The story of immigrants who founded first Hollywood studios.The story of immigrants who founded first Hollywood studios.The story of immigrants who founded first Hollywood studios.
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
There were four Warner brothers, not three. Co-founder Albert is nowhere to be found or even mentioned. It's as if he didn't exist. Albert Warner headed all of Warner Bros. Distribution in New York with my grandfather Samuel Schneider (who was vice president and treasurer on the board). Albert and Sam were the first of the brothers to get into the movie business, before Harry and Jack joined them. A major mistake in this series.
United Artists was founded by four movie icons, not three. In addition to Mary Pickford, Douglas Fairbanks, and Charlie Chaplin, all shown in the series, they entirely left out D. W. Griffith. His career, impact, and legacy are completely gone. No "Birth of a Nation" or "Intolerance." None of his legendary work with Lillian Gish (who is also conspicuously absent). But to spend a good amount of time on the forming of United Artists and not even mention Griffith's name isn't just an error, it's revisionist history. It's just plain wrong.
The budget is low, except apparently for purchasing cartons of cigarettes. The younger actor playing Adolph Zukor was never without a cigarette in any shot or scene. EVER. It went beyond a chain-smoking vice or character trait into completely distracting and amateurish, like a bad joke or exaggerated nervous tick.
I appreciate the effort, and it's a story worth telling, so I'm glad this series exists. Many fascinating people, tales, and details are presented, but with some huge, glaring errors (mentioned above), it makes me doubt and question the truth in all of it.
United Artists was founded by four movie icons, not three. In addition to Mary Pickford, Douglas Fairbanks, and Charlie Chaplin, all shown in the series, they entirely left out D. W. Griffith. His career, impact, and legacy are completely gone. No "Birth of a Nation" or "Intolerance." None of his legendary work with Lillian Gish (who is also conspicuously absent). But to spend a good amount of time on the forming of United Artists and not even mention Griffith's name isn't just an error, it's revisionist history. It's just plain wrong.
The budget is low, except apparently for purchasing cartons of cigarettes. The younger actor playing Adolph Zukor was never without a cigarette in any shot or scene. EVER. It went beyond a chain-smoking vice or character trait into completely distracting and amateurish, like a bad joke or exaggerated nervous tick.
I appreciate the effort, and it's a story worth telling, so I'm glad this series exists. Many fascinating people, tales, and details are presented, but with some huge, glaring errors (mentioned above), it makes me doubt and question the truth in all of it.
As far too many reviewers have noted, the acting is mediocre at best. No one is going to win an Oscar or Emmy for their acting here (although I don't think it's nearly as terrible as many seem to think).
But, if you're focussed on how good (or bad...) the acting is, you're going to miss out on what this series really is: History.
As a historical account of Hollywood and the major studios and stars, it's excellent.
Ignore the acting quality, focus on the history, and you'll appreciate this series more.
But, if you're focussed on how good (or bad...) the acting is, you're going to miss out on what this series really is: History.
As a historical account of Hollywood and the major studios and stars, it's excellent.
Ignore the acting quality, focus on the history, and you'll appreciate this series more.
I always enjoy learning about the early days of Hollywood. And I'll have to admit I did learn a few things I didn't know. But I'm taking it all with a grain of salt. Things like... United Artist was formed by 3 principals? Pickford, Chaplin, Fairbanks? What about D. W. Griffith? Zukor, Lasky but no mention of C. B DeMille? I'm left thinking the producers did this because... they couldn't afford any more actors. How many shots of actors walking down a path, actors talking at a table, Zukor lighting another cigarette. Good grief he would have been dead at 25 given how many times he's seen lighting up. As I say, I have enjoyed it but I do cringe every time I see the same set, an actor walking down a path and "thinking", actors at a table talking, the same shot of the narrator "Zukor" . Can't we vary that shot just a little? Oh well I guess that's the way they made films in the "early" days.
As a life long cinephile I will watch anything related to the history of the movies.
For the most part, I enjoyed this, particularly the stuff with Carl Lemmle and Universal, but to not mention D. W. Griffith even once, (not even as of the four creators of United Artist) is just weird. Not to mention paring down the Warner Brothers from 4 to only 3.
I'm also not sure how "Tess of the Storm Country" (1922) could ever be considered the first feature film, when "Les Miserables", "Cabiria", and of Course, "Birth of A Nation" (1915) all precede it by many years.
But overall there is more good than bad and still worth a watch for film buffs.
For the most part, I enjoyed this, particularly the stuff with Carl Lemmle and Universal, but to not mention D. W. Griffith even once, (not even as of the four creators of United Artist) is just weird. Not to mention paring down the Warner Brothers from 4 to only 3.
I'm also not sure how "Tess of the Storm Country" (1922) could ever be considered the first feature film, when "Les Miserables", "Cabiria", and of Course, "Birth of A Nation" (1915) all precede it by many years.
But overall there is more good than bad and still worth a watch for film buffs.
This series fulfilled it's purpose -an overall view into the studio heads who created Hollywood. And it did that by putting the true life events front and center, not the serie's sets, the wardrobe, and characters' acting skills.
My husband, who is not a film buff, was totally intrigued, especially by the genius and skills of Mary Pickford. Besides mastering acting, writing and producing, Mary managed United Artists studios, too. Fascinating woman.
My husband, who is not a film buff, was totally intrigued, especially by the genius and skills of Mary Pickford. Besides mastering acting, writing and producing, Mary managed United Artists studios, too. Fascinating woman.
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Hollywood - Aufstieg der Titanen
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content