What Is Starfleet?
- Episode aired Aug 21, 2025
- TV-PG
- 41m
IMDb RATING
6.3/10
1.9K
YOUR RATING
While aiding a war-torn planet, Pike and crew face scrutiny from a probing journalist.While aiding a war-torn planet, Pike and crew face scrutiny from a probing journalist.While aiding a war-torn planet, Pike and crew face scrutiny from a probing journalist.
Featured reviews
OMG, what kind of maudlin horse manure are they peddling? For goodness sake, can we get some actual science fiction instead of these low-rent psychological explorations? Yeah, there are moral and ethical implications to what the Federation does, but anytime your takeaway involves saving misunderstood sea creatures, or whatever the hell that thing was, you're pandering to the most simple-minded sentiments of overly sensitive middle-schoolers. How about hiring some actual writers instead of these clueless hacks?
Leave it to the writers of Strange New Worlds to come up with a pretty decent premise for an episode but then proceed to screw it all up. The episode has an Encounter At Farpoint feel to it, but unfortunately the story kept getting interrupted with this documentary style episode. Ortega's brother is such a pointless character, which made the episode kind of pointless. You never really feel for the creature as the story is constantly interrupted. Just 3 episodes left in season 3. What else can the writers screw up?
I'm not sure why there is often a compulsion to create documentary-style episodes on fiction shows, but they always fall flat. This is no different. The questions asked by the interviewer are so juvenile and offensive that it's hard to tell if it's a consequence of bad writing, or intentional to display his ignorance. The questions the crew put up with wouldn't have been tolerated in any reality. The amount of stuff that was "declassified" that would not have been was silly. I would've rated it higher if the premise had been a documentary that Starfleet refused to release.
The moral ambiguity that was the main theme with the episode was this episode's redeeming quality.
The moral ambiguity that was the main theme with the episode was this episode's redeeming quality.
TV shows need to stop doing this. It's the lowest rated episode every season when The Rookie does it. It's gonna be the lowest rated episode for this season. Stop doing documentaries of your characters in TV shows. It's really stupid. Such a waste of an episode. The only thing you can say that's good about this episode is that it's visually stunning, looks great.
I'll say this about this episode: it's clever and unusual to do a faux-documentary about Starfleet (can't recall that this has ever been done before) and critiquing the militaristic aspect of Starfleet does address a longstanding controversy: are Starfleet officers explorers or warriors?
Trouble is, there isn't much to this critique. If you want to explore, you will run into surly aliens who will shoot at you. Case closed.
The ending of this episode slammed right into a different and more interesting critique, right under the writers' nose: Starfleet is a bunch of moralizing prigs who get themselves into trouble by steamrolling over alien cultures who don't live up to their lofty standards.
The original series wasn't guilty of this too much but it's been in evidence from TNG onwards. Remember all the obviously-wrong aliens that Picard lectured and then flew away? Remember how the Federation used the Bajoran wormhole to colonize what turned out to be Dominion space and then rather than just sensibly retreat, decided to fight about it?
No wonder Starfleet officers have to be warriors with that kind of high-handed attitude. They can get away with it because they have a big alliance and a lot of firepower. That doesn't make them right or smart.
What's going to happen the next time the Federation want something from the Lutani? They're going to get a cold shoulder, that's for sure. Maybe they'll become allies with the Klingons.
I was waiting for some kind of rationale why Starfleet was even getting involved in somebody else's war. I figured they didn't want the combatants to ally with the Klingons or they had a moon made of dilithium or something.
A little more detail about the warring sides, and how desperate each might be, would be warranted. If the Lutani were battling for survival, that puts a different spin on their moral ambiguity and makes Starfleet look like a bunch of jerks.
Someday maybe Star Trek writers will develop more self-awareness in their writing. It's pretty unsophisticated and surface-level right now.
Trouble is, there isn't much to this critique. If you want to explore, you will run into surly aliens who will shoot at you. Case closed.
The ending of this episode slammed right into a different and more interesting critique, right under the writers' nose: Starfleet is a bunch of moralizing prigs who get themselves into trouble by steamrolling over alien cultures who don't live up to their lofty standards.
The original series wasn't guilty of this too much but it's been in evidence from TNG onwards. Remember all the obviously-wrong aliens that Picard lectured and then flew away? Remember how the Federation used the Bajoran wormhole to colonize what turned out to be Dominion space and then rather than just sensibly retreat, decided to fight about it?
No wonder Starfleet officers have to be warriors with that kind of high-handed attitude. They can get away with it because they have a big alliance and a lot of firepower. That doesn't make them right or smart.
What's going to happen the next time the Federation want something from the Lutani? They're going to get a cold shoulder, that's for sure. Maybe they'll become allies with the Klingons.
I was waiting for some kind of rationale why Starfleet was even getting involved in somebody else's war. I figured they didn't want the combatants to ally with the Klingons or they had a moon made of dilithium or something.
A little more detail about the warring sides, and how desperate each might be, would be warranted. If the Lutani were battling for survival, that puts a different spin on their moral ambiguity and makes Starfleet look like a bunch of jerks.
Someday maybe Star Trek writers will develop more self-awareness in their writing. It's pretty unsophisticated and surface-level right now.
Did you know
- TriviaIn most episodes the USS Enterprise is normally referred to as a starship. This episode mentions it to be a Constitution-class heavy cruiser, the Constitution-class was first referred to as a heavy cruiser in Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (1984), as seen on Chekov's tactical console. Star Trek III also revealed that the Klingons referred to the Constitution-class as a "Federation battle cruiser". The TNG episode Conspiracy (1988) revealed that Ambassador-class starships like the USS Excalibur (NCC-26517), USS Horatio (NCC-10532), USS Zhukov (NCC-62136), and USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-C) are also classified as heavy cruisers.
- GoofsAt around 30 minutes Pike says, "set a course for the system's sun.". The correct term should be 'star', as the word Sun is the name for the star that Earth orbits around in the Solar System.
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 41m
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content