Wild Crime

The third season of Wild Crime is quite strong, with a mix of police work, victims' stories, and the sick killer. The majesty of the parks in Georgia, North Carolina, and Florida are captured to showcase the rugged beauty, isolation, and potential danger. The lasting impact in grieving loved ones and troubled investigators is vivid without being exploitative.

My one quibble is with the "More Victims?" portion of episode four (S3. E4). Rob Endres is allowed to present himself as a grieving widower, as opposed to the main suspect in Patricia's murder that he was. In S1. E2 of Unsolved Mysteries (2020), we learn that Enders locked his step-son out of the house as soon as the wife vanished, although the young man was never a suspect. He would not speak with the step-son about the disappearance, even when the remains were discovered much later.

Enders interview statements are bizarre and incriminating. He shares in creepy detail spending time with the skeletal remains and sleeping with the box of ashes. His statements come close to a confession, as he speculates how a wheelbarrow would be useful to move a body to the woods from the church parking lot. While some similarities with Gary Hilton's murders do exist, it was troubling to see Patricia's likely killer given a free pass. I believe he is guilty, as his words and deeds following his wife's voicing her desire for a divorce are most incriminating. Watch "13 Minutes" and judge for yourself.

I really enjoyed the first season but the second season is even better. Couldn't take my eyes off the screen and wanted to watch the next episode immediately. Very interesting case and they have interviews with all those involved. How they track down the identity from just the remains is fascinating and hats off to those who must have spent countless hours researching the genealogy. Hats off also to all the law enforcement who never gave up. The show has a very high production value, well edited and shot with really well done reenactments and great cinematography of Yosemite valley as well. Hope that there is another season.

Watching this program was a chilling experience, but I learned so much about human nature. The family members and agents that shared their feelings and thoughts sent a signal to all of us to watch out for red flags in the relationships of our loved ones. I think they have helped prevent crimes in the future.

I watched both series of this and loved it! The first series was individual stories, while the second consisting of four episodes, was concentrating one one story.

Imagine going to a beautiful natural park, all around there are mountains, valleys, water. Now add to the mix some with murder on their mind, and it's a recipe for nothing good.

Often the murders in these vast rugged areas are left for decades before even being discovered. Luckily as DNA gets better so dies the chance of finding the killer, and the four episodes of the second series show how scientific advances have moved on.

I'm hoping there might be a further series in time.

The first season of Wild Crimes is about the death of Toni Henthorn. You may have seen this on one or more of the news magazine network shows. This is the most fleshed out portrait of convicted murderer Harold Hawthorn. I recommend this only if a deeper dive is of interest.

The second season episodes of the series Wild Crime keys on a random discovery of a human forearm in Yellowstone Park. After further searching fails to turn up additional evidence park rangers were left with a mystery. Who, when, how, and by whom would be like a puzzle with scant pieces to work with. Time, technology, and many people's long-standing efforts create an amazing journey of twists and turns In the end it is compelling for what was found and the likely way it happened.

With the above said, these 5 episodes play out like a book. By this I mean slow and steady. The high-points would be able to be condesnsed, but then it would just be a crime story. Here the writers and director show all of the principal players in depth. The viewer will feel as if you know these people and the climate of their lives as all intersect. It is crucial to understanding of a murder leaving scant evidence to go on. This crime could have easily remained a big unknown, yet so much eventually fell into place whereby not only the victim is identified, but also a likely scenario of how a particular perpetrator rises to the fore. Adding to this is it most likely can never be positively solved in one crucial aspect of if the most likely suspect actually did it. I like to think, "this was a book worth watching".