Safar Barlek

A Historical Disaster

I've seen a lot of bad television in my time, but this series takes the cake. It's a historical travesty that somehow managed to combine misleading plotlines, glaring inaccuracies, and painfully wooden acting into one catastrophic package.

The show's creators seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of the time period they're attempting to portray. Historical events are twisted into unrecognizable shapes, characters are given motivations that defy logic, and important details are either completely omitted or grossly exaggerated. It's as if they consulted a child's coloring book for their research.

The acting is equally atrocious. The leads are so devoid of charisma that you'd be hard-pressed to remember their names five minutes after watching. They deliver their lines with all the emotion of a cardboard cutout, making it nearly impossible to invest in their stories. The supporting cast isn't much better, with many performances bordering on parody.

But perhaps the most egregious offense is the show's blatant disregard for historical accuracy. The costumes, sets, and props are often laughably inaccurate, and the dialogue is filled with anachronisms that would make a time traveler cringe. It's clear that the creators were more concerned with creating a visually appealing spectacle than with telling a historically accurate story.

In conclusion, this series is a complete waste of time. It's a disrespectful insult to the history it purports to represent, and it's a painful reminder that even talented people can make terrible choices. Avoid it at all costs.

A series that is completely far from historical reality. Fahrettin Pasha and his soldiers are an army that eats locusts to protect the city from starvation and when there are no supplies left for the British invasion. Nowhere in history does it say that he opened fire on civilians. Anyone who wants to can go and research it. The Turkish army showed extraordinary success, resisting for years with zero supplies and protecting the holy lands of the Muslims. Unfortunately, thanks to the British Arabs, the holy lands of the Muslims have fallen into the hands of the British and Jewish puppet Arabs..

The Ottoman Empire's rule over Saudi Arabia began in 1517 with the conquest of Egypt by Yavuz Sultan Selim and lasted until the early 20th century. During this time, Ottoman rule brought about various innovations and changes in Saudi Arabia. Here are some of the important headings: 1. Centralized Administration and Administrative Structure:

The Ottomans established a centralized administrative structure by dividing the different regions of Saudi Arabia into provinces and sanjaks. The Hejaz Region included the holy cities of Mecca and Medina and had a special status.

Local administrators in the region were appointed by the Ottoman sultan, but local tribal leaders and religious authorities also had significant influence.

2. Infrastructure and Transportation:

The Ottomans developed the transportation infrastructure in the region, especially with the Hejaz railway project. The Hejaz Railway, completed in 1908, extended from Damascus to Mecca and facilitated the Hajj journey.

In addition, various projects were carried out to maintain and expand the holy places in Mecca and Medina.

3. Religious and Cultural Protection:

The Ottoman administration undertook the task of protecting and developing the holy places of Islam. Importance was given to the construction of mosques and madrasahs in cities such as Mecca and Medina.

In addition, various measures were taken to ensure that the Hajj ritual was carried out regularly and safely.

4. Trade and Economy:

The Ottomans encouraged trade in Saudi Arabia and controlled trade routes using the region's strategic location on the Red Sea.

Visitors arriving during the Hajj period increased the economic vitality of the region.

5. Security and Public Order:

The Ottomans maintained military units to prevent conflicts between local tribes and to ensure the general security of the region.

In addition, the security of the Hajj routes was of great importance and various measures were taken for this purpose.

These innovations and the influence of the Ottoman administration played an important role in the historical development of Saudi Arabia. However, the Ottomans generally allowed local traditions and structures to continue, respecting the unique socio-cultural dynamics of the region.

Historical documents and sources confirm that Fahrettin Pasha and the Ottoman soldiers under his command put up a great resistance to defend the holy lands against the British and their supporters. While the series "Safar Berlik" addresses the events in the Hejaz region during the late period of the Ottoman Empire, the distortion of these historical events to emphasize Arab nationalism and portray all Arab Muslims as being against the Ottomans is far from historical accuracy. On the contrary, many Arab Muslims, especially the people of Medina and its surroundings, resisted the British alongside the Ottoman army. The presentation of such a narrative in the series creates a misleading perception of history among viewers and oversimplifies the complex historical dynamics of the region. It is common for dramatic productions to approach historical events from a single perspective, but it is important for viewers to research historical facts and seek information from various sources to recognize such distortions.

Hahaha, so the British agent Lawrence saved the Arab people? Such claims are really very interesting and worth questioning. However, in order to understand this story, it is necessary to think more deeply. I have a question: Why would the Ottomans want to attack a people they had been living together with for 500 years? The Ottoman Empire had lived in peace with the people of the Arab geography for centuries and had taken care to protect the social, cultural and religious structures in these regions. So, what reason could the Ottomans have for attacking these people? Moreover, the strategic interests of the Ottoman Empire and the establishment of stability in the region clearly show that such an attack was illogical.

Now, let's come to another important point: Lawrence's role. Lawrence incited the Arab tribes to rebel by inciting them against the Ottomans and promising them that they would establish a state. This was England's use of the Arabs' nationalist feelings to protect and expand its interests in the region. The British used agents like Lawrence to accelerate the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and bring the region under their control. However, during this period, the majority of the Arab people remained loyal to the Ottomans and resisted these provocations of the British. Lawrence's actions can only be considered as an opportunism in a weak moment of the Ottomans and cannot be said to be a real savior for the vast majority of the Arab people. After all, the Ottomans and the Arabs lived together under the same empire for centuries and shared a common history and cultural heritage. Therefore, the claim that the Ottomans attacked their own people does not correspond to historical facts.