Sean Hall speaks with CNN on how decades of cultural appropriation have shaped the music industry and gives insight on the case against Taylor Swift.Sean Hall speaks with CNN on how decades of cultural appropriation have shaped the music industry and gives insight on the case against Taylor Swift.Sean Hall speaks with CNN on how decades of cultural appropriation have shaped the music industry and gives insight on the case against Taylor Swift.
Featured reviews
The documentary explores the copyright lawsuit surrounding the song Shake it Off, the highly popular and successful, Diamond certified single by Taylor Swift. The "writers" Hall and Butler claimed that Swift stole their lyrics and progression. This documentary fails to dive deep into the actual legality of the lawsuit or with actual court documentation, or legal filings.
The problem is that the writers Hall and Butler sold their rights years ago, and thus did not hold legal claim to the song any longer and failed to inform the courts. The owners who purchased the song from Hall and Butler sided with Swift. Once it was revealed to the courts that Hall and Butler had sold their rights, the lawsuit dissolved rapidly. Even another artist used the exact phrase and progression and performed their top 10 hit at an awards show prior to Shake it Off even being written and they did not sue that artist.
The lesson here that should have been discussed is the importance of maintaining your publishing rights. In this case, Hall and Butler sold their rights but still wanted to get paid for something they no longer owned. It would have made a more interesting documentary had they actually dealt with the importance of copyright and publishing rights, instead they failed to explain this critical hole in their case. Failure to explore the lack of publishing rights, the foundation of copyright lawsuits, seemed to reveal a potential biased narrative being pushed by the production company. Its unclear why they failed to include this detail of critical importance not only to this case, but to all cases. You must actually own the rights.
The problem is that the writers Hall and Butler sold their rights years ago, and thus did not hold legal claim to the song any longer and failed to inform the courts. The owners who purchased the song from Hall and Butler sided with Swift. Once it was revealed to the courts that Hall and Butler had sold their rights, the lawsuit dissolved rapidly. Even another artist used the exact phrase and progression and performed their top 10 hit at an awards show prior to Shake it Off even being written and they did not sue that artist.
The lesson here that should have been discussed is the importance of maintaining your publishing rights. In this case, Hall and Butler sold their rights but still wanted to get paid for something they no longer owned. It would have made a more interesting documentary had they actually dealt with the importance of copyright and publishing rights, instead they failed to explain this critical hole in their case. Failure to explore the lack of publishing rights, the foundation of copyright lawsuits, seemed to reveal a potential biased narrative being pushed by the production company. Its unclear why they failed to include this detail of critical importance not only to this case, but to all cases. You must actually own the rights.
This was a complete joke. I was baffled at these dudes thinking that they have any writing credits to this song. Just trying to ride off of Taylor's fame, and make money off of someone else's hard work. If this song wasn't poplar they wouldn't even care, but because it's Taylor Swift.... Taylor doesn't need to steal song lyrics, she's one of the best lyricist out there. The lyrics they are accusing her of stealing are common phrases. Just 2 guys trying to ride off of Taylor's success, and trying to get media coverage, that I hope backfired on them. Very disappointed in HBO for even airing this garbage. Please don't waste any time watching this joke of a documentary.
More CNN trash. Leave it up to CNN to give this guy so much time and effort to create this documentary. The guy had no legal right to a song after he sold his rights away. Once that was discovered, the whole thing collapsed anyway. Leave it up to CNN to try to trash someone who is at the top of her game. I guess being a rich white girls enough for them to attack her on. No mention of how immensely and incredibly talented. She is along with being extremely intelligent in her field.... And I'm not really a fan. Simply because of the genre she's in. But I do acknowledge her story 1000%. I'm seeing a pattern in the CNN documentaries where they are very slanted. I was hoping for better. As well all things CNN they have failed again. Bring back the 1990 version of CNN and we will all be much happier.
This documentary takes a look at Sean Hall and Nathan Butler's ridiculous claim that Swift plagiarized their song, simply by her use of two extremely commonly used phrases in a similar manner to a song they wrote....using the idiotic (non)concept of "cultural appropriation" as a big basis for their claim.
*I* used those phrases before Swift released her hit....and I was an almost-40 white at the time.
Yep, this just helped make their claim even more imbecilic. This documentary trying to give their claim even an ounce of weight was truly just....hilarious.
This was a 100% cash grab by Hall and Butler with absolutely zero legal, or logical, basis. Even suggesting it is anything but is completely idiotic.
*I* used those phrases before Swift released her hit....and I was an almost-40 white at the time.
Yep, this just helped make their claim even more imbecilic. This documentary trying to give their claim even an ounce of weight was truly just....hilarious.
This was a 100% cash grab by Hall and Butler with absolutely zero legal, or logical, basis. Even suggesting it is anything but is completely idiotic.
Definitely don't recommend this documentary. Basically a bunch of clout chasers claiming this was "cultural appropriation". Claiming that the sayings came from the hood. Not sure how this has anything to do with copyright. These are common phrases all around. The fact they didn't even own the rights anymore just adds to the stupidity. People just trying to get unwarranted payouts based on someone else's talent. This documentary in its self is solely trying to use taylor swifts name to gain traction. Especially with the massive traction Taylor Swift has right now.
If I could rate lower I would!
If I could rate lower I would!
Did you know
- TriviaDocumentary states that Taylor Swift's album with song "Shake it off" was released in 1989. Taylor Swift was born in 1989.
Details
- Runtime40 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was Taking on Taylor Swift (2023) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer