The friends facing disastrously funny situations together and having each other's backs through the trenches to make it out of a new mess this time.The friends facing disastrously funny situations together and having each other's backs through the trenches to make it out of a new mess this time.The friends facing disastrously funny situations together and having each other's backs through the trenches to make it out of a new mess this time.
- Awards
- 2 wins & 3 nominations total
Richa Amberr
- Reporter
- (as Richa Ambar)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Summary
Reviewers say 'Fukrey 3' garners mixed opinions, with many praising its humor, cast chemistry, and continuation of beloved antics. Fans appreciate the comedic timing and light-hearted nature. However, critics argue the film lacks a coherent plot, with absurd scenarios straining credibility. Complaints about the weak script and diminishing quality compared to earlier installments arise. Some viewers find the humor forced and the movie disappointing, suggesting the franchise should have ended earlier.
Featured reviews
The standard of comic movies is going downwards each day. Non veg jokes without any significance included where it was actually not required. I didn't like most of the scenes in 2nd half although first half atleast some. Choocha as usual tries to entertain using his third grade jokes, Lali with same humourless humour and Hunny as usual like taste of water in any curry. Pankaj Tripathi I can say is an actor whichever film he works gives his best and has a unique aura. Best suited for comic films. Richa was over acting most of the time trying to forcefully act as a punjaban kudi. Overall the film is good to watch when you are tired and need AC room to sleep.
Pankaj tripathy was the only good thing about the movie. The jokes are poorly written and the script is weak which just seems pointless after a while. Its a sheer waste of time and the. Don't think imdb is reliable anymore, with such high ratings for such a film. It's a classic franchise killer. They should've stuck with the original writers from the first two parts which it seems they did not. Feels like I would need to rewatch the first two parts again now, just to protect the memory of the first two parts in my mind. Rest if you have a couple of hundred bucks, or more, to kill and want to increase your appreciation for the classic priyadarshan films, do go and watch it :)
Don't know what director producer are trying to achieving by spoiling the legacy of great 1st instalment of Fukrey. Fukrey returns was bad and here Fukrey 3 is worse. No good punch lines, no laughable jokes. It's a forced movie. Pulkit Samrat looks too tired and disinterested in movie. Pankaj Tripathi and Varun Sharma did their best but the script is so weak that they too can't save the film. It's completely illogical movie.
This is clearly to be avoided as its waste of time. Instead of watching Fukrey3 I recommend watch Fukrey again to make your time worthy and have good laugh again.
And I hope there is no further instalment.
This is clearly to be avoided as its waste of time. Instead of watching Fukrey3 I recommend watch Fukrey again to make your time worthy and have good laugh again.
And I hope there is no further instalment.
Can't make you laugh. You wait till the end of movie and it doesn't come. Conclusion:
"Drenched in Regret" is a perfect example of how not to make a film. Its lackluster storyline, poor acting, and failed attempts at humor leave audiences feeling like they've been caught in a never-ending rainstorm of disappointment. Perhaps it's best to leave this movie shipwrecked and seek out something that won't make you regret spending your time and money on it.am left with no choice but to give it a dismal 1-star rating. The poor story, abysmal acting, and unfunny jokes all contribute to this sinking ship of a movie.
The movie will seem a bit haphazardly compiled from 2nd quarter. Flashback scenes take a lot of screentime. Whereas main story don't get enough time to have a proper buildup.
What seemed to me is, unlike many other poor performing sequel movies, Fukrey 3 did not lack a good story. Instead it lacked dialogue, direction and finally editing.
Actors acted perfectly according to direction. But an opportunity wasted by the director, since it's directors job to make and implement the whole masterpiece plan.
Pros: Funny scenes to make you giggle still exists because of Varun, Pulkit, Manjot and Pankaj ji and they are some genuine fun parts of the movie. So, to me this movie is not a 1 or 2. It gets a solid 3 out of 5.
What seemed to me is, unlike many other poor performing sequel movies, Fukrey 3 did not lack a good story. Instead it lacked dialogue, direction and finally editing.
Actors acted perfectly according to direction. But an opportunity wasted by the director, since it's directors job to make and implement the whole masterpiece plan.
Pros: Funny scenes to make you giggle still exists because of Varun, Pulkit, Manjot and Pankaj ji and they are some genuine fun parts of the movie. So, to me this movie is not a 1 or 2. It gets a solid 3 out of 5.
Did you know
- TriviaRicha Chaddha's character Bholi Punjaban's name is revealed to be Phoolkumari Sehgal.
- SoundtracksVe Fukrey
Shabbir Ahmed
Dev Negi, Romy & Asees Kaur
- How long is Fukrey 3?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- ₹50 (estimated)
- Gross worldwide
- $583,921
- Runtime
- 2h 27m(147 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content