Based on the story of the Mitford sisters, six sisters who refused to play by the rules and whose often-scandalous lives made headlines around the world. Set in the 1930s, it is a tale of be... Read allBased on the story of the Mitford sisters, six sisters who refused to play by the rules and whose often-scandalous lives made headlines around the world. Set in the 1930s, it is a tale of betrayal, scandal, heartache and even imprisonment.Based on the story of the Mitford sisters, six sisters who refused to play by the rules and whose often-scandalous lives made headlines around the world. Set in the 1930s, it is a tale of betrayal, scandal, heartache and even imprisonment.
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
Let me get one thing out of the way first. They can never get the hairstyles right in these period pieces. I read once that art evaluators always look at the hair first when trying to see if a painting is fake; counterfeiters just can't get it right. Nor can modern hairstylists. The sisters' hair was completely anomalous.
And now, why was it sanitised? Nancy, who narrated the series was cast as a wise elder sister on good terms with all of her siblings to begin with. In fact she bullied them terribly, even into adulthood with a waspish wit and sarcasm.
Tom was a fascist but portrayed as a good egg in the series; he even refused to fight against Germany.
Muv was a fascist in real life. So deep were her leanings that she separated from Farve because of his patriotism for the UK. Yet in the series she's portrayed as a gentle, mother goddess with no political views, indeed, if anything, shocked at the doings of her two fascist and Nazi daughters.
Pam was a virulent anti-Semite who stated, along with her husband, on many occasions that all Jews should be killed. Yet she's portrayed as a jolly hockey sticks hoyden and a sympathetic character.
Unity was a Nazi and that was made clear in the show. But for goodness sake! They brought modern psychology into it. The actress playing her had clearly been directed to play her as neurodivergent.
Jessica and Diana seemed to be the only ones who were, more or less, true to life.
Someone of my age and generation would know about this family from parents, newspapers, Nancy's novels and Jessica's work. They were a pretty gruesome bunch. Perhaps historical accuracy would have made the series far too depressing.
As it was, I watched the lot in 24 hours. I enjoyed it but I felt disappointed and had a sense that an opportunity was missed. I am nonetheless looking forward to the second season.
A bit of a mixed review, I'm afraid. I'd say watch it but with no great expectations.
And now, why was it sanitised? Nancy, who narrated the series was cast as a wise elder sister on good terms with all of her siblings to begin with. In fact she bullied them terribly, even into adulthood with a waspish wit and sarcasm.
Tom was a fascist but portrayed as a good egg in the series; he even refused to fight against Germany.
Muv was a fascist in real life. So deep were her leanings that she separated from Farve because of his patriotism for the UK. Yet in the series she's portrayed as a gentle, mother goddess with no political views, indeed, if anything, shocked at the doings of her two fascist and Nazi daughters.
Pam was a virulent anti-Semite who stated, along with her husband, on many occasions that all Jews should be killed. Yet she's portrayed as a jolly hockey sticks hoyden and a sympathetic character.
Unity was a Nazi and that was made clear in the show. But for goodness sake! They brought modern psychology into it. The actress playing her had clearly been directed to play her as neurodivergent.
Jessica and Diana seemed to be the only ones who were, more or less, true to life.
Someone of my age and generation would know about this family from parents, newspapers, Nancy's novels and Jessica's work. They were a pretty gruesome bunch. Perhaps historical accuracy would have made the series far too depressing.
As it was, I watched the lot in 24 hours. I enjoyed it but I felt disappointed and had a sense that an opportunity was missed. I am nonetheless looking forward to the second season.
A bit of a mixed review, I'm afraid. I'd say watch it but with no great expectations.
Outrageous is a long-overdue dramatisation of the Mitford sisters, bringing to life one of the most extraordinary and divisive families in 20th-century Britain. Set against the backdrop of a country on the brink of war, the show cleverly frames the story through Nancy's eyes, allowing for a rich, intimate view of the family's tangled dynamics rather than a dry historical checklist. The acting and casting are superb, each sister is pitch-perfect, capturing their eccentricities and contradictions with warmth, sharpness and real emotional weight. Even moments I thought I knew surprised me in performance. My only complaint is that we don't have a second series yet. It's brilliantly addictive, almost impossible not to binge in one go.
I have been fascinated by the Mitford sisters for some time. So it was good to see the characters fleshed out in a drama.
The story really centres around Nancy, Diana, Unity and the parents. The other sisters and brothers are bit players in the story. And as such it's hard to grasp who's who in the initial episodes.
All the actors do a great job and it looks great. The background of political turmoil in England and on the Continent which leads to conflict within the sisterhood is a major part of the storyline. Told through the eyes of Nancy, the narrative is clearly defined.
Although to most people these actresses sound posh. The real Mitfords were part of the Englush upper class. I recently saw an interview with Diana. She made these actresses sound like washer women.
The story really centres around Nancy, Diana, Unity and the parents. The other sisters and brothers are bit players in the story. And as such it's hard to grasp who's who in the initial episodes.
All the actors do a great job and it looks great. The background of political turmoil in England and on the Continent which leads to conflict within the sisterhood is a major part of the storyline. Told through the eyes of Nancy, the narrative is clearly defined.
Although to most people these actresses sound posh. The real Mitfords were part of the Englush upper class. I recently saw an interview with Diana. She made these actresses sound like washer women.
This drama portrays life in the 1930s of the extraordinary Mitford family.
In fact it could have been called Extraordinary rather than Outrageous.
The protagonist is Nancy Mitford who became an established author.
The telling of their lives underlines just how autobiographical Nancy's most famous publications really are, The Pursuit of Love and Love in a Cold Climate.
Their pursuit of love wasn't really love at all, it was the pursuit of an eligible men with an income that would keep the Mitford sisters in the style of life to which they were accustomed.
As such, in the 1930s, they had very little to offer and their whole existence seemed to be aimed at "coming out" or presented to society at the annual debutants ball.
Very shallow indeed, but these were not ordinary women they held very strong views not always in alignment with one another, so much so that Unity and Diana finding themselves embroiled in Fascism.
Anyway, it is a good drama and is enhanced with a mainly unfamiliar cast. Only Anna Chancellor, as the mother, being instantly recognizable.
In fact it could have been called Extraordinary rather than Outrageous.
The protagonist is Nancy Mitford who became an established author.
The telling of their lives underlines just how autobiographical Nancy's most famous publications really are, The Pursuit of Love and Love in a Cold Climate.
Their pursuit of love wasn't really love at all, it was the pursuit of an eligible men with an income that would keep the Mitford sisters in the style of life to which they were accustomed.
As such, in the 1930s, they had very little to offer and their whole existence seemed to be aimed at "coming out" or presented to society at the annual debutants ball.
Very shallow indeed, but these were not ordinary women they held very strong views not always in alignment with one another, so much so that Unity and Diana finding themselves embroiled in Fascism.
Anyway, it is a good drama and is enhanced with a mainly unfamiliar cast. Only Anna Chancellor, as the mother, being instantly recognizable.
The Mitfords are one of, if not THE, most interesting families of the 20th century, so l've been waiting for this biopic for some time, even though much has been used in Nancy's biographic novels 'The Pursuit of Love' and 'Love in a Cold Climate', both of which have been adapted for television several times. Their story is seen through the eyes of the eldest Mitford, Nancy, the author and although the sisters bear no physical resemblance to the reality (that would be hoping for too much) the characters are fairly well defined, if a little bland in some cases. My grandfather met Nancy when a Bright Young Thing and took her to a party. I don't know what he would have made of this. What is missing is the distinctive Mitford drawl, which you can hear in interviews, obviously toned down for modern 'Estuary English' audiences. What redeems this series however is the love the sisters have for each other, even though often diametrically opposed to each other.
Did you know
- TriviaBessie Carter who plays Nancy Mitford said she has "been weirdly connected to Nancy for ages." Carter performed the audio-book narration for Mitford's The Pursuit of Love and researched the author during the process. She learned Mitford worked at St Mary's Hospital during the war, the hospital where Carter herself was born and Mitford's house in Maida Vale was only 10 minutes from her own home. Carter and Mitford are both alumnae of Francis Holland School.
- How many seasons does Outrageous have?Powered by Alexa
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content