In 2030 Milan, an undercover agent for the global spy agency Citadel is trapped behind enemy lines as a mole in the powerful enemy syndicate Manticore.In 2030 Milan, an undercover agent for the global spy agency Citadel is trapped behind enemy lines as a mole in the powerful enemy syndicate Manticore.In 2030 Milan, an undercover agent for the global spy agency Citadel is trapped behind enemy lines as a mole in the powerful enemy syndicate Manticore.
Browse episodes
Summary
Reviewers say 'Citadel: Diana' has mixed reception with praise for Matilda De Angelis' performance and action scenes. The international direction and Italian setting are appreciated. However, criticisms include a convoluted plot, lack of character development, and poor writing. Many find the series formulaic with predictable tropes and lackluster action. Dubbing and lip-sync issues are noted, alongside distractions from the main character's hairstyle. While some find it entertaining, others consider it a disappointing addition to the 'Citadel' franchise.
Featured reviews
Jobs.
While Citadel: Diana had the potential to be a captivating international thriller, it falls totally flat in almost every aspect - except for Matilda. This feels like a low-budget series from the '90s. The storyline feels recycled, lacking any depth and complexity- unlike the first season. The pacing is uneven, with predictable twists that don't land anywhere. The show struggles to create meaningful tension or character development. The Amazon executives who approved these scripts should consider changing jobs.
Matilda, however, is the standout. She is the ONLY reason to keep watching the entire episodes which are painful to watch. She has a natural screen presence that captivates, and it's clear she's destined for greater roles. Hopefully, we'll see her in a major U. S. production soon, where her talent can truly shine.
In the end, while Citadel: Diana may not live up to expectations, it's worth watching just for Matilda- an amazing talent.
While Citadel: Diana had the potential to be a captivating international thriller, it falls totally flat in almost every aspect - except for Matilda. This feels like a low-budget series from the '90s. The storyline feels recycled, lacking any depth and complexity- unlike the first season. The pacing is uneven, with predictable twists that don't land anywhere. The show struggles to create meaningful tension or character development. The Amazon executives who approved these scripts should consider changing jobs.
Matilda, however, is the standout. She is the ONLY reason to keep watching the entire episodes which are painful to watch. She has a natural screen presence that captivates, and it's clear she's destined for greater roles. Hopefully, we'll see her in a major U. S. production soon, where her talent can truly shine.
In the end, while Citadel: Diana may not live up to expectations, it's worth watching just for Matilda- an amazing talent.
Wow! This was a terrible waste of time on a holiday weekend. But, I really should have managed my expectations better since the first "Citadel" disappointed--after a very good pilot episode.
Anyway, "Diana" is greatly hampered by constant back-and-forth between time, and so-so action sequences. The worst thing, though, is that the series doesn't know how to TELL a story. There's no character development, motivation beyond the very superficial. The actors are all Italians--and not really well known in the U. S.
The Italian locations are great to look at, but the convoluted story undercuts everything.
Given two strikes, I'm not sure I'm going to watch the next "Citadel" installment that premieres in early November.
Anyway, "Diana" is greatly hampered by constant back-and-forth between time, and so-so action sequences. The worst thing, though, is that the series doesn't know how to TELL a story. There's no character development, motivation beyond the very superficial. The actors are all Italians--and not really well known in the U. S.
The Italian locations are great to look at, but the convoluted story undercuts everything.
Given two strikes, I'm not sure I'm going to watch the next "Citadel" installment that premieres in early November.
Maybe it is not a great history or a great production. I did not expected it to be, and I am not knowledgeable enough to be a critic. I have enjoyed a few hours of an action/ scifi/ spy tv show, and, not the least, the beautiful Matilda de Angelis.
I agree with the reviewer that one should watch and make their own judgment. It should not be a problem being in Italian, or centered in Italy, or using very long guns, or the tech that would make a secret cafe conversations impossible (unless they also have a tech to cover the conversation, which I believe is a reasonable expectation).
I do have an issue with picturing cold assassins as heroes. A more realistic character development would improve the show. But that is just me.
I agree with the reviewer that one should watch and make their own judgment. It should not be a problem being in Italian, or centered in Italy, or using very long guns, or the tech that would make a secret cafe conversations impossible (unless they also have a tech to cover the conversation, which I believe is a reasonable expectation).
I do have an issue with picturing cold assassins as heroes. A more realistic character development would improve the show. But that is just me.
Better than the big budget English language take which is uneven; tries too hard. I quit that show after two to three episodes.
On the contrary this series grows on you, drawing you in, after two episodes.
This Italian version is smoother, less cluttered. It holds a consistent style than the bigger production USA series. It has neat special effects like the weaponry that don't dominate the story line.
The series relies on effective dialogue, tension & intrigue.
The two lead actors hold their own. The film pulls off the storyline without a huge budget with effective production.
The show grows on you as entertaining sci-fi. It a fun, diversion; binge-able.
On the contrary this series grows on you, drawing you in, after two episodes.
This Italian version is smoother, less cluttered. It holds a consistent style than the bigger production USA series. It has neat special effects like the weaponry that don't dominate the story line.
The series relies on effective dialogue, tension & intrigue.
The two lead actors hold their own. The film pulls off the storyline without a huge budget with effective production.
The show grows on you as entertaining sci-fi. It a fun, diversion; binge-able.
Another unnecessary spin-off/show that relies on an unoriginal spy plot, stock characters, tropes, and cliffhangers, with the same a-young-protagonist-with-dead-parents-pretty-enough-to-be-mentored-to-seek-revenge story reminiscent of even better works such as the Hanna movie (not so much the TV Show).
I'm still unsure why this franchise from the Russo Brothers was pitched as a "global sci-fi event series," as it offers little that feels fresh or innovative. However, it might work for a one-day binge since it only has six episodes. The action sequences are also somewhat decent, and Matilda De Angelis delivers a semi-sold performance.
I'm still unsure why this franchise from the Russo Brothers was pitched as a "global sci-fi event series," as it offers little that feels fresh or innovative. However, it might work for a one-day binge since it only has six episodes. The action sequences are also somewhat decent, and Matilda De Angelis delivers a semi-sold performance.
Did you know
- TriviaItalian installment of the Russo Brothers' global thriller/spy event series Citadel (2023).
- ConnectionsSpin-off from Citadel (2023)
- How many seasons does Citadel: Diana have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime50 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content