Explores the vanguard career of the woman who, as actor, performer, and advocate, revolutionized the portrayal of women in media, redefined their roles in show business, and inspired generat... Read allExplores the vanguard career of the woman who, as actor, performer, and advocate, revolutionized the portrayal of women in media, redefined their roles in show business, and inspired generations to dream big and make it on their own.Explores the vanguard career of the woman who, as actor, performer, and advocate, revolutionized the portrayal of women in media, redefined their roles in show business, and inspired generations to dream big and make it on their own.
- Nominated for 1 Primetime Emmy
- 1 win & 7 nominations total
- Self
- (archive footage)
- Self
- (voice)
- Self
- (voice)
- Self
- (voice)
- Self
- (voice)
- Self
- (voice)
- Self
- (voice)
- Self
- (voice)
- Self
- (voice)
- Self
- (voice)
- Self
- (voice)
- Self
- (archive footage)
- Self
- (voice)
- Ward Cleaver
- (archive footage)
- Self
- (archive footage)
- June Cleaver
- (archive footage)
- Self
- (archive footage)
- Self
- (voice)
Featured reviews
That same dualism was part of who MTM was as a human being, as the documentary points out, particularly in a condescending Suskind interview that she handles beautifully. But it misses a great deal too. Her shows were not just funny, they were important milestones culturally. They were part of an era; they helped define that era. The 70s show became a huge hit, won tons of Tonys, and spun off so many shows it seemed at the time like MTM Enterprises had replaced MGM - they even spoofed the studio with a tiny cat instead of a Lion. Her impact was huge. But you don't really get a feel for that impact from this doc.
For instance, instead of spending way too much time on her last husband, which gets creepy and weird (like someone is trying really hard to prove something - he's a producer), more important to her legacy would have been more depth about her company, how those shows spun off, and her relationship with husband Grant Tinker, which is glossed over. (Jealousy?) Tinker was a huge TV influence, first through his wife then on his own. He deserved more in the doc.
Oddly enough, so did MTM. We endure overly long clips from the same interviewers, and too many voiceovers from celebrity fans. Better would have been in-depth clips from her career, especially her films, more analysis of her impact on television from the experts (not just friends), more background from Van Dyke, and more context about other iconic shows at that time: All In The Family, Rhoda, Maud, Sanford and Son, and the Jeffersons. And it would have been perfect to end, not with the last husband ad nauseum (2 appearances are sufficient, not dozens), but with that wonderful reunion of MTM, Betty, and Valerie on 'Hot in Cleveland,' her last scripted performance. It was a beautiful TV moment, like all of her work. The doc director treated his subject far too superficially.
This biopic provides insights into MTM's point of view throughout her career. It also tries to define her place in (mostly) TV history, as society was redefining itself in the 1960s. To that end, the documentary includes numerous quotes from notable feminists of that era, primarily to skewer her Laura Petrie role as a bad influence. This raises a couple of questions.
First, was the "Dick Van Dyke Show"---and its characters----a reflection of the changing times or a cause of change? Probably both, but primarily the former.
Secondly, if the Laura Petrie role is iconic, is it due to MTM or the producers, directors and writers of the show who defined the role and gave it life through the scripts? I can admire MTM as a person and actor without trying to make her a social icon. As we learn from the documentary, the public really knew little about MTM, the woman, at the time.
The film does illustrate how dramatically MTM evolved and became more self-actualized as she dealt with career challenges, personal tragedies, and relationship issues. It is easy to feel sympathy for her, because she always maintained a sense of humor and she always tried to improve, professionally and personally.
This might not be a very objective overview of her life, but it is enjoyable.
I only have to say that that the documentary did not get deep enough into Ms Tyler Moore's private life.
I loved everything I saw but I wished there was more. I just didn't learn enough about her that I didn't already know.
I saw that Ms Moore's sister and son died young but I wanted to learn more about Ms Moore's background.
She had a happy marriage. But she was a political conservative.
I just wanted to learn about her last years. She was let go by Neil Simon while preparing for a role on Broadway.it would have been interesting to understand what occurred as she was suffering Ming from diabetes.
Did you know
- TriviaDirector James Adolphus was not familiar with Mary Tyler Moore's work prior to making this movie. The producers saw this as a positive, and it was one of the reasons he was hired to direct the movie.
- Quotes
Mary Tyler Moore: Carl Reiner saw some spark of humor in me and he started writing for me to be funny.
- How long is Being Mary Tyler Moore?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Mary Tyler Moore: la chica de la tele
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro