IMDb RATING
4.3/10
1.4K
YOUR RATING
Focus on a series of interviews about people whose actions shape the world.Focus on a series of interviews about people whose actions shape the world.Focus on a series of interviews about people whose actions shape the world.
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
A fantastic documentary series! Each of the 7 people were least expected to get beyond their foundational lives, yet they did. With great passion to help make a better world for everyone, they achieved greatness. Greatness that would have gone under the radar until some future historial wrote about them ~ but for the leadership of the producers. It is a reminder to everyone, to stop focusing on being negative & turn to be more positive despite the obstacles. Starting with our own families, neighbors, co-workers, etc. ~ whoever they may be. Their message was simple: KINDNESS BEGETS KINDNESS & GOODNESS.
Road to hell is paved by good intentions should be a subtitle of this show. These are the people that create a climate of irreversible damage to local and global society. Their talking points are pure demagogy and their actions are against international human rights and anti-science at its core. This is pure demagogy of the ruling elites that governs societal collapse all around the world. The worse aspect of these people is that it is possible they just don't know what they are doing but the narcissism is obvious. The age of extreme religious views cloaked as "science" has started few years ago and things might get much worse before they get better.
It's good to know the Sussexes have found useful work. Being a name, as they certainly are, has value in itself--the series, we're reminded, is "presented by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex"--so it's admirable they've used their fame to serve a noble cause. A documentary series that showcases remarkable individuals who've accomplished something, contributed to the betterment of humanity, and/or made personal sacrifices is a project of merit, without question. Unfortunately, it's also derivative hype in the service of unpleasant self-promotion. The series' featured guests are allotted a cursory 30 minutes to relate their stories (most of them familiar to anyone current with events), underscored with music for the appropriate sentiment: they're mostly talking heads, accompanied by background footage (an off-screen voice, British, poses questions occasionally). Watch each episode (seven in all) and you become aware that they are, more or less, thinly disguised highlight reels. The question remains: who is being highlighted anyway?
The Sussexes ought to have learned by now, at least, a modicum of humility, or the the value of humble service. What makes them obviously compatible is that neither shrinks from the spotlight. Perhaps it's unavoidable for them not to appear sanctimonious on camera--maybe it's her natural gift for pretending, for ingratiating herself effortlessly, or his plummy tones of privilege, but they're both well advised to serve best behind the scenes, like eminences grises, and heed Gloria Steinem's claim for "authenticity." The flaw of this otherwise well intended series is their driven need--unmistakable from the outset--to justify themselves to their critics. They have, after all, acquired a legion of them. They might believe it's through no fault of their own, but that, they should realize, is precisely the problem.
The Sussexes ought to have learned by now, at least, a modicum of humility, or the the value of humble service. What makes them obviously compatible is that neither shrinks from the spotlight. Perhaps it's unavoidable for them not to appear sanctimonious on camera--maybe it's her natural gift for pretending, for ingratiating herself effortlessly, or his plummy tones of privilege, but they're both well advised to serve best behind the scenes, like eminences grises, and heed Gloria Steinem's claim for "authenticity." The flaw of this otherwise well intended series is their driven need--unmistakable from the outset--to justify themselves to their critics. They have, after all, acquired a legion of them. They might believe it's through no fault of their own, but that, they should realize, is precisely the problem.
How does it matter who produced the series or who speaks the introduction? That is less than 2 minutes of each documentary in the series. Take home the message instead and concentrate on what these leaders are really saying. If people do not like the series it is more because they are uncomfortable with the message these leaders want to convey rather than the fact that Harry and Meghan are part of the production team.
I have already seen the first two documentaries and am mid-way through the third one in the series. Once the focus is on the person who is speaking, there is no mention at all of the producers. So, take home the message. That's what will benefit each one of us.
I have already seen the first two documentaries and am mid-way through the third one in the series. Once the focus is on the person who is speaking, there is no mention at all of the producers. So, take home the message. That's what will benefit each one of us.
I was truly disappointed with this series, the people highlighted are extraordinary in their fields; yet, I couldn't help but feel that their stories where butchered. I believe that it was expected to actually know the biography of all those involved, in order to feel connected; their live stories felt incomplete, and in spite of their extraordinay experiences some episodes ended up being boring; which really impacted me, how could someone belittle these people's lives to the point of boredom? When they are everything BUT boring, so disappointed.
Also, don't understand the need to include Meghan Markle and Prince Harry in each episode, in my view, it diminished the quality of the show; and for the first time in my life, the constant mention of Nelson Mandela made me cringe to a point. I would have respected them more, if they would have given the light to their guests, if they would have taken more time to create their stories with the impact that they possess; the constant need to try to remind everyone that they're "trying" to do good, only reinforces their constant need for attention and validation.
If there's going to be a secon season, I truly hope that the respect that their possible guests deserve, comes through... Handing the torch to those who actually have a message to deliver. Even though, I don't think a second season with this same team is needed.
Also, don't understand the need to include Meghan Markle and Prince Harry in each episode, in my view, it diminished the quality of the show; and for the first time in my life, the constant mention of Nelson Mandela made me cringe to a point. I would have respected them more, if they would have given the light to their guests, if they would have taken more time to create their stories with the impact that they possess; the constant need to try to remind everyone that they're "trying" to do good, only reinforces their constant need for attention and validation.
If there's going to be a secon season, I truly hope that the respect that their possible guests deserve, comes through... Handing the torch to those who actually have a message to deliver. Even though, I don't think a second season with this same team is needed.
- How many seasons does Live to Lead have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Справжня ціна лідерства
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 30m
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content