Resurrected
- 2023
- 1h 37m
IMDb RATING
5.3/10
1.8K
YOUR RATING
In a dystopian future, the Vatican knows how to resurrect people. A priest discovers a conspiracy behind the resurrections and their possible link to a series of murders.In a dystopian future, the Vatican knows how to resurrect people. A priest discovers a conspiracy behind the resurrections and their possible link to a series of murders.In a dystopian future, the Vatican knows how to resurrect people. A priest discovers a conspiracy behind the resurrections and their possible link to a series of murders.
Michael Villar
- Frank Collins
- (as Michael Javier Villar)
Maryna Bennett
- Rose Patterson
- (as a different name)
Ahmed Mawas
- Sayid Aboud
- (as Ahmed El-Mawas)
Carolyn Alise
- Anna
- (as Carolyn A'Lise)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I'm not even 15 minutes into it and I'm completely distracted by the grease pit that is the mother's hair. Whoever was in charge of costuming, why would they think that that was a good look for her. It's distracting and dirty, looking in literally every scene so far. Really really really gross.
I'm not even 15 minutes into it and I'm completely distracted by the grease pit that is the mother's hair. Whoever was in charge of costuming, why would they think that that was a good look for her. It's distracting and dirty, looking in literally every scene so far. Really really really gross.
Realy really really gross.
I'm not even 15 minutes into it and I'm completely distracted by the grease pit that is the mother's hair. Whoever was in charge of costuming, why would they think that that was a good look for her. It's distracting and dirty, looking in literally every scene so far. Really really really gross.
Realy really really gross.
I was really surprised to see how good this movie turned out to be, seeing as it is so lowly considered here on IMDB.
The movie deserves a much higher rating being that it has such an original story, solid writing, acting, pacing, and follow-through from beginning to end.
Joe Rechtman does a fantastic job, and it's enjoyable from beginning to end.
I found the immediate premise interesting and something significant to most people, which is what happens after death, and what could happen if we were able to resurrect, and all the complexities that go along with it.
The pitfalls, the power, the problems, and the promise of second chances.
The movie deserves a much higher rating being that it has such an original story, solid writing, acting, pacing, and follow-through from beginning to end.
Joe Rechtman does a fantastic job, and it's enjoyable from beginning to end.
I found the immediate premise interesting and something significant to most people, which is what happens after death, and what could happen if we were able to resurrect, and all the complexities that go along with it.
The pitfalls, the power, the problems, and the promise of second chances.
No, it's not revolutionary or even 'good', but it IS okay if found footage is your thing and you've run out. The premise is actually interesting, it would make a good big budget movie/or a series! (maybe there is already one, maybe I've missed it?)
But would I watch this again? No.
Would I recommend it? For one viewing yes, if this type of movie is your thing.
Will you miss anything by skipping this movie? Not really, but again, interesting premise!
I feel like the actors did fine with what they had. The face time filming thing wasn't terribly done for what it was, it can usually be worse! It was cleanly made and not a nightmare to get through. I actually cared about the main character.
So over all, not too bad, but I don't think I'd have the free time to spend rewatching this in the face of other films.
But would I watch this again? No.
Would I recommend it? For one viewing yes, if this type of movie is your thing.
Will you miss anything by skipping this movie? Not really, but again, interesting premise!
I feel like the actors did fine with what they had. The face time filming thing wasn't terribly done for what it was, it can usually be worse! It was cleanly made and not a nightmare to get through. I actually cared about the main character.
So over all, not too bad, but I don't think I'd have the free time to spend rewatching this in the face of other films.
Yes, it is a webcam- and chat-based movie. Which makes me wonder how well packed it is with action, that keeps you edge-seated. One third of the time are action scenes, shot again on webcams of all kinds.
Poster on IMDB page contains the poorest possible screenshot from the movie, please just disregard it. You may have your answer why this exact 3D is so rubbish when you watch the movie.
Key strength is a script. It's hard not to give away any detail, let's say the story contains ethical questions around religion, conspiracy theory, and several solid twists. Couple of gory scenes. No horror at all to my personal standards. Performances are better than one would expect.
My only criticism would be around final scenes, when it all breaks loose.. those could have been more.. spectacular, but I believe this is owing to budget limitations only.
Btw, don't skip final titles, the story is continued there.
Poster on IMDB page contains the poorest possible screenshot from the movie, please just disregard it. You may have your answer why this exact 3D is so rubbish when you watch the movie.
Key strength is a script. It's hard not to give away any detail, let's say the story contains ethical questions around religion, conspiracy theory, and several solid twists. Couple of gory scenes. No horror at all to my personal standards. Performances are better than one would expect.
My only criticism would be around final scenes, when it all breaks loose.. those could have been more.. spectacular, but I believe this is owing to budget limitations only.
Btw, don't skip final titles, the story is continued there.
I have mixed feelings about this movie. The story could have been something if it was more elaborated towards the end. Now you're left with unanswered questions, not really a positive thing to me. What I didn't like, and it's not the first time I've seen movies shot like that lately, is the whole filming of a computer, going from one social media platform to another, from one call to another, or some googling, and that for the entire movie. Let just keep it at it is boring and looks cheap. I know it's a low budget movie and to be honest it shows. Add to that that I had to watch a German version of this movie where they had all written words in German without subtitles and it got even more annoying. I have some German knowledge but to have to read and translate what is showing on the screen in a movie where 90% of the time it's just like looking at your computer screen, let just say it wasn't a pleasant way to relax and watch a movie. Please just stop filming movies like this, we already spent enough time on our computers, tablets, smartphones etc...
Did you know
- TriviaAll entries contain spoilers
- GoofsJust after Stan subdues Agent Ortiz by slashing her throat, he turns back to his computer and accidentally calls to Rat but says "Cat?"
- ConnectionsReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 967: Here (2024)
- How long is Resurrected?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Возрожденные
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $191,359
- Runtime1 hour 37 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content