need to stare at faces or hear their names repeated every other sentence. This just feels lifeless and kind of unnatural.
While some of all this babbling provides more backstory and perhaps a hint of world building, it is a very small part of the movie. Some things are also repeated like six times in a row when they were already obvious. "So there's this myth that tells about a thing that happens when a specific immortal does this other thing to another immortal." (points to a random book with a couple of colorfull images). The othe guy basically replies, "Aah... so that happened because they did that things in the last movie". Oh yeah dudes, please repeat it again, please, I didn't already figure it out ages ago. I literally skipped ahead in some scenes because they took waaayyyy tooo looong. I would have much rather seen much more of the lore and spent much more times digging up the past, like actually researching things instead of just walking into this cool ancient library which apparently contained all the lore and history of the immortals. There was even this whole encyclopedia set about The Old Guard and it was stolen, which we see in a useless dreamclip - useless because it just shows them being taken and nothing about why or how that moment came to be, and also the librarian says this afterwards just to make sure that we got it. The whole movie kind of skips over everything that would have served as a great basis for a real sequel. Could have even been a prequel that would have given much more context and depth to everything. Now this is all super simple and apparently just a matter of walking into a library that almost no one knew existed (except the main character and the librarian, obviously).
There is rather little action and most and when it starts the movie actually ends. Someone probably yelled "We're running out of film in two minutes!" and they just cut it short in the middle of a scene almost. Perhaps the third one is supposed to give Uma Thurman's cahracter some substance because here she is pretty much useless. And maybe it will explore the past more in general. Who knows. I'll still watch it but I won't be expecting it wven nearly as much as I did this.
This second part is dull as hell. It starts ok and then it (and the audience) falls asleep. Pretty much half of the movie is about manifesting drama out of nothing by lingering on facial expressions for waaaay toooo loooong (stare at face, stare at the opposing face, don't say a word, just stare, repeat with the next scene, and no movement do not move while this happens, stop the world from revolving so everyone can stare and really analyse those expressions in detail). The actors do ok but in my opinion they are very limited by this style of directing where every line on dialogue is delivered when the world basically stops during thesw scenes (this seems to be very common these days). I do not need to stare at faces or hear their names repeated every other sentence. This just feels lifeless and kind of unnatural.
While some of all this babbling provides more backstory and perhaps a hint of world building, it is a very small part of the movie. Some things are also repeated like six times in a row when they were already obvious. "So there's this myth that tells about a thing that happens when a specific immortal does this other thing to another immortal." (points to a random book with a couple of colorfull images). The othe guy basically replies, "Aah... so that happened because they did that things in the last movie". Oh yeah dudes, please repeat it again, please, I didn't already figure it out ages ago. I literally skipped ahead in some scenes because they took waaayyyy tooo looong. I would have much rather seen much more of the lore and spent much more times digging up the past, like actually researching things instead of just walking into this cool ancient library which apparently contained all the lore and history of the immortals. There was even this whole encyclopedia set about The Old Guard and it was stolen, which we see in a useless dreamclip - useless because it just shows them being taken and nothing about why or how that moment came to be, and also the librarian says this afterwards just to make sure that we got it. The whole movie kind of skips over everything that would have served as a great basis for a real sequel. Could have even been a prequel that would have given much more context and depth to everything. Now this is all super simple and apparently just a matter of walking into a library that almost no one knew existed (except the main character and the librarian, obviously).
There is rather little action and most and when it starts the movie actually ends. Someone probably yelled "We're running out of film in two minutes!" and they just cut it short in the middle of a scene almost. Perhaps the third one is supposed to give Uma Thurman's cahracter some substance because here she is pretty much useless. And maybe it will explore the past more in general. Who knows. I'll still watch it but I won't be expecting it wven nearly as much as I did this.
So, Andy and her team of immortal warriors are once again saving humanity from yet another global threat - this time, a powerful enemy that threatens the very existence of the Old Guard. Sounds promising, but...
Let's start with the positives: solid action, well-staged fight scenes, and a vibrant visual style that's pleasing to the eye. The cast is undeniably strong - Charlize Theron and Uma Thurman carry much of the film simply by being on screen.
But things start to fall apart the moment you pay attention to the plot. It's painfully simplistic, as if aimed at a teenage audience with no expectations for logic or narrative depth. The ending is particularly frustrating - abrupt, unresolved, and lacking any real payoff, as if someone just stopped the film halfway through the third act.
Overall, it's a flashy but hollow shell. Worth a single watch, perhaps - but don't expect it to linger.
But things start to fall apart the moment you pay attention to the plot. It's painfully simplistic, as if aimed at a teenage audience with no expectations for logic or narrative depth. The ending is particularly frustrating - abrupt, unresolved, and lacking any real payoff, as if someone just stopped the film halfway through the third act.
Overall, it's a flashy but hollow shell. Worth a single watch, perhaps - but don't expect it to linger.
- MovimanBond
- Jul 1, 2025
- Permalink
My god why?
I am a lover of entertainment. I respect the films by what they are. That is why i love(d) fast and the furious franchise, mission: impossible, heck, i loved the other guys and movies like that. And i loved the first movie, the old guard.
But what is this? Half a movie? And so poorly paced, made, no momentum, no passion or ideas.... how does netflix do it? How can it aim and achoe the worst possible outcome?? That is why alghoritms are no match for criativity and art. Aiming at everyone, the please no one. It sucks.
I wish they let writera write and produce good content. Look at Apple. They are killing it!
I am a lover of entertainment. I respect the films by what they are. That is why i love(d) fast and the furious franchise, mission: impossible, heck, i loved the other guys and movies like that. And i loved the first movie, the old guard.
But what is this? Half a movie? And so poorly paced, made, no momentum, no passion or ideas.... how does netflix do it? How can it aim and achoe the worst possible outcome?? That is why alghoritms are no match for criativity and art. Aiming at everyone, the please no one. It sucks.
I wish they let writera write and produce good content. Look at Apple. They are killing it!
- miguelgbsa
- Jul 2, 2025
- Permalink
I loved the first installment; I've watched it several times and usually fall back to it at least once a year. This second installment just felt like a long episode before the series finale. No real conclusion, just a setup for the next installment. I didn't dislike this, there's just too much left undone. A movie should have a beginning, middle, and end... all three acts. I did enjoy the expansion of the lore and introduction of new characters. Most of the fight scenes were well-executed, especially the first with Andy using the sword & embracing her mortality. Her techniques showed ages of experience. Some of the fights turned Marvel which are cringe in a film like this. I'll watch the first installment again because it's self-contained and good. I'll watch this second once more, just before the third comes out as a refresher.
- johnnycresfit
- Jul 2, 2025
- Permalink
Nothing happend. Just a bunch of people talking and doing nothing. The movie contains a total of 3 fighting scenes. I waited the entire movie for the movie to start and then suddenly the move ended. They put 5 years into making this movie and this is all they did. I think the director is playing with ous. The fights that do happen are over in seconds and feel like filler. No impact, no stakes, no energy. Just a quick punch here, a slow-motion kick there, and done. You blink and miss it.
It's like the whole film is scared to actually do anything. Every time it seems like something might finally happen, it pulls back and gives you more awkward silence and vague stares. By the end, I wasn't even frustrated anymore, just tired.
It's honestly hard to tell if they were trying to make something deep or if they just forgot to finish the script. Either way, watching it feels like a waste of time.
It's like the whole film is scared to actually do anything. Every time it seems like something might finally happen, it pulls back and gives you more awkward silence and vague stares. By the end, I wasn't even frustrated anymore, just tired.
It's honestly hard to tell if they were trying to make something deep or if they just forgot to finish the script. Either way, watching it feels like a waste of time.
- Swordslayer122
- Jul 1, 2025
- Permalink
Being completely honest I read some of these reviews and I don't quite understand where it's coming from.
Granted! It's not an Oscar worthy performance from anybody. I really enjoyed the first film and how it established a good story as well as being an action flick.
What was I expecting from this? I'll tell you what I was expecting.... to watch some more immortals, maybe expand on some of the lore of why they have immortality And watch immortals fight.
I personally feel I got exactly that. So if you are after more mortals fighting, then this films for you, if not, then I suggest you give it a miss.
Granted! It's not an Oscar worthy performance from anybody. I really enjoyed the first film and how it established a good story as well as being an action flick.
What was I expecting from this? I'll tell you what I was expecting.... to watch some more immortals, maybe expand on some of the lore of why they have immortality And watch immortals fight.
I personally feel I got exactly that. So if you are after more mortals fighting, then this films for you, if not, then I suggest you give it a miss.
- johnrandall-64435
- Jul 3, 2025
- Permalink
I enjoyed the first Old Guard. It was a little hokey, but a good story line and an interesting action movie. The acting was above par and the production levels high.
This installment leaves a lot to be desired. The story feels disjointed and all over the place, and the characters are very one dimensional. Uma Thurman is a wasted talent with the lines she is given.
The fact that the movie ends needing there to be a third movie feels like a con to me. Almost like forcing me to be excited to watch another one, but after this one I'm not sure I wanna.
The fight scenes are good though.
Maybe I expected too much.
This installment leaves a lot to be desired. The story feels disjointed and all over the place, and the characters are very one dimensional. Uma Thurman is a wasted talent with the lines she is given.
The fact that the movie ends needing there to be a third movie feels like a con to me. Almost like forcing me to be excited to watch another one, but after this one I'm not sure I wanna.
The fight scenes are good though.
Maybe I expected too much.
- michael-cabral2
- Jul 1, 2025
- Permalink
It's ultimately a waste of time and resources, offering little more than a drawn-out teaser for the third film. It's frustrating that it's being marketed as a standalone movie when, in reality, it functions more like an extended trailer - a transparent attempt to squeeze more money out of the franchise. The plot is painfully predictable, filled with recycled tropes and no real sense of suspense or originality. The acting feels hollow, with the cast more focused on striking dramatic poses than delivering genuine emotion. Overall, it lacks depth, substance, and entertainment value. It's simply not worth the ticket price or the time invested.
There's definitely some action here, but it feels completely soulless. The first movie had an amazing story, deep emotional pull, and unforgettable action.
This one feels rushed-like they had two weeks to throw something together just to make money. There's no real connection, no depth, just a bunch of random scenes stitched together. Even the ending felt weird and unsatisfying.
The actors weren't bad, but the whole thing felt off. Honestly, it just capitalism in action.
Do yourself a favor...skip this and go for a walk in nature instead.
I dont know what is it with these movies, Also the music was off too at least for me..
This one feels rushed-like they had two weeks to throw something together just to make money. There's no real connection, no depth, just a bunch of random scenes stitched together. Even the ending felt weird and unsatisfying.
The actors weren't bad, but the whole thing felt off. Honestly, it just capitalism in action.
Do yourself a favor...skip this and go for a walk in nature instead.
I dont know what is it with these movies, Also the music was off too at least for me..
- marekkamenicky
- Jul 1, 2025
- Permalink
What was that? Where did the second half of the film go? My five points are lenient, as I like the first movie, the story, and the actors. I was really excited about this film and also curious to see what would become of Quynh after lying at the bottom of the sea for 500 years and dying about 4 million times. That must do something to you. But no! After 45 minutes, I was wondering when the film would finally start. It was so slow, and ultimately the story is just boring. Just as disappointing as Highlander 2 ;-). And shortly before the end, I realized that this film has no ending, and Netflix had simply ripped me off.
- sven-49-694776
- Jul 1, 2025
- Permalink
- neeltje_wijnen
- Jul 1, 2025
- Permalink
And the price for waiting for an eternity for the sequel is that it is not as good as the first.
I liked it but I am a big fan of the first so I think in really wanting it to be good and carry on the story I might have been more than forgiving but I do have some observations and questions:
1) It felt different, it was a little off is the best way I can put it. It was funny in the beginning and the action was great, but the flavor was off if I can put it that way.
2) Charlize, Nikki and the rest of the group were as good as the first, but it felt a little disjointed as it went on.
3) There was a completely different Director for this one than the first and I think it shows. I don't know if that has to do with Victoria Mahoney's Directorial job on this or if it was just a different style than Gina Prince-Bythewood, who directed the first one. On that level I think The Old Guard was better, felt more coherent story and scene wise.
4) Uma Thurman as Discord seemed a little one dimensional to me, you really didn't get a good sense of the character she was playing, again I don't know if maybe that has to do with direction. And the fight scene at the end with Andy and Discord was less than spectacular. I feel given Charlize, Uma and the characters it should have been way more dramatic. Was it the directing?
5) How come Discord was able to find Quynh and release her from her watery torture but Andy couldn't find her after 500 years of trying?
6) And once again we are left with a cliffhanger......completely sets itself up for another movie with nothing but questions in your head........The biggest one being will we see a third movie and when? How long will we have to wait this time? And will there be ANOTHER Director? Who?
I liked it but I am a big fan of the first so I think in really wanting it to be good and carry on the story I might have been more than forgiving but I do have some observations and questions:
1) It felt different, it was a little off is the best way I can put it. It was funny in the beginning and the action was great, but the flavor was off if I can put it that way.
2) Charlize, Nikki and the rest of the group were as good as the first, but it felt a little disjointed as it went on.
3) There was a completely different Director for this one than the first and I think it shows. I don't know if that has to do with Victoria Mahoney's Directorial job on this or if it was just a different style than Gina Prince-Bythewood, who directed the first one. On that level I think The Old Guard was better, felt more coherent story and scene wise.
4) Uma Thurman as Discord seemed a little one dimensional to me, you really didn't get a good sense of the character she was playing, again I don't know if maybe that has to do with direction. And the fight scene at the end with Andy and Discord was less than spectacular. I feel given Charlize, Uma and the characters it should have been way more dramatic. Was it the directing?
5) How come Discord was able to find Quynh and release her from her watery torture but Andy couldn't find her after 500 years of trying?
6) And once again we are left with a cliffhanger......completely sets itself up for another movie with nothing but questions in your head........The biggest one being will we see a third movie and when? How long will we have to wait this time? And will there be ANOTHER Director? Who?
- streamingmovienight
- Jul 4, 2025
- Permalink
- raymondaholland
- Jul 5, 2025
- Permalink
I was eagerly waiting for this one but kind of felt that the director was not paid well and the writers too.
I never expected that all this hype and wait will go in vain. Since the opening scene till the end of the movie, it looked like the director had no vision or lost in Making. The immortals had no connection on screen, neither they looked interested in their characters. Major disappointment.
Talk about action. It was not even half Of first part And needless to say that it was the ending, which left no curiosity to wait for the next part.
Even took a nap in between. Watched it only for charlize Theron.... No matter how harder one try but this woman always looks beautiful.
I never expected that all this hype and wait will go in vain. Since the opening scene till the end of the movie, it looked like the director had no vision or lost in Making. The immortals had no connection on screen, neither they looked interested in their characters. Major disappointment.
Talk about action. It was not even half Of first part And needless to say that it was the ending, which left no curiosity to wait for the next part.
Even took a nap in between. Watched it only for charlize Theron.... No matter how harder one try but this woman always looks beautiful.
- hamzab-945
- Jul 1, 2025
- Permalink
The casting was solid overall, with a strong set of actors and actresses. Uma was a pleasant surprise, and the performances across the board elevated the material. However, the writing left much to be desired.
For a character who had been trapped underwater for 500 years, I expected to see more rage and complexity. Instead, the emotional depth felt limited and oddly childlike, not what you would expect from someone over 1,000 years old. This shortcoming was clearly due to the writing rather than the acting. Without giving spoilers, I'll just say that many of her actions made no sense within the context of her experience and history.
The plot also felt scattered. There was simply too much happening at once, and the multiple storylines diluted the overall impact. The transition to the ending was weak, which made the conclusion feel unsatisfying despite some strong moments along the way.
Visually, the fight scenes were well done and provided some of the film's best moments. But I have to comment on the main actress's look: the mullet haircut was an odd choice. I understand the idea of changing her appearance for cover, but compared to how striking she looked in the first film, this change felt unnecessary, especially since the rest of the crew's look remained consistent. She's still beautiful, of course, but the mullet added nothing.
In the end, if it weren't for the fight scenes and the exceptional acting, the film would have fallen flat under the weight of average writing and too many competing plotlines. What's next? The metaverse? (Just kidding.)
I just couldn't see myself giving it less that a 6 because the acting was good. But compared to the first movie, the story line changed the characters in a way that bogged down the excitement of waiting 5 years. I'm not even anticipating part 3.
For a character who had been trapped underwater for 500 years, I expected to see more rage and complexity. Instead, the emotional depth felt limited and oddly childlike, not what you would expect from someone over 1,000 years old. This shortcoming was clearly due to the writing rather than the acting. Without giving spoilers, I'll just say that many of her actions made no sense within the context of her experience and history.
The plot also felt scattered. There was simply too much happening at once, and the multiple storylines diluted the overall impact. The transition to the ending was weak, which made the conclusion feel unsatisfying despite some strong moments along the way.
Visually, the fight scenes were well done and provided some of the film's best moments. But I have to comment on the main actress's look: the mullet haircut was an odd choice. I understand the idea of changing her appearance for cover, but compared to how striking she looked in the first film, this change felt unnecessary, especially since the rest of the crew's look remained consistent. She's still beautiful, of course, but the mullet added nothing.
In the end, if it weren't for the fight scenes and the exceptional acting, the film would have fallen flat under the weight of average writing and too many competing plotlines. What's next? The metaverse? (Just kidding.)
I just couldn't see myself giving it less that a 6 because the acting was good. But compared to the first movie, the story line changed the characters in a way that bogged down the excitement of waiting 5 years. I'm not even anticipating part 3.
- paul_oakley-932-990599
- Jul 1, 2025
- Permalink
I recently watched The Old Guard 2 and felt compelled to share my thoughts, particularly because I strongly disagree with many of the critical reviews circulating online. While some viewers have labeled the film's story as "pointless" or disappointing, I believe the opposite is true. In my view, The Old Guard 2 is a worthy and engaging sequel that builds meaningfully on the first film's foundation and leaves me excited for what might come next.
First and foremost, the film's plot twist was one of its most satisfying elements. Without revealing spoilers, I thought it was a clever development that added depth to the overarching narrative. Rather than simply repeating the formula of the original movie, the sequel dared to expand the mythology and explore the emotional consequences of immortality and loyalty among the core group of characters. For me, this twist gave the film a sense of momentum and purpose, setting the stage for an even more intriguing future storyline.
Another significant strength of The Old Guard 2 is the phenomenal acting across the board. Charlize Theron remains magnetic as Andy, blending strength, weariness, and subtle vulnerability. She continues to convey the burdens of a life lived over centuries while maintaining the grit and fierce presence that made her character so compelling in the first film. Equally impressive were the supporting actors, each of whom delivered performances that felt grounded and emotionally authentic. The camaraderie among the immortals was palpable, and the conflicts they face felt genuine and earned.
Moreover, the film succeeds in maintaining a balance between action and character-driven storytelling. The action sequences are choreographed with precision and energy, providing plenty of thrilling moments without overwhelming the narrative. Yet, in between the intense fight scenes, the film allows space for quieter, reflective moments that deepen our understanding of the characters' relationships and internal struggles. This combination keeps the audience both emotionally engaged and entertained.
Visually, the movie is a treat for the senses. From sweeping landscapes to close-quarters combat, the cinematography is polished and stylish. The film makes excellent use of lighting, color, and movement to create a vivid and immersive world. The editing is tight, and while the pacing is fast, it never feels rushed. Instead, the story unfolds with an urgency that kept me invested from start to finish.
As for the criticism that the film "has no point," I have to respectfully disagree. The story, in my view, explores meaningful themes such as the cost of immortality, the morality of violence even for noble causes, and the personal sacrifices made in the pursuit of justice and protection. The characters wrestle with their pasts, their identities, and their responsibilities, creating a narrative that is far from pointless. These themes might not always be delivered in an overtly dramatic fashion, but they are certainly woven into the film's fabric, adding depth beyond the action.
If I were to offer any critique, it would be that certain subplots or secondary characters could have been developed a bit further. A couple of narrative threads felt slightly underexplored, leaving me wanting more context or resolution. However, these are relatively minor issues that did not significantly detract from my enjoyment of the film as a whole.
In conclusion, I give The Old Guard 2 a strong 8 out of 10. It is an exciting, well-acted, and visually impressive sequel that honors the spirit of the original while carving out new territory. The film's twisty plot, combined with compelling performances and expertly executed action, makes it a highly satisfying watch. I, for one, am looking forward to the next installment and believe that this franchise still has plenty of rich stories left to tell.
For anyone hesitant because of negative reviews, I encourage you to give The Old Guard 2 a chance. You might find, as I did, that there's much more substance and entertainment here than the critics suggest.
First and foremost, the film's plot twist was one of its most satisfying elements. Without revealing spoilers, I thought it was a clever development that added depth to the overarching narrative. Rather than simply repeating the formula of the original movie, the sequel dared to expand the mythology and explore the emotional consequences of immortality and loyalty among the core group of characters. For me, this twist gave the film a sense of momentum and purpose, setting the stage for an even more intriguing future storyline.
Another significant strength of The Old Guard 2 is the phenomenal acting across the board. Charlize Theron remains magnetic as Andy, blending strength, weariness, and subtle vulnerability. She continues to convey the burdens of a life lived over centuries while maintaining the grit and fierce presence that made her character so compelling in the first film. Equally impressive were the supporting actors, each of whom delivered performances that felt grounded and emotionally authentic. The camaraderie among the immortals was palpable, and the conflicts they face felt genuine and earned.
Moreover, the film succeeds in maintaining a balance between action and character-driven storytelling. The action sequences are choreographed with precision and energy, providing plenty of thrilling moments without overwhelming the narrative. Yet, in between the intense fight scenes, the film allows space for quieter, reflective moments that deepen our understanding of the characters' relationships and internal struggles. This combination keeps the audience both emotionally engaged and entertained.
Visually, the movie is a treat for the senses. From sweeping landscapes to close-quarters combat, the cinematography is polished and stylish. The film makes excellent use of lighting, color, and movement to create a vivid and immersive world. The editing is tight, and while the pacing is fast, it never feels rushed. Instead, the story unfolds with an urgency that kept me invested from start to finish.
As for the criticism that the film "has no point," I have to respectfully disagree. The story, in my view, explores meaningful themes such as the cost of immortality, the morality of violence even for noble causes, and the personal sacrifices made in the pursuit of justice and protection. The characters wrestle with their pasts, their identities, and their responsibilities, creating a narrative that is far from pointless. These themes might not always be delivered in an overtly dramatic fashion, but they are certainly woven into the film's fabric, adding depth beyond the action.
If I were to offer any critique, it would be that certain subplots or secondary characters could have been developed a bit further. A couple of narrative threads felt slightly underexplored, leaving me wanting more context or resolution. However, these are relatively minor issues that did not significantly detract from my enjoyment of the film as a whole.
In conclusion, I give The Old Guard 2 a strong 8 out of 10. It is an exciting, well-acted, and visually impressive sequel that honors the spirit of the original while carving out new territory. The film's twisty plot, combined with compelling performances and expertly executed action, makes it a highly satisfying watch. I, for one, am looking forward to the next installment and believe that this franchise still has plenty of rich stories left to tell.
For anyone hesitant because of negative reviews, I encourage you to give The Old Guard 2 a chance. You might find, as I did, that there's much more substance and entertainment here than the critics suggest.
This movie was long slow and completely unnecessary. It dragged through scenes that felt more like filler than actual storytelling and by the time it finally picked up surprise it ended without giving us anything satisfying. Instead of a conclusion we got a forced setup for yet another sequel. No one asked for a third movie and after this one even fewer people will want to watch it. A total letdown. I have no desire to see the next movie. The whole time I was watching this snooze fest I was just waiting for it to end. Bunch of cry baby sad sap of absolutely nothing. You're going to watch it because the first one was actually good. But you will be disappointed. And when you are, come back here and completly slam them with a bad review so they don't waste our time again.