A cursed Witchboard awakens dark forces, dragging a young couple into a deadly game of possession and deceptionA cursed Witchboard awakens dark forces, dragging a young couple into a deadly game of possession and deceptionA cursed Witchboard awakens dark forces, dragging a young couple into a deadly game of possession and deception
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Mel Jarnson
- Brooke
- (as Melanie Jarnson)
Victoria Grosselfuenger
- Sierra
- (as Victoria Rose Grosselfuenger)
Jamal Azémar
- Zack
- (as a different name)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
5.12.4K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Oof
I can't think of anything nice to say about this movie. The CGI is pretty scary, though. Scary bad. Instagram filter level of special effects. Dialogue that 1st year film students would be embarrassed to turn in as homework. Flashbacks so silly that they feel like comedy. Zero tension and not a single tiny little scare. Apocalyptical nonsense of freaky Friday proportions.
Stylistic But Uneventful
Stylistic remake of the camp 1980's horror, Witchboard is very competently (maybe too much so) from Chuck Russell, and the performances are better than the standard horror fare. The screenplay though is dire, a little tasteless and a lot of missed opportunities. A little more uneventful than it aspires to be.
A pleasant surprise
As someone who counts themselves a fan of the big-haired Tawny Kitaen-led 1986 original "Witchboard," I was not particularly enthused by the promotional material for this remake, but I felt a duty to give it a chance, especially given Chuck Russell's horror credentials. I will preface this by saying that I went into this with extremely low expectations. Is this remake high art? Absolutely not. But for sheer entertainment value, I was pleasantly surprised.
The story here takes the bare bones of the original film (with a few visual nods and recreations of scenes from the source material), setting it in present-day New Orleans where a young woman, Emily, crosses paths with a historic "pendulum board." As she and her chef fiancé prepare to open his new restaurant, Emily becomes overtaken by the board which possesses supernatural powers.
While the original film was not exactly known for its subtlety, Russell's reimagining is outwardly garish and plays with a lot of familiar witchcraft tropes and cliches in a manner that may cause some eye-rolling, though the handling of the material was less outrageous in some aspects than I anticipated. The screenplay is far from perfect, though, despite some trite dialogue here and there, I felt the story moved forward at a breezy pace. The history of the board itself and its association with a powerful witch takes center stage here, drawing us back to 17th-century France in a timeline-shifting plot thread that allows for some surprisingly well-orchestrated period set pieces. There is also a unique theme at play revolving around the history of Christian institutions surreptitiously co-opting and dabbling in the very dark arts they purport to condemn, something you rarely see explored in films of this type. These sequences are well-staged and at times reminded me of the period Hammer films of the 1960s and 1970s.
The performances here are decent given the material, with Madison Iseman giving the strongest turn in the film as the troubled Emily. Iseman evokes a natural guilelessness that is appealing, while also managing to strike the appropriate sinister chords as she literally loses possession of herself. Jamie Campbell Bower plays an occultist/New Age pagan with a vested interest in the board, and his performance is stagy if not amusing. Where the film suffers I think is its overzealous use of digital special effects, which give it a rather silly visual flair that recalls the cheapjack direct-to-video supernatural fodder of the 1990s. Whether this throwback element is intentional or not is difficult to say, though I believe the film would have been much better off without it. Still, there does remain a novelty aspect to seeing something of this nature on the big screen in 2025--and to be honest, it is perhaps not more egregious than a good deal of what we see studios like Blumhouse churning out year after year.
An amusing dinner sequence leads into a finale that is staged quite goofily to say the least, and there is a denouement that is equally goofy despite hearkening back to the aforementioned theme of religious institutions' interests in (and ostensible adoption of) the occult. At face value, the entire thing is admittedly ridiculous, but I can say that I was very much entertained by this film. I went into it with the expectation that it would be a chore to sit through, but I did not have that experience. While it is flawed, I think it is ultimately a decent if not campy reimagining of the original story. To think that a B-movie like this could claw its way to theaters today is a bit of a shock--what's more shocking to me, though, is that, despite being a fairly jaded horror fan, I found it an extremely watchable and reasonably entertaining popcorn movie. Check your expectations at the door and you may have the same result. 7/10.
The story here takes the bare bones of the original film (with a few visual nods and recreations of scenes from the source material), setting it in present-day New Orleans where a young woman, Emily, crosses paths with a historic "pendulum board." As she and her chef fiancé prepare to open his new restaurant, Emily becomes overtaken by the board which possesses supernatural powers.
While the original film was not exactly known for its subtlety, Russell's reimagining is outwardly garish and plays with a lot of familiar witchcraft tropes and cliches in a manner that may cause some eye-rolling, though the handling of the material was less outrageous in some aspects than I anticipated. The screenplay is far from perfect, though, despite some trite dialogue here and there, I felt the story moved forward at a breezy pace. The history of the board itself and its association with a powerful witch takes center stage here, drawing us back to 17th-century France in a timeline-shifting plot thread that allows for some surprisingly well-orchestrated period set pieces. There is also a unique theme at play revolving around the history of Christian institutions surreptitiously co-opting and dabbling in the very dark arts they purport to condemn, something you rarely see explored in films of this type. These sequences are well-staged and at times reminded me of the period Hammer films of the 1960s and 1970s.
The performances here are decent given the material, with Madison Iseman giving the strongest turn in the film as the troubled Emily. Iseman evokes a natural guilelessness that is appealing, while also managing to strike the appropriate sinister chords as she literally loses possession of herself. Jamie Campbell Bower plays an occultist/New Age pagan with a vested interest in the board, and his performance is stagy if not amusing. Where the film suffers I think is its overzealous use of digital special effects, which give it a rather silly visual flair that recalls the cheapjack direct-to-video supernatural fodder of the 1990s. Whether this throwback element is intentional or not is difficult to say, though I believe the film would have been much better off without it. Still, there does remain a novelty aspect to seeing something of this nature on the big screen in 2025--and to be honest, it is perhaps not more egregious than a good deal of what we see studios like Blumhouse churning out year after year.
An amusing dinner sequence leads into a finale that is staged quite goofily to say the least, and there is a denouement that is equally goofy despite hearkening back to the aforementioned theme of religious institutions' interests in (and ostensible adoption of) the occult. At face value, the entire thing is admittedly ridiculous, but I can say that I was very much entertained by this film. I went into it with the expectation that it would be a chore to sit through, but I did not have that experience. While it is flawed, I think it is ultimately a decent if not campy reimagining of the original story. To think that a B-movie like this could claw its way to theaters today is a bit of a shock--what's more shocking to me, though, is that, despite being a fairly jaded horror fan, I found it an extremely watchable and reasonably entertaining popcorn movie. Check your expectations at the door and you may have the same result. 7/10.
I thought the reviews are fake
First of all, I took a risk and watched this movie which has low number of reviews. So, I thought they are fake, just marketing the movie.
I dont know if they are real but I can say that my review is real.
I like the movie, it has several stages, it has characters, backstories, etc. It is not something very easy. I must say that execution of such a production is difficult and you can easily mess it up.
The stuff that I dont like is that this remake needs another remake, because this one has bad cgi effects, also a bit charicarure like villian. I would strongly suggest another future director to make it not a B movie. I suggest the design of the witchboard should be changed to something not looking like a grotesque toy. Some artists can work on that some with vision and talent. Then it can be more scary, also instead of swedish look alike villians, gor for something else.
Also, the ending is a bit weird but I am not gonna spoil it here.
I would call this movie as a hidden gen, I will now watch the original as well.
I dont know if they are real but I can say that my review is real.
I like the movie, it has several stages, it has characters, backstories, etc. It is not something very easy. I must say that execution of such a production is difficult and you can easily mess it up.
The stuff that I dont like is that this remake needs another remake, because this one has bad cgi effects, also a bit charicarure like villian. I would strongly suggest another future director to make it not a B movie. I suggest the design of the witchboard should be changed to something not looking like a grotesque toy. Some artists can work on that some with vision and talent. Then it can be more scary, also instead of swedish look alike villians, gor for something else.
Also, the ending is a bit weird but I am not gonna spoil it here.
I would call this movie as a hidden gen, I will now watch the original as well.
It's Very Watchable. I Enjoyed It.
I haven't seen the original, so this review is solely based on this movie alone and not distracted by any comparisons to the earlier version. After reading the bad reviews, I was completely put off by them, but there were a couple that gave it higher ratings that seemed genuine, so I gave it a go (with very low expectations). I wasn't disappointed.
The minor downsides (there were no major ones) were the special effects and perhaps some of the acting, though nothing was standout bad, and besides, it's a low-budget B-movie, so what do you really expect?
I will add that the third act of the movie kind of went outside of the comfortable ballpark I had gotten accustomed to and embarked on a new direction, like a key change in a song. Here, up to the end, some of the action sequences (one in particular) left me cringing a bit, but as the rest of the movie had been pretty strong, I overlooked them. And for me, it had a reasonably satisfying conclusion (except for one thing, but that would be a spoiler).
Overall, I understand the low ratings from some people, but I watched this from start to finish in one sitting, and I didn't get bored or irritated once. I would happily watch it again with someone who hadn't seen it before.
The minor downsides (there were no major ones) were the special effects and perhaps some of the acting, though nothing was standout bad, and besides, it's a low-budget B-movie, so what do you really expect?
I will add that the third act of the movie kind of went outside of the comfortable ballpark I had gotten accustomed to and embarked on a new direction, like a key change in a song. Here, up to the end, some of the action sequences (one in particular) left me cringing a bit, but as the rest of the movie had been pretty strong, I overlooked them. And for me, it had a reasonably satisfying conclusion (except for one thing, but that would be a spoiler).
Overall, I understand the low ratings from some people, but I watched this from start to finish in one sitting, and I didn't get bored or irritated once. I would happily watch it again with someone who hadn't seen it before.
The Best New and Upcoming Horror
The Best New and Upcoming Horror
Sinister sequels, eerie indies, and blockbuster boo-fests — here are the most exciting horror movies and shows to add to your Watchlist.
Did you know
- TriviaDirector, Chuck Russell, sought to cast Jamie Campbell Bower, after seeing him as Vecna in "Stranger Things" (2016-2025).
- GoofsSeveral characters refer to "ancient Wicca" or call Wicca an ancient religion. Wicca is a modern practice that was created in the mid 20th century.
- ConnectionsRemake of Witchboard (1986)
- SoundtracksNothing But A Party
written by Jeff Ford & Mike Esneault
published by: First Digital Music
courtesy of: Universal Production Music
- How long is Witchboard?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $269,300
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $174,500
- Aug 17, 2025
- Gross worldwide
- $500,798
- Runtime
- 1h 52m(112 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content





