Pandemonium

I'm not usually one to write reviews, but I felt like I had to for this movie. The script was really well done from start to finish. I wouldn't call it a horror movie because it had so many realistic elements; it felt more like a spiritual journey we hope never to experience ourselves. The music and sounds added a scary element to the whole movie. I had to rewatch a few scenes to get a clear picture of what was happening, and I didn't regret doing so. Even though the movie is French, it captivated me from beginning to end. It's definitely worth watching, and I'll leave it at that so you can be surprised too.

Pandemonium (2023, France), at face-value presents three ostensibly loose standing stories which all lead to almost everyone, fairly or unfairly, ending up in hell and going through a Dantesque process of suffering.

At this level the story engages questions around the moral values, if any, of those who "judge" humanity and as such the potential irrelevance of human existentialism.

There is also space for interpreting the film. An example of this flows mainly from the final aspect around the reincarnation of the Anti-Christ and the immediately preceding remarks around time being a human construct and not being linear. In each story we experience loss by the protagonist of family members in different ways, but there is always loss and there is always either direct or indirect guilt on the side of the protagonist. The argument for the stories thus dealing with reincarnation is not totally far-fetched and provides a solid thread to combine the stories into one larger story.

The cinematography was clearly influenced by writer and director Alexandre Claudin (Quarxx)'s artistic and atmospheric intent, inter alia demonstrated through the homage paid to various genres of horror films through the three stories.

The acting, especially by (at the time) ten year old Manon Maindevide, was top notch. The writing left obvious lacunae in the individual stories as well as the connecting story. Some might see this as a weakness in the film but it served an obvious purpose , both in relation to the main theme of existentialism / life-death-afterlife and the meaning (if any) thereof, as well as how the viewer gets his or her head around this theme, i.e. Through personal interpretation. Definitely a very unique film. 9/10.

Heaven and hell truly exist. You see a glimpse of the later one while watching this movie. And it's definitely the place where the writer/director will end up... I rarely write reviews, but when having watched an extraordinary movies I make an exception every now and then. This is is such a time and the reason is clearly not positive. The movie earns its one star because of an idea of the afterlife it tries to present. But that's it. The resulting plot lacks a lot of logic (which the director tries to explain at first, but then gets weirder with every additional episode every passing minute). The missing visual effects (one CGI - I don't count the static doors in the landscape as such - and three latex face masks are not enough) and slow-acting actors with long-winding dialogues (and not describing anything despite it) give the movie the rest.

Maybe: if you watch it nevertheless, you could place this lost half and a hour of lifetime on your judgement day as good deed for self-abandonment...

I have to give the film credit for having a unique base setting to an anthology-based horror film.

There isn't much of a review here, since the film is flat and immensely mundane. It isn't terrible.

The CGI is kind of cheesy in the beginning, but nevertheless the demons and the films description of Hell are very "awesome" (for lack of better terminology).

Some of the stories are original, but are lacking in story depth, and they come off as mundane. I would categorize this film to be put into the supernatural horror genre, but that is just my opinion.

The stories themselves are not "scary" or "creepy/dark" as some may say but are intriguing in their own sort of way. On the contrary, the stories are quite boring.

I believe that the best aesthetic portions of the film are in the beginning and in "Hell." Otherwise, the film is rather mediocre.

I think it would be worth a one-time watch.

5/10.

After a devastating car accident, several survivors get up from the wreckage only to realize they are involved in an existential crisis over their past indiscretions coming back to haunt them, and after learning of the fates of several others like them must find a way to deal with their situation.

This was a highly disappointing and pretty underwhelming genre effort. The only aspect that really works well here is the initial setup and how it all starts which manages to bring about a highly effective use of chilling imagery to figure out what's going on. The whole idea of the characters being stuck in the afterlife with no idea themselves comes about rather well and the moody location offers the kind of intriguing starting point that gets this going on a high note. As well, with the way the films' approach to things includes a well-worn treatise on grief and the processing of trauma the way he comes across the other individuals who are stuck there like they are manages to be a highly effective setup that discusses the nature of sin in such a way as to be quite impressive overall. Beyond that, though, there's not a whole lot to say about this one since the structure of what's going on isn't all that enjoyable. This is due to the anthology structure present which makes very little sense for how it's incorporated. The inclusion in the middle of the film with very little warning that isn't that interesting beyond a one-note setup makes for some cliched stereotype setpieces to come about while only dealing with some rather bland and pedestrian themes. That they take up so much of the running time in the middle of the film offers up the kind of non-genre guilt trip that these stories are based on that it feels so shoehorned into this with the story of the murderous child being so confusing with where it takes place and how it all comes together with the imaginary friend that it's hard to enjoy it while the second story is barely genre-related at all about the bullied teen with so much of it about the mother's guilt for what happened. These aren't that interesting to watch and really just turn this off overall.

Rated Unrated/R: Graphic Violence and Graphic Language.