The ultimate and comprehensive documentary film about the exceptional writer George Orwell.The ultimate and comprehensive documentary film about the exceptional writer George Orwell.The ultimate and comprehensive documentary film about the exceptional writer George Orwell.
- Awards
- 4 wins & 11 nominations total
George Orwell
- Self - Novelist
- (archive footage)
U Win Khine
- Self - Lead Immigration Officer, Myanmar
- (archive footage)
Min Aung Hlaing
- Self - Prime Minister of Myanmar
- (archive footage)
- (as General Min Aung Hlaing)
Augusto Pinochet
- Self - Supreme Head of the Nation
- (archive footage)
- (as General Augusto Pinochet)
Ferdinand Marcos
- Self - President of the Philippines
- (archive footage)
Yoweri Museveni
- Self - President of Uganda
- (archive footage)
- (as General Yoweri Museveni)
Vladimir Putin
- Self - President of Russia
- (archive footage)
Viktor Orbán
- Self - Prime Minister of Hungary
- (archive footage)
George W. Bush
- Self - 43rd President of the United States
- (archive footage)
- (as President George W. Bush)
Colin Powell
- Self - Secretary of State
- (archive footage)
Victor Otto
- Self - Father of a Russian Soldier Killed Ukraine
- (archive footage)
Ida Blair
- Self - Orwell's Mother
- (archive footage)
Richard Blair
- Self - Orwell's Father
- (archive footage)
Donald Trump
- Self - 45th President of the United States
- (archive footage)
Sidney Powell
- Self - Attorney and Former Prosecutor
- (archive footage)
Jordan Klepper
- Self - The Daily Show with Trevor Noah Corespondent
- (archive footage)
Lawrence O'Donnell
- Self - Host, The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell
- (archive footage)
Joseph Stalin
- Self - Leader of the Soviet Union
- (archive footage)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
6.6519
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Words versus images
I was ready to give this a chance, after all I turned up to see it at the London Film Festival with the director present. He had clearly done a lot of archival work and the opening sections were fair enough, Orwell's letter and diaries being accompanied by fine shots of Jura and great photos. But after half an hour the director then started to try something more ambitious and the whole thing fell apart as he bombarded us with the newsreel footage and footage from adaptations of 1984 that he thought would enhance the power of Orwell's words. Sadly if anything they diluted them.
Two massive howlers. First, the scenes from 1984 in which Big Brother is adored by a crowd are followed by people at the republican convention cheering Trump. But the latter is really pretty standard practice at party rallies in multi party democracies. That is not what Big Brother is about. Second, the director addresses what he takes to be today's version of newsspeak by taking a series of cliched expressions or euphemisms, but instead of unpacking them, he simply translates them into what he thinks they really mean, which he expressed on screen with a phrase of his own. The effect of all this is that the film is in the end a simplistic mess, like a not very good imitation of Adam Curtis.
Two massive howlers. First, the scenes from 1984 in which Big Brother is adored by a crowd are followed by people at the republican convention cheering Trump. But the latter is really pretty standard practice at party rallies in multi party democracies. That is not what Big Brother is about. Second, the director addresses what he takes to be today's version of newsspeak by taking a series of cliched expressions or euphemisms, but instead of unpacking them, he simply translates them into what he thinks they really mean, which he expressed on screen with a phrase of his own. The effect of all this is that the film is in the end a simplistic mess, like a not very good imitation of Adam Curtis.
Hard to Watch
Watched it recently at a film festival. Go see it if you don't mind a tedious preachy clip show of historical footage with frequent bland voiceovers narrating Orwell's words, often with the background of a slow-moving vista of dull dreary Scotland. This sort of work comes off as a naive high school politics student trying to be original and edgy, since the film goes down the same predictable politically one-sided narratives (complete with sentimental instrumental soundtrack). Essentially a sophomoric propaganda piece with stale observations about government power that are already known by anyone familiar with Orwell's main works. Couldn't take it anymore, and we walked out near the end.
Edit: on second thought, I give it 2 stars instead of 1. The part about Orwell's time in Burma was mildly interesting.
Edit: on second thought, I give it 2 stars instead of 1. The part about Orwell's time in Burma was mildly interesting.
A Comprehensive, Relevant Profile
George Orwell (born Eric Arthur Blair, 1903-1050), author of such legendary novels as the allegorical Animal Farm and dystopian 1984, has been called one of the greatest and most insightful writers of the 20th Century. And, in light of recent history, he's also been widely regarded as one of the most prescient, a plainspoken scribe who clearly saw the future long before it happened and wasn't afraid to straightforwardly call it for what it would become. In recognition of that legacy, Orwell's life, work and outlooks are now the subject of this latest production from prolific activist documentarian Raoul Peck. The film weaves together a biography of the author, the central themes of his journalistic and literary works, and illustrations of how those notions have materialized in the "management" (or, one might more accurately say, manipulation) of social, political and world affairs over the years, with an especially heavy emphasis on the present day. The filmmaker cites myriad examples of these manifestations to show just how on target Orwell was in predicting what would lie ahead, both in the places where he lived (England, Spain and Burma (now Myanmar)), as well as other locales around the globe, including Russia, Ukraine, Haiti, France, Latin America, Asia, and, most importantly, the US. And, while Peck largely targets the policies and practices of the right, he's not afraid to take on anyone whose dogma is so rigid that it throws circumstances off balance for everyone. Most notably, though, the picture details just how insidious these initiatives can be, agendas accomplished through the skillful "handling" of language, media, beliefs and actions that lead to intentional, calculated and shameful obfuscation, creating purposely misleading impressions in the minds of an unwittingly susceptible public. The narrative places much emphasis on the signature double-talk expressions Orwell features in his narratives (especially 1984), including such meaningless phrases as "War is peace," "Freedom is slavery" and "Ignorance is strength," slogans that say nothing but become widely embraced with relentless and intimidating repetition. The director's inclusion of these references thus depicts the deliberate war on truth being waged by those in power who will do anything to maintain their control over it, particularly when dealing with a compliant, quiescent population. These themes are further supported by an array of clips from other fictional and documentary works, such as the 1954, 1956 and 1984 versions of "1984," "I, Daniel Blake" (2016), "Land and Freedom" (1995), "Minority Report" (2002), and "Orwell Rolls in His Grave" (2003), to name a few. And further enhancement is provided in numerous voiceover sequences from Orwell's own writings, deftly narrated by Damian Lewis. All told, these elements provide a comprehensive look at the author and his work, as well as its relevance in today's world. With that said, however, some aspects of this offering could use some work, most notably in the organization of its content, its overreliance at times on material that needs to be read (and that often flies by too quickly) and an occasional tendency toward redundancy, elements that have been known to intrude upon other films by this director. In addition, "Orwell: 2+ 2 = 5" has frequently been termed (and quite accurately at that) as the scariest picture of 2025, primarily due to its inclusion of some troubling graphic imagery (sensitive viewers take note). Nevertheless, this is an important film for our times, one that viewers should not be afraid to watch considering the stakes involved. Indeed, turning a blind eye might be easier to do in the moment - but probably not in the long run.
10nestici
Defend the Truth
Saw this at the Toronto international film festival. This is an excellent documentary that explains Orwell's life and thoughts using his own words. Contemporary news footage bring his work to life as the #1 predictor of the messes we are in now.
As Orwell thought: it's not left or right, it's defend the truth!
As Orwell thought: it's not left or right, it's defend the truth!
Misses the point in 2025
Saw this at a film festival. This is some sort of a biography of Eric Arthur Blair (AKA George Orwell) through some of his letters. That part is quite interesting, I learned a few things but basically it's data you can find on wikipedia.
The movie tries to draw a relation between his life and the writing of his major and last book: 1984. It rely heavily on previous adaptations which is quite annoying (make new with old). But IMO the real weak point of the movie is its failure to implement Orwell's ideas into our contemporary world.
The movie takes a strong partisanship side and doesn't question itself about it (basically: billionaires are too rich, chinese military parade are scary, we live in a democracy that needs to be saved from tyranny). It somehow felt like propaganda: we've been at war with Oceania the whole time, and you shouldn't question about it.
I was quite surprised of the absence of certain events that were a very good exemple of Orwellian dystopia in the last few years: how can you make a movie about Orwell in 2025 and not a single word about covid? It was a period of heavily censored information, where anything out of the unique doctrine was considered heresy, tens of newspeak words, constant rewriting of history, with the ultimate goal being to comply with restrictions rules. Covid is literally the elephant in the room.
Add a few shots of poor people in their environment facing the camera with great lighting for emotional value, and more than 10 years old interview of Edward Snowden, you end up with old footage sold as new with missed analysis.
I guess the upside would be to draw curiosity for the book for the viewers who haven't read it yet.
The movie tries to draw a relation between his life and the writing of his major and last book: 1984. It rely heavily on previous adaptations which is quite annoying (make new with old). But IMO the real weak point of the movie is its failure to implement Orwell's ideas into our contemporary world.
The movie takes a strong partisanship side and doesn't question itself about it (basically: billionaires are too rich, chinese military parade are scary, we live in a democracy that needs to be saved from tyranny). It somehow felt like propaganda: we've been at war with Oceania the whole time, and you shouldn't question about it.
I was quite surprised of the absence of certain events that were a very good exemple of Orwellian dystopia in the last few years: how can you make a movie about Orwell in 2025 and not a single word about covid? It was a period of heavily censored information, where anything out of the unique doctrine was considered heresy, tens of newspeak words, constant rewriting of history, with the ultimate goal being to comply with restrictions rules. Covid is literally the elephant in the room.
Add a few shots of poor people in their environment facing the camera with great lighting for emotional value, and more than 10 years old interview of Edward Snowden, you end up with old footage sold as new with missed analysis.
I guess the upside would be to draw curiosity for the book for the viewers who haven't read it yet.
Did you know
- ConnectionsEdited from Oliver Twist (1948)
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Languages
- Filming locations
- Jura, Inner Hebrides, Scotland, UK(many locations)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $355,288
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $25,887
- Oct 5, 2025
- Gross worldwide
- $355,288
- Runtime
- 1h 59m(119 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content

