Two friends, aspiring YouTubers, trespass where they shouldn't. Their adventure takes a terrifying turn as they confront an unimaginable horrorTwo friends, aspiring YouTubers, trespass where they shouldn't. Their adventure takes a terrifying turn as they confront an unimaginable horrorTwo friends, aspiring YouTubers, trespass where they shouldn't. Their adventure takes a terrifying turn as they confront an unimaginable horror
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaAll entries contain spoilers
Featured review
"Do Not Enter" attempts to breathe new life into the genre with its unique setting and chilling atmosphere. However, it falls short in several areas.
The film follows the story of two YouTubers who decide to spend a night in a haunted house. The house, with its dark history and eerie ambiance, is a character in itself, adding to the overall sense of dread and unease.
One of the film's strengths lies in its jump scares. Cardozo masterfully crafts moments of genuine terror that will make even the most seasoned horror fans jump out of their seats. The use of sound and lighting to create tension is commendable, and the scares are well-timed and effective. These moments are the highlights of the film and showcase Cardozo's potential as a horror director.
However, the film's characters are a major letdown. The two protagonists are unlikeable and make it difficult for the audience to root for them. Their actions and decisions often come across as irrational and frustrating, which detracts from the overall experience. In a genre where character empathy is crucial, "Do Not Enter" fails to deliver.
Another significant issue with the film is its opening scene, which features verbal homophobic comments. This choice is not only in poor taste but also sets a negative tone for the rest of the movie. It feels unnecessary and out of place, alienating a portion of the audience right from the start. In an era where inclusivity and sensitivity are paramount, this misstep is glaring and detracts from the film's overall impact.
The film's pacing is another area where it falters. While the jump scares are effective, the moments in between often drag, making the film feel longer than its runtime. The build-up to the scares is sometimes too slow, and the lack of character development makes these lulls even more noticeable. A tighter script and better pacing could have significantly improved the overall experience.
Despite its flaws, "Do Not Enter" does have some redeeming qualities. The cinematography is impressive, especially considering the found footage format. The handheld camera work adds to the sense of realism and immersion, making the audience feel like they are part of the experience. The film's setting and atmosphere are also well-executed, creating a sense of claustrophobia and dread that lingers throughout.
The film follows the story of two YouTubers who decide to spend a night in a haunted house. The house, with its dark history and eerie ambiance, is a character in itself, adding to the overall sense of dread and unease.
One of the film's strengths lies in its jump scares. Cardozo masterfully crafts moments of genuine terror that will make even the most seasoned horror fans jump out of their seats. The use of sound and lighting to create tension is commendable, and the scares are well-timed and effective. These moments are the highlights of the film and showcase Cardozo's potential as a horror director.
However, the film's characters are a major letdown. The two protagonists are unlikeable and make it difficult for the audience to root for them. Their actions and decisions often come across as irrational and frustrating, which detracts from the overall experience. In a genre where character empathy is crucial, "Do Not Enter" fails to deliver.
Another significant issue with the film is its opening scene, which features verbal homophobic comments. This choice is not only in poor taste but also sets a negative tone for the rest of the movie. It feels unnecessary and out of place, alienating a portion of the audience right from the start. In an era where inclusivity and sensitivity are paramount, this misstep is glaring and detracts from the film's overall impact.
The film's pacing is another area where it falters. While the jump scares are effective, the moments in between often drag, making the film feel longer than its runtime. The build-up to the scares is sometimes too slow, and the lack of character development makes these lulls even more noticeable. A tighter script and better pacing could have significantly improved the overall experience.
Despite its flaws, "Do Not Enter" does have some redeeming qualities. The cinematography is impressive, especially considering the found footage format. The handheld camera work adds to the sense of realism and immersion, making the audience feel like they are part of the experience. The film's setting and atmosphere are also well-executed, creating a sense of claustrophobia and dread that lingers throughout.
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $550,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 25 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content