Biosphere

There's a lot I like about Biosphere and a lot that didn't fit right for me. The obvious thing that works about this film are it's performances by Sterling K Brown and Mark Duplass. Brown brings a sturdiness to Duplass's humor, creating a great dynamic that is fun to watch and believable. Brown's character Ray provides a grounding to such a serious moment. Duplass's Billy brings the levity necessary to keep two guys in a small dome funny and fresh. Some of the dialog and plot points in this film are absolutely hilarious.

This film has a huge idea and a very small scope to demonstrate it. The choice to skip most of the exposition in how we got here is welcome. I enjoy not being spoon fed the situation, reading clues and attempting to discover what has happened and what will happen is much more satisfying. Throughout the film, I kept wondering "how will they wrap this up?" And they did so by leaving all of the plot points as loose ends which will bother many who watch Biosphere. I didn't mind this choice but the ending left me with a bit of a "then what?" Feeling.

It's hard to review this film without spoilers, but there is so much to the backstory that is never fleshed out, no flashbacks, no additional settings or characters. With such a small scope, some will be very aggrieved at this, others will be content like I was to explore what we do know. This scope hampers the development of place and time but enhances the interest in our two characters and their potential outcomes. The feeling of place in this movie is quite distinct but somewhat empty given our lack of outside knowledge.

Making a film that explores a theory becoming reality is incredibly challenging. Duplass and Brown are able to deliver on this tall, daunting task but it's not great by any stretch.

Greetings again from the darkness. 'Life will find a way.' The iconic line spoken by Jeff Goldblum in JURASSIC PARK (1993) fits right into this offbeat science-fiction film from writer-director Mel Eslyn and co-writer and co-lead actor Mark Duplass. You may not be familiar with indie filmmaker Eslyn, but Duplass has built a career by specializing in projects that rip us out of our comfort zone, and then force us to consider a topic from a new perspective ... as evidenced by films like CYRUS (2010) and CREEP (2014).

The pre-credit opening scenes quickly establish the personalities of Ray (Sterling K Brown) and Billy (Duplass). Ray is a dedicated and serious scientist, while Billy is the former US President (likely inspired by George W Bush). The two are lifelong friends who have been living a few years isolated in the biodome created by Ray. We are to assume these are the final two human survivors on Earth, and we may also assume they are still alive thanks to Ray's ecosystems of fish for protein and plants for nutrients.

Initially, this gives us the appearance of a buddy film as the two men share a morning jog and discuss the dynamics of Mario and Luigi. It's the first of our clues, along with Billy reading "Kiss of the Spider Woman", and the repeated viewings of LETHAL WEAPON. However, the tone shifts pretty quickly with a certain development in the fish habitat. It's best to avoid any further specifics on where the story goes from here, because although there are leaps of faith that must occur by viewers, the core elements raised here are certainly unusual.

A recurring gag about a magic trick with a bowling ball (and its thud), and an ever-present green light in the sky, punctuate the Ray and Billy chats centered on philosophy, gender roles, friendship, masculinity, adaptation, and of course, survival. This is termed a "two-hander" since only two performers make up the entire cast. Sterling K Brown and Mark Duplass are both likable actors and they expertly overcome any shortcomings in the script. And despite those flaws, you'll likely carry on some internal discussions with yourself long after the final drop.

Opening on July 7, 2023.

Ray (Sterling K. Brown) and Billy (Mark Duplass) are best friends and last people on Earth. They survive under a dome built by Ray. They rely on fish farming for food, but the last female fish just died. Eventually, their fishes will run out and so will they. Somehow, life finds a way.

This is an indie from Mel Eslyn and Mark Duplass. It's a two person play and a high concept sci-fi post-apocalyptic flick. It starts with some mildly humorous best friends banter. It turns into an one-joke concept. I would like the premise to have a more specific scientific explanation. I doubt that the film cares that much about that. They are playing this for the comedy. It's awkward. It's uncomfortable. It's cringe comedy and only slightly funny to me.

Biosphere combines romcom and message movie elements with a science fiction plot, with the latter pulling those elements from the genre which serve to support the message by putting characters in a particular situation, as distinguished from scifi that's more rooted in the popular entertainment aspects of the genre. This kind of science fiction drama will appeal to a certain audience if it's well-written from beginning to end. It's relatively uncommon for me to find something that I think is wildly overrated on Letterboxd. Biosphere is an audacious but ultimately unsuccessful film.

The movie is funny in parts, and the acting is very good. It falls short for me in a couple of key areas. First, it's too long for what it's trying to achieve. If it'd been condensed to an hour, it could have been more impactfull. Instead, it delivers exposition too slowly via scenes that are too similar to be anything but repetitive; lingering shots that are supposed to have emotional resonance, but somehow don't; and other scenes that are just longer than necessary.

I also found the score annoying, distracting, and too cute by half, though I'm sure some people will find it quaint or amusing. This shortcoming extends to the film's conclusion, which is like the lame punchline to a joke that took too long to tell.

It's an interesting premise. The strength of this film is the way the setup and characters back stories are disbursed very gradually, a drip at a time, which keeps your attention. In the end though, the set up doesn't really matter a whole lot.

When the main thrust of the narrative becomes clear, rather than running with it and guiding us towards a memorable conclusion, the film chooses to go with blandness, presumably hoping we take the non-committal ending to be open and courageous, and not simply uninspired.

Good performances, good ideas, good direction. The story was just a little too weak for me.